Skip to main content

Craniofacial Characteristics of Saudi Adults

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World

Abstract

This chapter presents a comprehensive review of craniofacial morphometric highlights and examines gender dimorphism in Saudi Arabia. Ethnicity, hard tissue, soft tissue, and dental features are important features to be considered, particularly in orthodontic and orthognathic medical procedures. Lateral cephalometric radiographs for craniofacial and dental investigation provide insights on skeletal structure connections and connections between skeletal structures with the teeth and facial soft tissue structures. The lateral cephalometric radiographs help orthodontists to focus on current facial structures and anticipate future facial development when arranging a treatment plan for the patient. Diverse assortments of cephalometric examination provide total craniofacial morphometric data whereby it incorporates hard tissue, soft tissue, and dental structures according to racial classifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References 

  • AAPA (1996) AAPA statement on biological aspects of race. Am J Phys Anthropol 101:569–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdul Aziz NS, Talib MA, Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Rahman SA (2014) Linear and angular cephalometric lip morphology in Malaysian Chinese population. Int Med J 20(1):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2012a) Cephalometric evaluation for Bangladeshi adult by Steiner analysis. Int Med J 19:262–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Kathiravan P, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2012b) Cephalometric evaluation for Bangladeshi adult by Down’s analysis. Int Med J 19(3):258–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2012c) Cephalometric norm study in a Bangladeshi population using McNamara analysis. Int Med J 20(1):84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2012d) Determining cephalometric norms for Bangladeshi adult using Bjork-Jarabaks’ analysis. Int Med J 19(4):329–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2012e) A soft tissue cephalometric analysis for Bangladeshi adult using Holdaway’s analysis. Int Med J 19:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2013a) Craniofacial morphology of Bangladeshi adult using Tweed’s and Wit’s analysis. Int Med J 20(2):197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2013b) Cephalometric norms in Bangladeshi adults using Harvold’s analysis. Int Med J 20:92–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M, Iida J (2013c) Cephalometric lip morphology in Bangladeshi population. Int Med J 20:201–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Rahman SA, Shaari R, Haq ME (2013d) Cephalometric for orthognathic surgery (COGS) for Bangladeshi population. Int Med J 20(3):345–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Talib MA, Abdul Aziz NS, Basri R, Purmal K, Rahman SA (2014a) Comparison of linear and angular cephalometric lip morphology in Malaysian Malay and Malaysian Chinese population. Int Med J 21(2):177–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Muraoka R, Nakano K, Okafuji N (2014b) Validity of W angle and YEN angle in a sample from Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations. J Hard Tissue Biol 23:351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Nowrin SA, Shahid F, Haque S, Basri R (2014c) Cephalometric characteristics of Bangladeshi adults with class II malocclusion. Int Res J Med Sci 2(11):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Nowrin SA, Yusof A, Ahmad B (2015) Changes of lip morphology in relation to different skeletal index: in Malaysian Malay and Malaysian Chinese population. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 6(2):770–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Begum S, Sikder MA, Saifuddin M (2016a) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Bangladeshi adults: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):411–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016b) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):414–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016c) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):417–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016d) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):420–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016e) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):428–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016f) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):431–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016g) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies in Malay population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):434–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Siddiki MN, Basri R, Harun KMAL, Mat Arifin MNA, Kamarazaman KB (2016h) Assessment of sagittal discrepancies between Malay and Pakistani population: latest and old approaches. Int Med J 23(4):424–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Iberahim NFB, Mukai A, Imanishi T, Yusa T, Roszali NHB, Haque S, Basri R (2016i) Sagittal and vertical occlusal cephalometric analyses of Pancherz among Malaysian Malays and Malaysian Chinese. J Hard Tissue Biol 25(4):403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MK, Nowrin SA, Shahid F, Basri R, Qamaruddin I, Rahman NA (2016j) Determining cephalometric characteristics of Bangladeshi adults with class III malocclusion. Int Med J 23(5):572–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azemi R, Ã…rtun J (2012) Posteroanterior cephalometric norms for an adolescent Kuwaiti population. Eur J Orthod 34:312–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AlBarakati SF (2011) Soft tissue facial profile of adult Saudies Lateral cephalometric analysis. Saudi Med J 32:836–842

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AlBarakati SF, Talic NF (2007) Cephalometric norms for Saudi sample using McNamara analysis. Saudi Dent J 19:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Deaij A (2001) Characteristics of dentofacial deformities in a Saudi population. Saudi Dent J 13:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Gunaid T, Yamada K, Yamaki M, Saito I (2007) Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:e7–e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jame B, Artun J, Al-Azemi R, Behbehani F, Buhamra S (2006) Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: hard tissue measurements. Med Princ Pract 15:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jasser NM (2000) Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial variations in normal Saudi population according to Steiner analysis. Saudi Med J 21:746–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jasser NM (2005) Cephalometric evaluation for Saudi population using the Downs and Steiner analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 6:52–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alshahrani I, Abdullah Kamran M, Alhaizaey A, Abumelha N (2018) Evaluation of skeletal variations and establishment of cephalometric norms in Saudi sub population using Bjork Jarabak’s analysis. Pak J Med Sci 34(5):1104–1109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Angle EH (1907) Malocclusion of the teeth, 7th edn. SS White Dental Mfg Co, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou A (1997) Orthodontic cephalometry. Mosby-Wolfe, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Averistus G, Abdul Razak NH, Alam MK (2019) Cephalometric for orthognathic surgery (COGS): determination of values applicable to Malaysian Malay and Chinese population. Arch Orofac Sci 14(1):40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahaa O, Khamis MF, Alam MK, Mokhtar N (2014) Comparative cephalometric analysis between class III and class I malocclusion of Malay females. Int Med J 21(3):283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishara SE, Abdalla EM, Hoppens BJ (1990) Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 97:413–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishara SE, Jacobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE (1998) Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114:698–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork A (1948) The face in profile. Am J Orthod 34:691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent BH (1931) A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1:45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie AG, Downs W, Goldstein A, Myer E (1938) Cephalometric appraisal of orthodontic results. Angle Orthod 8:261–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukhary MT (2005) Comparative cephalometric study of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Japanese adult females. J Oral Sci 47:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstone CJ (1980) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:744–751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA (1978) Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 36:269–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan GK (1972) A cephalometric appraisal of the Chinese (Cantonese). Am J Orthod 61:279–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner AM, Moshiri R (1985) Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod 87:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke MS, Wei SHY (1988) Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 10:264–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coon CS, Garn SM, Bersill JB (1950) Races: a study of the problems of race formation in man. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF (1993) Perceptions of balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104:180–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downs WB (1948) Variations in facial relationship. Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 34:812–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eickstedt EV (1926) The race and types of the Western Himalayas. Man in India 6:237

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas LG (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G (1993) Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103:327–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay LM (1980) Craniometry and cephalometry: a history prior to the advent of radiography. Angle Orthod 50(4):312–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn TR, Ambrogio RI, Zeichner SJ (1989) Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner LD (1974) Soft tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 66:367–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gavan JA, Washburn SL, Lewis PH (1952) Photography: an anthropometric tool. Am J Phys Anthropol 10:331–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoret J (2003) Orthodontics and orthognathic surgery diagnosis and treatment planning. Ch.6: 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess MB, Solzer WV (1989) Computer treatment estimates in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. J Clin Orthod 23:262–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajighadimi M, Dougherty HL, Garakani F (1981) Cephalometric evaluation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed’s and Steiner’s standards. Am J Orthod 79:192–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajni K, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Lee ST, Venkatadri G (1994) Racial and ethnic morphometric differences in the craniofacial complex. In: Farkas LG (ed) Anthropometry of the head and face. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan AM, Rock WP (2001) Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population. J Orthod 28(4):297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim HA (2003) A cephalometric study of soft tissue relationship among Saudi female dental students. Saudi Dent J 15:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim HA, AlBarakati SF (2003) Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2:60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AH (2006) Cephalometric norms for Saudi adults living in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Angle Orthod 76:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway RA (1983) A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 84:1–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1870) On the geographical distribution of the chief modifications of mankind. J Ethnol Soc Lond 2:404–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SA, Mohammad PA, Tariq J, Khan F, Khursheed T, Jehan S, Alam MK, Qamruddin I (2017a) Cephalometric study of Pakistani population using McNamara analysis. Int Med J 24(1):144–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan F, Mahroof V, Kamran MA, Shafiqullah, Alam MK, Qamruddin I (2017b) Cephalometric lip morphology in a sample from Pakistani population. Int Med J 24(1):140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundi I, Harshal K, Alam MK (2019) Determination of craniofacial morphometry of Saudi adults by Steiner’s analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 13(1):ZC45–ZC48

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlade M (1993) Diagnóstico ortodôntico, 3rd edn. Ed Santos, São Paulo, pp 129–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew KK, Soh G, Loh E (1992) Ranking of facial profiles among Asians. J Esthet Dent 4:128–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malik H, Afridi SK, Kamran MA, Mahroof V, Alam MK, Qamruddin I (2017) A cephalometric analysis for Pakistani adults using Jarabak Bjork’s analysis. Int Med J 24(1):128–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD (2000) Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self perceptions in 14-15 year-old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester. Eur J Orthod 21:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JG (1964) Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psychol 63:59–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JA (1984) A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 86:449–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield LL (1966) The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 52:804–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills JR (1982) Principles and practice of orthodontics. Churchill Livingstone/Longman Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima K, McNamara JA, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T (1996) Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:431–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyers RE, Bookstein FL, Hunter WS (1988) Analysis of the craniofacial skeleton: cephalometrics. In: Moyers RE (ed) Handbook of orthodontics. Year Book Medical, Chicago, pp 247–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Namankani EA, Bukhary M (2005) Cephalometric craniofacial characteristics of a sample of Saudi female adults with class III malocclusion. Saudi Dent J 17:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda R, Nanda R (1969) Cephalometric study of dentofacial complex of North Indians. Angle Orthod 39:2–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashashibi I, Shaikh H, Sarhan O (1990) Cephalometric norms of Saudi boys. Saudi Dent J 2:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Neger MA (1995) A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod 45:738–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nor Farid Mohd N, Basri R, Alam MK, Haque S, Hao Melvin SJ, Talib MA (2020) Soft tissue cephalometric measurements among Malaysian Malays and Chinese. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatr Clin Integr 20:e4978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey AK (2006) Cephalo-facial variation among Onges. Anthropologist 8(4):245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell N, Humphreys B (1984) Proportions of the esthetic face. Thieme Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffit WR, Fields HW (2000) Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Purmal K, Alam MK, Zam Z, Mohammad N (2013a) Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Chinese. Int Med J 20:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Purmal K, Alam MK, Zam Z, Mohammad N (2013b) Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Indian. Int Med J 20:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Purmal K, Alam MK, Zam Z, Mohammad N (2013c) Cephalometric comparison of skeletal, dental, soft tissue, nose and chin prominence between Malaysian Indian and Malaysian Chinese. Int Med J 20:335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Qamaruddin I, Alam MK (2015) Cephalometry: is it just an orthodontic record? Bangladesh J Med Sci 14(4):313–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qamaruddin I, Alam MK, Shahid F, Tanveer S, Umer M, Amin E (2018) Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability. Saudi Dent J 30(1):43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radovic Z, Muretic Z, Nemirovskij V, Gazi-Coklica V (2000) Craniofacial variations in a south Dalmatian population. Acta Stomatol Croat 34(4):399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson ER (1980) Racial differences in dimensional traits of the human face. Angle Orthod 50(4):301–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts RA (1960) The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod 30:103–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts RM (1981) Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 51:115–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DF (1956) Industrial applications of body measurements. Am Anthropol 58:526–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos N (1977) Soft tissue changes in class II treatment. Am J Orthod 72:165–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin Saglam AM, Gazilerli U (2001) Analysis of Holdaway soft tissue measurement in children between 9 and 12 years of age. Eur J Orthod 23:287–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarhan OA, Nashashibi IA (1988) A comparative study between two randomly selected samples from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurements. J Oral Rehabil 15:251–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shafi AM, Khan FNA, Khan AG, Nadeem M, Khursheed T, Jehan S, Qamaruddin I, Alam MK (2018) A soft tissue cephalometric analysis for Pakistani adult using Holdaway’s analysis. Int Med J 25(1):51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalhoub SY, Sarhan OA, Shaikh HS (1987) Adult cephalometric norms for Saudi Arabians with a comparison of values for Saudi and North American Caucasians. Br J Orthod 14:273–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shokor FFBA, Rahman WSB, Alam MK (2015) Craniofacial morphology with genetic influence of ABO blood group in Malaysian orthodontic patients. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 6(4):412–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddika A, Rahman SA, Alam MK (2020) Ricketts’ cephalometric analysis for Saudi population. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatr Clin Integr 20:e5364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HM, Chiszar D, Montanucci RR (1997) Subspecies and classification. Herpetol Rev 28:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner CC (1953) Cephalometric for you and me. Am J Orthod 39:729–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner MM (1955) A photometric analysis of the facial profile. Am J Orthod 41:453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subtelny JD (1961) The soft tissue profile, growth, and treatment changes. Angle Orthod 31:105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Talib MA, Abdul Aziz NS, Alam MK, Basri R, Purmal K, Rahman SA (2014) Linear and angular cephalometric measurement of lip morphology among Malaysian Malay. Int Med J 21:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed CH (1954) The Frankfort-mandibular-incisal angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24:121–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesato G, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T, Koyama I, Nakanishi Y (1978) Steiner cephalometric norms for Japanese and Japanese-Americans. Am J Orthod 73:321–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl N (2006) Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 7: facial analysis before the advent of the cephalometer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Khursheed Alam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Alam, M.K., Siddika, A., Ab Rahman, S., Siddiqui, A.A., Ilyas, M. (2020). Craniofacial Characteristics of Saudi Adults. In: Laher, I. (eds) Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74365-3_209-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74365-3_209-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74365-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74365-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics