Abstract
Plants have been conversation topics since the origins of human language. The idea that plants actively communicate, however, is quite recent and remains controversial. This chapter surveys evidence for plant communication, organizing it under four heuristic labels. Prosaic evidence comes from ecological sciences and shows that plants transmit expositive information to other organisms about environmental and individual conditions. Prosaic communication seems evolutionarily inevitable. Poetic evidence suggests that plants transmit evocative information to other organisms. Poetic communication arises partly from physiological processes but may necessitate the existence of mind in beings that receive such communication. Poetic evidence merges with psychedelic evidence, which suggests plants can communicate directly with human and, potentially, animal minds. Psychedelic communication implies the existence of a global consciousness, a concept pursued in fringe science. Paranormal evidence extends from the psychedelic and suggests that plants are fully sentient beings. Paranormal evidence is supported by pseudoscience, although some religious traditions also consider plants to be sentient beings. The chapter concludes that evidence for plant communication challenges dominant philosophies of thought and being: how to bound (or unbound) the human within nature; how to demarcate knowledge from nonsense; and how to consider nonhumans within moral frameworks.
Keywords
References
Alpi, A., Amrhein, N., Bertl, A., Blatt, M. R., Blumwald, E., Cervone, F., Dainty, J., De Michelis, M. I., Epstein, E., Galston, A. W., Goldsmith, M. H. M., Hawes, C., Hell, R., Hetherington, A., Hofte, H., Juergens, G., Leaver, C. J., Moroni, A., Murphy, A., Oparka, K., Perata, P., Quader, H., Rausch, T., Ritzenthaler, C., Rivetta, A., Robinson, D. G., Sanders, D., Scheres, B., Schumacher, K., Sentenac, H., Slayman, C. L., Soave, C., Somerville, C., Taiz, L., Thiel, G., & Wagner, R. (2007). Plant neurobiology: No brain, no gain? Trends in Plant Science, 12(4), 135–136.
Backster, C. (1968). Evidence of primary perception in plant life. International Journal of Parapsychology, 10(4), 329–348.
Backster, C. (2003). Primary perception: Biocommunication with plants, living foods, and human cells. Anza: White Rose Millennium Press.
Baluska, F., Mancuso, S., Volkmann, D., & Barlow, P. W. (2009). The ‘root-brain’ hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin: Revival after more than 125 years. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 4(12), 1121–1127.
Bose, J. C. (1929). Growth and tropic movement of plants. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Brenner, E. D., Stahlberg, R., Mancuso, S., Baluska, F., & Van Volkenburgh, E. (2007). Response to Alpi et al.: Plant neurobiology: The gain is more than the name. Trends in Plant Science, 12(7), 285–286.
Brightman, M., Grotti, V., & Ulturgasheva, O. (Eds.). (2012). Animism in rainforest and tundra: Personhood, animals, plants, and things in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
Bringlismark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 422–433.
Broom, D. M. (2014). Sentience and animal welfare. Oxfordshire: CABI.
Brown, C. M. (2016). Jagadish Chandra Bose and vedantic science. In Y. Fehige (Ed.), Science and religion: East and west (pp. 104–122). London: Routledge.
Bruce, T. J., Wadhams, L. J., & Woodcock, C. M. (2005). Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science, 10(6), 269–274.
Calvo Garzón, P., & Keijzer, F. (2011). Plants: Adaptive behavior, root-brains, and minimal cognition. Adaptive Behavior, 19(3), 155–171.
Carroll, R. T. (2015). The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR). The Skeptic’s dictionary. Retrieved July, 4, 2016 from http://skepdic.com/pear.html
Cooke, S. J., Sack, L., Franklin, C. E., Farrell, A. P., Beardall, J., Wikelski, M., & Chown, S. L. (2013). What is conservation physiology? Perspectives on an increasingly integrated and essential science. Conservation Physiology, 1, 1–23.
Darwin, C. (1880). The power of movement in plants. London: John Murray.
Dietrich, L., & Körner, C. (2014). Thermal imaging reveals massive heat accumulation in flowers across a broad spectrum of alpine taxa. Alpine Botany, 124(1), 27–35.
Doyle, R. M. (2011). Darwin’s pharmacy: Sex, plants and the evolution of the noosphere. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Drescher, M. R. (2015). The seduction of understanding: Notes on the realities of poetry, science and floriography. In A.-S. Jürgens & T. Tesche (Eds.), LaborARTorium (pp. 213–227). Bielefeld: transcript.
Fenchel, T. (2002). The origin and early evolution of life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Galston, A. W., & Slayman, C. L. (1979). The not-so-secret life of plants: In which the historical and experimental myths about emotional communication between animal and vegetable are put to rest. American Scientist, 67(3), 337–344.
Greenaway, K. (1884). Language of flowers. London: Routledge & Sons.
Hall, M. (2011). Plants as persons: A philosophical botany. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Han, K.-T. (2007). Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 529–556.
Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.
Harris, R. J., & Reed, J. M. (2002). Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 39, 275–290.
Jäger, C. (2008). Noosphere. In S. E. Jørgensen & B. D. Fath (Eds.), Global ecology (pp. 80–83). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Kalan, A. K., Mundry, R., & Boesch, C. (2015). Wild chimpanzees modify food call structure with respect to tree size for a particular fruit species. Animal Behaviour, 101, 1–9.
Karban, R. (2015). Plant sensing and communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Karban, R., & Maron, J. (2002). The fitness consequences of interspecific eavesdropping between plants. Ecology, 83(5), 1209–1213.
Kaufman, A. J., & Lohr, V. I. (2008). Does it matter what color tree you plant? Acta Horticulturae, 790, 179–184.
Kinnersley, A. M., & Turano, F. J. (2000). Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and plant responses to stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19(6), 479–509.
Labate, B. C., & Cavnar, C. (2016). Peyote: History, tradition, politics, and conservation. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Leonard, A. S., & Papaj, D. R. (2011). X marks the spot: The possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Functional Ecology, 25(6), 1293–1301.
Lev-Yadun, S. (2003). Why do some thorny plants resemble green zebras? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224, 483–489.
Li, Q. (2010). Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 9–17.
Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: A new look at life on earth (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010.
Mancuso, S., & Viola, A. (2015). Brilliant green: The surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Nagel, A. H. M. (1997). Are plants conscious? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(3), 215–230.
Nelson, R. D. (2013). The global consciousness project: Meaningful patterns in random data. In S. Krippner, A. J. Rock, J. Beischel, H. L. Friedman, & C. L. Fracasso (Eds.), Advances in parapsychological research (Vol. 9, pp. 15–37). Jefferson: McFarland & Co.
Orians, G. H., & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). New York: Oxford University Press.
Panksepp, J. (2011). Toward a cross-species neuroscientific understanding of the affective mind: Do animals have emotional feelings? American Journal of Primatology, 73(6), 545–561.
Pate, D. W. (1994). Chemical ecology of Cannabis. Journal of the International Hemp Association, 2(29), 32–37.
Pelizzon, A., & Gagliano, M. (2015). The sentience of plants: Toward a new regime of plant rights, or the intersection of animal rights and rights of nature? Australian Animal Protection Law Journal, 11, 5–13.
Pitt, D., & Samson, P. R. (Eds.). (1999). The biosphere and noosphere reader: Global environment, society and change. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Pollan, M. (2001). The botany of desire: A plant’s eye view of the world. New York: Random House.
Raguso, R. A. (2004). Flowers as sensory billboards: Progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7, 434–440.
Samorini, G. (2002). Animals and psychedelics: The natural world and the instinct to alter consciousness. Rochester: Park Street Press.
Satterlie, R. A. (2011). Do jellyfish have central nervous systems? Journal of Experimental Biology, 214, 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.043687.
Schaefer, H. M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2011). Plant-animal communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schmithausen, L. (1991). The problem of the sentience of plants in earliest Buddhism. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Siegel, R. K. (2005). Intoxication: The universal drive for mind-altering substances (2nd ed.). Rochester: Park Street Press.
Smith, A. F. (2016). A critique of the moral defense of vegetarianism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sugiyama, A., & Yazaki, K. (2012). Root exudates of legume plants and their involvement in interactions with soil microbes. In J. M. Vivanco & F. Baluska (Eds.), Secretions and exudates in biological systems. Berlin: Springer.
Thellier, M., & Lüttge, U. (2012). Plant memory: A tentative model. Plant Biology, 15, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00674.x.
Tompkins, P., & Bird, C. (1973). The secret life of plants. New York: Harper & Row.
Trewavas, A. (2007). Response to Alpi et al.: Plant neurobiology – All metaphors have value. Trends in Plant Science, 12(6), 231–233.
Trewavas, A. (2014). Plant behaviour and intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsing, A. (2012). Unruly edges: Mushrooms as companion species. Environmental Humanities, 1, 141–154.
Tucker, A. O., & Tucker, S. S. (1988). Catnip and the catnip response. Economic Botany, 42, 214–231.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.
Vieira, P., Gagliano, M., & Ryan, J. C. (Eds.). (2016). The green thread: Dialogues with the vegetal world. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Wiley, R. H. (1983). The evolution of communication: Information and manipulation. In T. R. Hallieday & S. PJB (Eds.), Animal behaviour, Vol. 2, Communication (pp. 156–189). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Yoon, C. K. (2011, March 15). No face, but plants like life too. New York Times, p. D4.
Yu, D. W. (2001). Parasites of mutualisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72, 529–546.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Duvall, C.S. (2018). Prosaic, Poetic, Psychedelic, and Paranormal Communications of Plants. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_30-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_30-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences