Abstract
The role of language in communication cannot be underestimated even if language can be a hindrance to disseminating and accessing information. There are many language issues in the “new” long-term global phenomenon and study of climate change including global warming as well as weather forecasting, mapping, and reporting. Symbols are widely used as a language, a means of communication in mapping and depicting weather elements through the use of maps. All these symbols which show weather/meteorological elements have specific scientific meaning. The concept of weather is equally understood among the ordinary public across different countries and background. However, it is not the case with climate change. Therefore, much is still to be done in the area of climate change. What happens when this kind of information is disseminated and communicated about in other contexts, involving economists and politicians, media, and the general public? Much effort has been done to connect different nations to common knowledge on climate change, but the question remains: Is the understanding common? One of the many reasons for understanding not to be common is language. With the same understanding but different languages, we can tell different “stories.” The meaning that people ascribe to climate change is closely related to how climate change is portrayed in communication. Our understanding is also influenced by overarching international debates. New multidisciplinary approach on climate change research needs to be incorporated to close this gap. This calls for the integration of linguistics, thus enabling policy-makers to communicate at the local as well as at a global scale about what needs to be done and to develop relevant, rigorous, climate-smart, and more action-oriented policies. Inappropriate use of language and terminologies, misconceptions related to weather and climate change, climate change perceptions and communication as well as recommendations thereof are discussed.
References
Africa Talks Climate. (2010). Executive summary research report: The public understanding of climate change in ten countries. BBC World Service Trust.
Brechin, S. R., & Bhandari, M. (2011). Perceptions of climate change worldwide. WIREs-Climate Change, 2, 871–855.
Budescu, D. V., Broomell, S., & Por, H. (2009). Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychological Science, 20(3), 299–308.
Carvalho, A. (2010). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1(Juanuary/February), 172–179.
Dahl, T. (2011). Communicating about climate change: Linguistic analysis of climate texts. Journal of Professional Communication, 26, 69–74.
Dunlap, R. E. (1998). Lay perceptions of global risk – Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology, 13, 473–498.
Fleming, G. (2005). Guidelines on weather broadcasting and the use of radio for the delivery of weather information. World Meteorological Organisation, WMO/TD No. 1278.
Fløttum, K. (2014). Linguistic mediation of climate change discourse. ASp, 65, 1–11.
Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T. (2012). Different contexts, different “stories”? A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Language and Communication, 32, 14–23.
Fløttum, K., & Gjerstad, Ø. (2013). Arguing for climate change policy through the linguistic construction of narratives and voices: The case of the south-African green paper “National Climate Change Response”. Climatic Change, 118, 417–430.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2007). “What is language?” An introduction to language (8th ed.). Boston: Thomson Wardsworth.
Harvey, B., Ensor, J., Carlile, L., Garside, B., Patterson, Z., & Naess, L. O. (2012). Climate change communication and social learning – Review and strategy development for CCAFS Working Paper No. 22. Copenhagen: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and food Security (CCAFS).
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Johnson, B. (2011). Climate change communication: A provocative inquiry into motives, meanings, and means. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 973–991
Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 2728, 1–10.
Leiserowitz, A. (2007a). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images and interpretive communities. In S. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change (pp. 44–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leiserowitz, A. A. (2007b). Human development report 2007/2008. Human Development Office.
Leiss, W. (2004). Effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 149, 399–404.
Moser, S. (2004). Climate change and the sustainability transition: The role of communication and social change. IHDP update (Newsletter of the Int. Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change), 4, 18–19.
Moser, S. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process, and future direction. WIREs Climate Change, 1(January/February), 31.
Moser, S., & Dilling, L. (2004). Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 46(10), 32–46.
Moser, S., & Dilling, L. (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. New York: Cambridge Press.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2005). Federal meteorological handbook no. 1, Surface weather observations and reports (FMH-1). Washington, DC.
Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. WIREs Climate Change, 1(January/February), 97.
Nisbet, C. M. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12–23.
Patt, A., & Schrag, D. (2003). Using specific language to describe risk and probability. Climatic Change, 61, 17–30.
Russill, C., & Nyssa, Z. (2009). The tipping point in climate change communication. Global Environmental Change, 19, 336–344.
Times of Swaziland. (2015). Weather report. Mbabane: African Echo (Pty) Ltd.
Times of Swaziland. (2016). Weather report. Mbabane: African Echo (Pty) Ltd.
Villa, A., & Krosnick, J. A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change, 105, 1–2), 1–12.
Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261–283.
Wolf, J., & Moser, S. C. (2011). Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world. WIREs Climate Change Advanced Review, 2, 547.
Zehr, S. C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 85–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ndzabandzaba, C. (2018). Language Issues in Weather Forecasts, Reporting, and Climate Change. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_66-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_66-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences