Abstract
Deception is a controversial and emotive area, which is strongly associated with the transgression, violation, and breaching of research integrity. Deception has been object of both fear and fascination for many researchers and practitioners for a lengthy period of time. For some, deception runs counter to the established principle of informed consent and hence has no place in ethical decision-making. However, for others, deception does have a rich role to play, albeit submerged, in the critical imagination and toolkit of the researcher. Deception occupies a classic love or loathe position in social research, which often results in extreme and hyper responses from its audiences on both sides. For me, deception can be justified and has been successfully used in various research settings across the social sciences to gain rich insider knowledge and creatively manage the problem of artificiality. It has been long demonized, maligned, and stigmatized in various research communities and is under used. This chapter shall frame the usage of deception in different contexts-popular culture, occupational and social scientific. The author shall explore the diaspora of classical and contemporary exemplars of deception followed by some reflections on the longitudinal use of deception in his covert sociological study of bouncers in the night-time economy of Manchester. The chapter shall also examine the increasing ethical regulation of deception as well as investigate the future landscape for its use and abuse.
Keywords
References
Adler JE (1997) Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating. The Journal of Philosophy 94(9):435–452
Barnes JA (1983) Lying: a sociological view. Aust J Forensic Sci 15(4):152–158
Barnes JA (1994) A pack of lies: towards a sociology of lying. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barrera D, Simpson B (2012) Much ado about deception: consequences of deceiving research participants in the social sciences. Sociol Methods Res 41(3):383–413
Baumrind D (1964) Some thoughts on ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s ‘behavioral study of obedience’. Am Psychol 19:421–423
Baumrind D (2013) Is Milgram’s deceptive research ethically acceptable? Theor Appl Ethics 2(2):1–18
Baumrind D (2015) When subjects become objects: the lies behind the Milgram legend. Theory Psychol 25:690–696
Beecher HK (1955) The powerful placebo. J Am Med Assoc 159(17):1602–1606
Blass T (2004) The man who shocked the world: the life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. Basic Books, London
Bly N (1887) Ten days in a mad-house and miscellaneous sketches: ‘trying to be as servant’ and ‘Nellie Bly as a white slave’. Ian L. Munro Publishers, New York
Bok S (1978) Lying: moral choice in public and private life. Pantheon Books, New York
Bok S (1982) Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation. Pantheon Books, New York
Brandt AM (1978) Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hast Cent Rep 8(6):21–29
Brannan MJ (2017) Power, corruption and lies: mis-selling and the production of culture in financial services. Hum Relat 70(6):641–647
Brannigan A (2004) The rise and fall of social psychology: the use and abuse of the experimental method. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
Brannigan A, Nicholson I, Cherry F (2015) Introduction to the special issue: unplugging the Milgram machine. Theory Psychol 25(5):551–563
Buchanan EA (ed) (2004) Readings in virtual research ethics. Information Science Publishing, Hershey
Buckingham RW, Lack SA, Mount BM, MacLean LD (1976) Living with the dying: use of the technique of participant observation. Can Med Assoc J 115:1211–1215
Bulmer M (1982) When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participation observation. Qual Sociol 5(4):251–264
Calvert C (2000) Voyeur nation: media, privacy, and peering in modern culture. Westview Press, Boulder
Calvey D (2000) Getting on the door and staying there: a covert participant observational study of bouncers. In: Lee-Treweek G, Linkogle S (eds) Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research. Routledge, London, pp 43–60
Calvey D (2008) The art and politics of covert research: doing ‘situated ethics’ in the field. Sociology 42(5):905–918
Calvey D (2013) Covert ethnography in criminology: a submerged yet creative tradition in criminology. Curr Issues Crim Just 25(1):541–550
Calvey D (2017) The art, politics and ethics of undercover fieldwork. Sage, London
Calvey D (2018) Covert: the fear and fascination of a methodological Pariah. In: Iphofen R, Tolich M (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage, London, pp 470–485
Calvey D (2019) The everyday world of bouncing: a rehabilitated role for covert ethnography. Qual Res 19(3):247–262
Carusi A, Jirotka M (2009) From data archive to ethical labyrinth. Qual Res 9(3):285–298
Colosi R (2010) Dirty dancing? An ethnography of lap-dancing. Willan Publishing, Abingdon
Cressey PG (1932) The taxi-dance hall; a sociological study in commercialized recreation and city life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Crow G, Wiles R, Heath S, Charles V (2006) Research ethics and data quality: the implications of informed consent. Int J Soc Res Methodol 9(2):83–95
Dalton M (1959) Men who manage: fusions of feeling and theory in administration. Wiley, New York
Darley JM, Batson CD (1973) From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 27(1):100–108
Darley JM, Latane B (1970) The unresponsive bystander: why doesn’t he help? Appleton Century Crofts, New York
Day K, Keys T (2008) Starving in cyberspace: a discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder websites. J Gend Stud 17(1):1–15
De Maria W (2008) Whistle blowers and organizational protestors: crossing imaginary borders. Curr Sociol 56(6):865–883
Delamont S (2009) The only honest thing: auto ethnography, reflexivity and small crises in fieldwork. Ethnogr Educ 4(1):51–63
Dingwall R (2006) Confronting the anti-democrats: the unethical nature of ethical regulation in social science. Med Sociol Online 1(1):51–58
Dingwall R (2008) The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Soc 3(1):1–12
Ekman P (1985) Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. W. W. Norton, New York
Ellis C (1999) Heartfelt autoethnography. Qual Health Res 9(5):669–683
Ellis C (2004) The ethnographic I: a methodological novel about autoethnography. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek
Ellis C (2007) Telling secrets, revealing lives: relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qual Inq 13(1):3–29
Erikson KT (1967) A comment on disguised observation in sociology. Soc Probl 14(4):366–373
Farrington DP, Knight BJ (1979) Two non-reactive field experiments on stealing from a lost letter. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 18(3):277–284
Ferrell J (1998) Criminological verstehen: inside the immediacy of crime. In: Ferrell J, Hamm MS (eds) Ethnography at the edge: crime, deviance, and field research. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp 20–43
Ferrell J, Hamm MS (1998) True confessions: crime, deviance, and field research. In: Ferrell J, Hamm MS (eds) Ethnography at the edge: crime, deviance, and field research. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp 2–20
Festinger L, Riecken H, Schachter S (1956) When prophecy fails: a social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Flick C (2016) Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Res Ethics 12(1):14–28
Frank K (2002) G-strings and sympathy: strip club regulars and male desire. Duke University Press, Durham
Gamer M, Ambach W (2014) Deception research today. Front Psychol 5:Article 256, 1–3
Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York
Goffman E (1961) Asylums: The Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Doubeday, New York
Goffman E (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behaviour. Doubleday, New York
Goffman E (1989) On fieldwork. J Contemp Ethnogr 18(2):123–132
Goldman J (2006) The ethics of spying: a reader for the intelligence professional. The Scarecrow Press, Oxford
Gøtzsche PC (1994) Is there logic in the placebo? Lancet 344:925–926
Gouldner, A (1968) The sociologist as partisan: Sociology and the welfare state. The American Sociologist 3(2):103–116
Granholm C, Svedmark E (2018) Research that hurts: ethical considerations when studying vulnerable populations online. In: Iphofen R, Tolich M (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage, London, pp 501–509
Guilleman M, Gillam L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity and ‘ethically important moments in research’. Qual Inq 10(2):261–280
Haggerty KD (2004) Ethics creep: governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qual Sociol 27(4):391–414
Hammersley M (2009) Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. Int J Soc Res Methodol 12(3):211–226
Hammersley M (2010) Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research. Sociol Res Online 15(4):16
Hammersley M, Traianou A (2012) Ethics in qualitative research: controversies and contexts. Sage, London
Haney C, Banks C, Zinbardo P (1973) Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. Int J Criminol Penol 1:69–97
Hedgecoe A (2016) Reputational risk, academic freedom and research ethics review. Sociology 50(3):486–501
Herrera CD (1997) A historical interpretation of deceptive experiments in American psychology. Hist Hum Sci 10(1):23–36
Hine C (2005) Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg, Oxford
Hobbs D, Hadfield P, Lister S, Winlow S (2003) Bouncers: violence and governance in the night-time economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Homan R (1991) The ethics of social research. Macmillan, London
Hughey MW, Daniels J (2013) Racist comments at online news sites: a methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media Cult Soc 35(3):332–347
Humphreys L (1970) Tearoom trade: impersonal sex in public places. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago
Humphreys L (1975) Tearoom trade: impersonal sex in public places. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago. (Enlarged edition)
Humphreys L (1980) Social science: ethics of research. Science 207(4432):713–714
Iphofen R (2009) Ethical decision making in social research: a practical guide. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Iphofen R (2011) Ethical decision making in qualitative research. Qual Sociol 11(4):443–446
Israel M (2015) Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: beyond regulatory compliance. Sage, London
Jane EA (2013) Beyond antifandon; cheerleading, textual hate and new media ethics. Int J Cult Stud 17(2):176–190
Korn JH (1997) Illusions of reality: a history of deception in social psychology. State University of New York Press, Albany
Langer R, Beckman SC (2005) Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited. Qual Mark Res 8(2):189–203
LaPiere RT (1934) Attitudes vs. actions. Soc Forces 13(2):230–237
Latane B, Darley JM (1969) Bystander “apathy”. Am Sci 57(2):244–268
Lawton J (2001) Gaining and maintaining consent: ethical concerns raised in a study of dying patients. Qual Health Res 11(5):693–705
Lederman R (2006) Introduction: anxious borders between work and life in a time of bureaucratic ethics regulation. Am Ethnol 33:477–481
Levine TR (ed) (2014) Encyclopedia of deception. Sage, London
Librett M, Perrone D (2010) Apples and oranges: ethnography and the IRB. Qual Res 10(6):729–747
Lichtenberg P, Heresco-Levy U, Nitzan U (2004) The ethics of the placebo in clinical practice. J Med Ethics 30(6):551–554
Loftus B, Goold B (2012) Covert surveillance and the invisibilities of policing. Criminol Crim Just 12(3):275–288
Lyng, S (1990) Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking. American Journal of Sociology 95(4):851–886
Marzano M (2007) Informed consent, deception and research freedom in qualitative research: a cross-cultural comparison. Qual Inq 13(3):417–436
Masip J, Garrido E, Herrero C (2004) Defining deception. An Psicol 20(1):147–171
Merritt CB, Fowler RG (1948) The pecuniary honesty of the public at large. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 43(1):90–93
Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority: an experimental view. Tavistock Publications, London
Milgram S (1977) Subject reaction: the neglected factor in the ethics of experimentation. Hast Cent Rep 7(5):19–23
Miller AG (2013) Baumrind’s reflections on her landmark ethical analysis of Milgram’s obedience experiments (1964): an analysis of her current views. Theor Appl Ethics 2(2):19–44
Mitchell RG Jr (1993) Secrecy and fieldwork. Sage, London
Monaghan L (2003) Danger on the doors: bodily risk in a demonised occupation. Health Risk Soc 5(1):11–31
Moore S (2018) Towards a sociology of institutional transparency: openness, deception and the problem of public trust. Sociology 52(2):416–430
Murthy D (2008) Digital ethnography: an examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology 42(5):837–855
Patrick J (1973) A Glasgow gang observed. Eyre Methuen, London
Pearson G (2009) The researcher as hooligan: where ‘participant’ observation means breaking the law. Int J Soc Res Methodol 12(3):243–255
Perry G (2013) Behind the shock machine: the untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. The New Press, New York
Pfaff T, Tiel JR (2004) Ethics of espionage. J Mil Ethics 3(1):1–15
Rambo C (2005) Impressions of grandmother: an autoethnographic portrait. J Contemp Ethnogr 34(5):560–585
Rigakos GS (2008) Nightclub: Bouncers, Risk and the Spectacle of Consumption, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Robinson WP (1996) Deceit, delusion and detection. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Rohy V (1996) Displacing desire: passing, nostalgia and Giovanni’s Room. In: Ginsberg EK (ed) Passing and the fictions of identity. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 218–233
Ronai CR, Ellis C (1989) Turn-ons for money: interactional strategies of the table dancer. J Contemp Ethnogr 18(3):271–298
Rosenhan DL (1973) On being sane in insane places. Science 179(4070):250–258
Roulet TJ, Gill MJ, Stenger S, Gill DJ (2017) Reconsidering the value of covert research: the role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organ Res Methods 20(3):487–517
Sanders B (2016) In the Club: Ecstasy Use and Supply in a London Nightclub. Sociology 39(2):241–258
Scheper-Hughes N (2004) Parts unknown: undercover ethnography of the organs-trafficking underworld. Ethnography 5(1):29–73
Scheper-Hughes N (2009) The ethics of engaged ethnography. Anthropology News, September, pp 13–14
Sharp K, Earle S (2003) Cyber punters and cyber whores: prostitution on the Internet. In: Jewkes Y (ed) Dot.cons: crime, deviance and identity on the Internet. Willan Publishing, Collumpton, pp 36–52
Shilling C, Mellor P (2015) For a sociology of deceit: doubled identities, interested actions and situational logics of opportunity. Sociology 49(4):607–623
Simmel G (1906) The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies. American Journal of Sociology 11(4):441–498
Sin CH (2005) Seeking informed consent: reflections on research practice. Sociology 39(2): 277–294
Spicker P (2011) Ethical covert research. Sociology 45(1):118–133
Tandoc EC, Lim ZW, Ling R (2018) Defining ‘fake news’. Digit Journal 6(2):137–153
Thomas SB, Quinn SC (1991) Public health then and now. Am J Public Health 81(11):1498–1505
Tolich M (2010) A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographies. Qual Health Res 20(12):1599–1610
Uz I, Kemmelmeier M (2017) Can deception be desirable? Soc Sci Inf 56(1):98–106
Van Den Hoonaard WC (2011) The seduction of ethics: transforming the social sciences. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Van Den Hoonaard WC (2016) The ethics rupture: exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review. The University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Ward J (2010) Flashback: drugs and dealing in the Golden Age of the London rave scene. Routledge, London
Whiteman N (2018) What if they’re bastards?: ethics and the imagining of the other in the study of online fan cultures. In: Iphofen R, Tolich M (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage, London, pp 510–525
Winlow S (2001) Badfellas: Crime, Tradition and New Masculinities. Berg, Oxford
Woodcock J (2016) Working the phones: control and resistance in call centres. Pluto Press, London
Zempi I (2017) Researching victimisation using auto-ethnography: wearing the Muslim veil in public. Methodol Innov 10(1):1–10
Zimbardo P (2007) The Lucifer effect: understanding how good people turn evil. Random House, New York
Zuboff S (2018) The age of surveillance: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Calvey, D. (2019). Deception. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_15-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_15-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities