Skip to main content

Mass Media and Imperialism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism

Description

From World War II to the present day, the USA has been the world’s dominant media and cultural superpower. The study of US Empire, cultural and media imperialism, and the cultural industries is important to critical political economists of communication, media studies scholars, and US foreign policy researchers. This entry is a holistic conceptualization of the US Empire and the cultural industries. The first section conceptualizes the “media” dimension of US Empire and cultural imperialism. The second section highlights the global economic dominance of the US cultural industries and the role played by the US State in supporting this dominance. The third section focuses on the global geopolitics of the US cultural industries and their support for US “soft power” or public diplomacy campaigns that attempt to build transnational consent to dominant ideas about America and US foreign policy. The fourth section conceptualizes “the media products” of US Empire. The concluding...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexa. (2018). The top 500 sites on the web. Alexa. https://www.alexa.com/topsites

  • Bah, U. (2008). Daniel Lerner, cold war propaganda and U.S. development communication research: An historical critique. Journal of Third World Studies, 25(1), 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, E. (2018). Google, Tesla, Apple, Facebook rake in massive subsidies. The Mercury News. Retrieved from: https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/03/google-tesla-apple-facebook-rake-in-massive-subsidies-report/

  • Beltrán, L. R. (1979). Latin America mass communication: An unfair system for an unfair society. Hans Bredow Institute. Rudfunk and Fersehen Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinbine, B., Gomez, R., & Wasko, J. (Eds.). (2016). Global media giants. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box Office Mojo. (2018). 2018 worldwide grosses. Box Office Mojo. Retrieved from: https://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?view2=worldwide&yr=2018&sort=wwgross&order=DESC&p=.htm

  • Boyd-Barret, O., & Mirrlees, T. (2019). Media imperialism: Continuity and change. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (1977). Media imperialism: Towards an international framework for the analysis of media systems. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 116–135). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (1998). Media imperialism reformulated. In D. Thussu (Ed.), Electronic empires: Global media and local resistance (pp. 157–156). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (2015). Media imperialism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comor, E. (1994). The global political economy of communication. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comor, E. (1997). The re-tooling of American hegemony: U.S. foreign communication policy from free flow to free trade. In A. Sreberny-Mohammadi, D. Winseck, J. McKenna, & O. Boyd-Barret (Eds.), Media in a global context: A reader (pp. 194–206). New York: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N. J. (2008). The cold war and the United States information agency: American propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945–1989. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Defleur, M. L., & Defleur, M. H. (2003). Learning to hate Americans: How U.S. Media shape negative attitudes among teenagers in twelve countries. Spokane: Marquette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, A., & Mattelart, A. (1971). How to read Donald duck: Imperialist ideology in the disney comic. New York: International General Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2010). New imperialism. Information and media imperialism? Global Media and Communication, 6(1), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoshen. (2018). World’s 15 largest video game publishers by revenue (2017). Retrieved from: https://geoshen.com/posts/15-largest-video-game-publishers-by-revenue

  • Golding, P., & Harris, P. (Eds.). (1997). Beyond cultural imperialism: Globalization, communication and the new international order. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & McChesney, R. (1997). The global media: The new missionaries of global capitalism. London/Washington: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2002). The struggle for control of global communication: The formative century. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2007). Tele-communications and empire. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. (1950). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. A. (2007). Empire and communications. Toronto: Dundurn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2005). The telecom crisis and beyond: Restructuring of the global telecommunications system. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 67(4), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2007). Reinterpretation of cultural imperialism: Emerging domestic market vs. continuing U.S. dominance. Media, Culture & Society, 29(5), 753–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2008). Neoliberal restructuring of the global communication system: Mergers and acquisitions. Media, Culture & Society, 30(3), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2011). A critical analysis of U.S. cultural policy in the global film market: Nation- states and FTAs. The International Communication Gazette, 73(8), 651–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, D. Y. (2015). Digital platforms, imperialism and political culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, H. R. (1941). The American century. Life. Retrieved from: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6139.htm

  • Mattelart, A. (1976). Cultural imperialism in the multinationals’ age. Instant Research on Peace and Violence, 6(4), 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (1979). Multinational corporations and the control of culture: The ideological apparatuses of imperialism. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. R. (2011). Open networks and open door: American foreign policy and the narration of the internet. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (2006). The problem of the media: U.S. communication policies in the 21st century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. W. (2008). The political economy of media: Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. (2014). Blowing the roof off the twenty-first century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2005). Anti-Americanism and popular culture. Budapest: Center for policy studies working papers. Retrieved from: http://cps.ceu.hu/publications/working-papers/antiamericanism-and-popular-culture

  • Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2006). Soft Power, or, American Cultural Imperialism? In The New Imperialists: Ideologists of Empire, edited by Colin Mooers, 199–228. Oxford: One World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, Tanner. (2009). Digital Militainment by Design: Playing SOCOM: U.S. Navy Seals. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 5(3), 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2013). Global entertainment media: Between cultural globalization and cultural imperialism. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2014). xXx: Global Imperial Pop. American Communication Journal 16(2), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2016a). Hearts and mines: The US Empire’s cultural industry. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2016b). U.S. empire and communications today: Revisiting Herbert I. Schiller. The Political Economy of Communication, 3(2), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, T. (2018). Global Hollywood: An entertainment imperium, by integration. Cineaction, 99(1): http://cineaction.ca/current/global-hollywood-anentertainment-imperium-by-integration/.

  • Mosco, V. (1996). The political economy of communication: Rethinking and renewal. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. (2006). Notes from the number one country. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, K. (2013). How the new world order and imperialism challenge media studies. TripleC., 11(2), 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, K., & Thussu, D. K. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping BRICS media. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, K., & Varis, T. (1974). Television traffic – A one way street? A survey and analysis of the international flow of television programme material. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Toronto: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2009). The U.S. can reclaim ‘Smart Power.’ Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-nye21-2009jan21,0,3381521.story

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2011). Anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Retrieved from: http://www.ustr.gov/acta/.

  • Open Secrets. (2014). Revolving door. Retrieved from: https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/

  • Peterson, P. G. (2002). Public diplomacy and the war on terrorism. The Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from: http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/public-diplomacy-war-terrorism/p4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, D. (2018). U.S. film industry topped $43 billion in revenue last year, study finds, but it’s not all good news. Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved from: https://deadline.com/2018/07/film-industry-revenue-2017-ibisworld-report-gloomy-box-office-1202425692/

  • Rothkop, D. (1997). In praise of cultural imperialism? Foreign Policy. Retrieved from: https://www1.udel.edu/globalagenda/2004/student/readings/rothkopfimperialism.html

  • Schiller, H. I. (1969). Mass communication and American empire. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (1984). Information and the crisis economy. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (1991). Not yet the post-imperialist era. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3(8), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (2000). Living in the number one country: Reflections of a critic of American empire. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C. (1994). Science of coercion: Communication research and psychological warfare, 1945–1960. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N. (2003). Propaganda Inc.: Selling America’s culture to the world. New York: Seven Stories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, C. (2007). Globalization, development and the mass media. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, C. (2012). Media and cultural imperialism reconsidered. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural Imperialism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touryalai, H., Stoller, K., & Murphy, A. (2018). Global 2000: The world’s largest public companies. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/global2000/#3dd7daa5335d

  • Tunstall, J. (1977). The media are american. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State. (2018). Under secretary for public diplomacy and public affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.state.gov/r/

  • USTR (United States Trade Representative). (2015). 2015 Special 301 Report. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2015-Special-301-Report-FINAL.pdf

  • Wagenleitner, R. (1994). Coca-colonization and the cold war. Chapel Hill/London: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellemeyer, J. (2006). Hollywood and the spread of anti-Americanism. NPR. Retrieved from: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6625002

  • Wike, R., Stokes, B., Poushter, J., & Fetterolf, J. (2017). U.S. image suffers as publics around world question trump’s leadership. Pew Research Center Global Attitudes & Trends. Retrieved from: http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/06/26/tarnished-american-brand/

  • Winseck, D., & Pike, R. M. (2007). Communication and Empire: Media, Markets and Globalization, 1860–1930. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanner Mirrlees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mirrlees, T. (2019). Mass Media and Imperialism. In: Ness, I., Cope, Z. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_122-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_122-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91206-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91206-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics