Skip to main content

Work-Related Interventions to Reduce Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences ((HDBSOHS,volume 1))

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) cause considerable disability and lost productivity in many economic sectors worldwide. In fact, the most common MSD (low back pain and neck pain) rank as the first and fourth highest disability causes among noncommunicable diseases globally. Research has shown there is a strong link between work factors and MSD. The goal of this chapter is to provide an overview of work-related interventions designed to reduce the work disability burden resulting from MSD. The chapter also covers some emerging topics relevant to conducting research on MSD and work disability. The research findings described in this overview suggest that seven return-to-work principles created over a decade ago continue to be supported by the scientific literature. In particular there is consistent support for employers providing work accommodations and communication between healthcare providers and the workplace. However, there are more high-quality studies required as the available evidence regarding interventions to reduce the work disability caused by MSD is not strong. Emerging topics related to sex and gender, sitting and standing, and aging are important to MSD and work disability. The existing research evidence on these topics is equivocal; however, it is clear that workplaces must consider them in RTW and accommodation practices. More high-quality research, while challenging to conduct, would be beneficial contributing to positive workplace results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aas RW, Tuntland H, Holte KA et al (2011) Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD008160

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper BS, Haynes RB (2016) EBHC pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidance. Evid Based Med 21(4):123–125. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antle DM, Vezina N, Messing K et al (2013) Development of discomfort and vascular and muscular changes during a prolonged standing task. Occup Ergon 11(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong P, Messing K (2014) Taking gender into account in occupational health research: continuing tensions. Policy Pract Health Saf 14:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RP, Coenen E, Howie J et al (2018) A detailed description of the short-term musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of prolonged standing for office computer work. Ergonomics 61:877–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barone Gibbs B, Hergenroeder AL, Perdomo SJ et al (2018) Reducing sedentary behavior to decrease chronic low back pain: the stand back randomised trial. J Occup Environ Med 75:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros C, Carnide F, Cunha L et al (2015) Will I be able to do my work at 60? An analysis of working conditions that hinder active ageing. Work 51(3):579–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JT, Donders NCGM, Schouteten RLJ et al (2013) Age as a moderator in the relationship between work-related characteristics, job dissatisfaction and need for recovery. Ergonomics 56(6):992–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs AM, Dreinhofer KE (2017) Rehabilitation 2030: a call to action relevant to improving musculoskeletal health care globally. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47(5):297–300. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.0105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhöfer K et al (2018) Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 96(5):366–368. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.204891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder R, Blyth FM, March LM et al (2013) Placing the global burden of low back pain in context. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 27(5):575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2013.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JP, Hedge A, Yates T et al (2015) The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. Br J Sports Med 49(21):1357–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan JP, De Carvalho D, Gallagher K et al (2015) Is standing the solution to sedentary office work. Ergon Des 23(3):20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S et al (2013) The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 86(2):119–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ et al (2016) Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Ther 24(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H et al (2010) Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 32(8):607–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clendon J, Walker L (2016) The juxtaposition of ageing and nursing: the challenges and enablers of continuing to work in the latter stages of a nursing career. J Adv Nurs 72(5):1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen P, Willenberg L, Parry S et al (2017) Associations of occupational standing with musculoskeletal symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 52(3):176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote JN (2012) A critical review on physical factors and functional characteristics that may explain a sex/gender difference in work-related neck/shoulder disorders. Ergonomics 55:173–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cote D, Coutu MF (2010) A critical review of gender issues in understanding prolonged disability related to musculoskeletal pain: how are they relevant to rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 32:87–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A et al (2018) Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil 28(1):1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield SJ, Ellis BM, Goodson N et al (2017) The contribution of musculoskeletal disorders in multimorbidity: implications for practice and policy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 31(2):129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2017.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fillingham RB, Edwards RR, Powell T (1999) The relationship of sex and clinical pain to experimental pain responses. Pain 83:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J et al (2005) Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):607–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frot M, Feine JS, Buchnell MC (2004) Sex differences in pain perception and anxiety. A psychophysical study with topical capsaicin. Pain 108:230–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2018) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392:1789–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gensby U, Labriola M, Irvin E et al (2014) A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 24(2):220–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9437-x

  • Gonzalez I, Morer P (2016) Ergonomics for the inclusion of older workers in the knowledge workforce and a guidance tool for designers. Appl Ergon 53(Pt A):131–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guest M, Boggess MM, Viljoen DA et al (2014) Age-related injury and compensation claim rates in heavy industry. Occup Med 64(2):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg M, Silverstein B, Wells R et al (1995) Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs): a reference book for prevention. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldeman S, Nordin M, Chou R et al (2018) The Global Spine Care Initiative: World Spine Care executive summary on reducing spine-related disability in low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J 27(Suppl 6):776–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5722-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtermann A, Mathiassen SE, Straker L (2018) Promoting health and physical capacity during productive work: the Goldilocks Principle. Scand J Work Environ Health 45:90. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy D, Geere JA, Davatchi F et al (2014) A time for action: opportunities for preventing the growing burden and disability from musculoskeletal conditions in low- and middle-income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 28(3):377–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2014.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SL, Seymour RB, Campbell RT et al (2011) Comparison of two health-promotion programs for older workers. Am J Public Health 101(5):883–890. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300082

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Human Resources & Skills Development Canada (2011) National occupational classification career handbook. Government of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Torres P et al (2018) The Global Spine Care Initiative: a systematic review of individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in rural populations in low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J 27(Suppl 6):802–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5393-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Work & Health (2008) Seven ‘principles’ for successful return to work. Institute for Work & Health, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Work & Health (2017) Seven “principles” used in return-to-work policies and practices. IWH case impact study. Available via https://www.iwh.on.ca/impact-case-studies/seven-principles-guidelines-used-in-return-to-work-policies-and-practices. Accessed 10 Oct 2018

  • Irvin E, Van Eerd D, Amick BC et al (2010) Introduction to special section: systematic reviews for prevention and management of musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 20(2):123–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CD, Haldeman S, Chou R et al (2018) The Global Spine Care Initiative: model of care and implementation. Eur Spine J 27(Suppl 6):925–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5720-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koolhaas W, Groothoff JW, de Boer MR et al (2015) Effectiveness of a problem-solving based intervention to prolong the working life of ageing workers. BMC Public Health 15:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1410-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Korshoj M, Jorgensen MB, Hallman DM et al (2018) Prolonged sitting at work is associated with a favorable time course of low-back pain among blue-collar workers: a prospective study in the DPhacto cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health 44:530–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen TS (2005) Intervention studies in occupational epidemiology. Occup Environ Med 62:205–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Laisne F, Lecomte C, Corbiere M (2012) Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 34:355–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le P, Marras WS (2016) Evaluating the low back biomechanics of three different office workstations: seated, standing, and perching. Appl Ergon 56:170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P et al (2001) Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Appl Ergon 32(1):53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL et al (2006) Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:257–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen M, Silvennoinen M, Nousiainen T (2017) To sit or to stand, that is the question: examining the effects of work posture change on the well-being at work of software professionals. Int J Networking Virtual Organ 17:371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel L, Malenfant EC, Morency JD et al (2012) Projected trends to 2031 for the Canadian labour force. Statistics Canada, Ottawa. Available via: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-010-x/2011008/part-partie3-eng.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2018

  • McMaster University (2016) Resources for evidence-based practice: the 6S pyramid. http://hsl.mcmaster.libguides.com/ebm. Accessed 10 Oct 2018

  • Monteiro MS, Alexandre NMC, Ilmarinen J et al (2009) Work ability and musculoskeletal disorders among workers from a public health institution. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 15(3):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M et al (2016) New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med 21(4):125–127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001) Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: low back and upper extremities. National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann WP, Eklund J, Hansson B et al (2010) Effect assessment in work environment interventions: a methodological reflection. Ergonomics 53(1):130–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903349914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer KT, Harris EC, Linaker C (2012) Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(2):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt-Catsouphes M, James JB, Matz-Costa C (2015) Workplace-based health and wellness programs: the intersection of aging, work, and health. Gerontologist 55(2):262–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pransky GS, Benjamin KL, Savageau JA et al (2005) Outcomes in work-related injuries: a comparison of older and younger workers. Am J Ind Med 47(2):104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riethmeister V, Brouwer S, van der Klink J et al (2016) Work, eat and sleep: towards a healthy ageing at work program offshore. BMC Public Health 16(1):134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rivilis I, Van Eerd D, Cullen K et al (2008) Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review. Appl Ergon 39(3):342–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider E, Irastorza X (2010) OSH in figures: work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU – facts and figures. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Settersten RA, Mayer KU (1997) The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annu Rev Sociol 23:233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein B, Evanoff B (2011) Musculoskeletal disorders. In: Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL et al (eds) Occupational and environmental health: recognizing and preventing disease and injury. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 335–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PM, Berecki-Gisolf J (2014) Age, occupational demands and the risk of serious work injury. Occup Med 64(8):571–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PM, Bielecky A, Mustard CA et al (2013) The relationship between age and work injury in British Columbia: examining differences across time and nature of injury. J Occup Health 55(2):98–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Chen C, Mustard C et al (2014a) Examining the relationship between chronic conditions, multi-morbidity and labour market participation in Canada: 2000 to 2005. Ageing Soc 34(10):1730–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Bielecky A, Ibrahim S et al (2014b) Impact of pre-existing chronic conditions on age differences in sickness absence after a musculoskeletal work injury: a path analysis approach. Scand J Work Environ Health 40(2):167–175. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Bielecky A, Ibrahim S et al (2014c) How much do pre-existing chronic conditions contribute to age differences in health care expenditures following a work-related musculoskeletal injury? Med Care 52:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Ma H, Gilbert-Ouimet M et al (2018) The relationship between occupational standing and sitting and incident heart disease over a 12-year period in Ontario, Canada. Am J Epidemiol 187(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2010) Estimates of population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (CANSIM Table 051-0001). Statistics Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedmon AW, Howells H, Wilson JR et al (2012) Ergonomics/human factors needs of an ageing workforce in the manufacturing sector. Health Promot Perspect 2(2):112–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterns HL, Doverspike D (1989) Aging and the retraining and learning process in organisations. In: Goldstein I, Katze R (eds) Training and development in work organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 299–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Strazdins L, Bammer G (2004) Women, work and musculoskeletal health. Soc Sci Med 58:997–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tornqvist EW, Hagberg M, Hagman M et al (2009) The influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(6):689–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2012) Ageing in the twenty-first century: a celebration and a challenge. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)/HelpAge International, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eerd D, Cole DC, Steenstra IA (2016) Chapter 16: participatory ergonomics for return to work. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ (eds) Handbook of return to work: from research to practice. Springer, New York, pp 289–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC et al (2015) Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):CD006955

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Prada S, Demou E, Lalloo D et al (2016) Effectiveness of very early workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 42(4):261–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk K, Luijsterburg PA, Miedema HS et al (2012) Prognostic factors for recovery in chronic nonspecific low back pain: asystematic review. Phys Ther 92(9):1093–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T et al (2017) Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD011618

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M et al (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2163–2196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wells R, Van Eerd D, Hagg G (2004) Mechanical exposure concepts using force as the agent. Scand J Work Environ Health 30(3):179–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whalin C, Ekberg K, Persson J et al (2013) Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients. J Occup Rehabil 23(1):32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick B 3rd et al (2016) Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a comparison of scientific literature, grey literature and stakeholder observations. J Occup Rehabil 26(4):417–433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba (2014) Manitoba workplace injury and illness statistics 2000–2013. Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Available from http://www.wcb.mb.ca/sites/default/files/resources/annualInjurystats2000_2013%20v3.1.pdf

  • Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (2013) Workers’ Compensation Board of Nova Scotia 2013 Annual Report. Workers’ Compensation Board of Nova Scotia, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) (2013) By the numbers: 2013 WSIB statistical report (schedule 1). Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • WorkSafeBC (2013) WorkSafeBC 2013 statistics. Vancouver: WorkSafeBC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2003) Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. In: Protecting workers’ health series. World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health WHO press. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dwayne Van Eerd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Van Eerd, D., Smith, P. (2020). Work-Related Interventions to Reduce Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Disorders. In: Bültmann, U., Siegrist, J. (eds) Handbook of Disability, Work and Health. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75381-2_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75381-2_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75381-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75381-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics