Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Steve Lerman

Complexity in Mathematics Education

  • Brent DavisEmail author
  • Pratim Sengupta
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_28-3

Definition/Introduction

Over the past half-century, “complex systems” perspectives have risen to prominence across many academic domains in the sciences, engineering, and the humanities. Mathematics was among the originating domains of complexity research. Education has been a relative latecomer, and so perhaps not surprisingly, mathematics education researchers have been leading the way in the field.

There is no unified definition of complexity, principally because formulations emerge from the study of specific phenomena. One thus finds quite focused definitions in such fields as mathematics and software engineering, more indistinct meanings in chemistry and biology, and quite flexible interpretations in the social sciences (cf. Mitchell 2009). Because mathematics education reaches across several domains, conceptions of complexity within the field vary from the precise to the vague, depending on how and where the notion is taken up. Diverse interpretations do collect around a few key...

Keywords

Complexity theory Complexity modeling Design-based research Mathematical modelling Systems thinking 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bell ET (1937) Men of mathematics: the lives and achievements of the great mathematicians from Zeno to Poincaré. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Colella V (2000) Participatory simulations: building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. J Learn Sci 9(4):471–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis B, Renert M (2013) The math teachers know: profound understanding of emergent mathematics. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis B, Simmt E (2006) Mathematics-for-teaching: an ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educ Stud Math 61(3):293–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickes AC, Sengupta P, Farris AV, Basu S (2016) Development of mechanistic reasoning and multilevel explanations of ecology in third grade using agent-based models. Sci Educ 100(4):734–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. English L (2006) Mathematical modeling in the primary school: children’s construction of a consumer guide. Educ Stud Math 62(3):303–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert N, Troitzsch K (2005) Simulation for the social scientist. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Lesh R, Doerr H (eds) (2003) Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving learning and teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  9. Leyva LA (2017) Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: a review of research on gender in mathematics education. J Res Math Educ 48(4):397–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacLeod M, Nersessian NJ (2016) Interdisciplinary problem-solving: emerging modes in integrative systems biology. Eur J Philos Sci 6(3):401–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell M (2009) Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Mowat E, Davis B (2010) Interpreting embodied mathematics using network theory: implications for mathematics education. Complicity 7(1):1–31Google Scholar
  13. Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Sengupta P, Kinnebrew JS, Basu S, Biswas G, Clark D (2013) Integrating computational thinking with K–12 science education using agent-based computation: a theoretical framework. Educ Inf Technol 18(2):351–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sengupta P, Dickes A, Farris AV, Karan A, Martin D, Wright M (2015) Programming in K–12 science classrooms. Commun ACM 58(11):33–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilkerson-Jerde MH, Wilensky UJ (2015) Patterns, probabilities, and people: making sense of quantitative change in complex systems. J Learn Sci 24(2):204–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Werklund School of EducationUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bharath Sriraman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA