Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Language Endangerment: Diversity and Specificities of Native American Languages of Oklahoma

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Changing World Language Map

  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Native American languages have faced more than half a millennium of decline, and efforts at revitalization and revival have drawn the attention of scholars, community leaders, and policymakers from around the country and world. With one of the highest numbers of federally recognized Native American tribes, a large number of Native American languages, and one of the highest proportions of Native American language speakers, Oklahoma presents a perfect case study for examining the causes and effects of Native American language decline as well as the successes and limitations of revitalization programs. Drawing on Fishman’s Expanded Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale, and discussing the theory of language ideology, this article argues that for many Oklahoma tribes, the goals of language remediation may be starkly different from what non-native linguists and anthropologists prescribe for them. Though this study finds some examples of relative growth and success in Native American language revitalization and a shift in the language policies of the state of Oklahoma, it ultimately rests with each Native American community to decide for itself what constitutes success given its contextual and demographic limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, D., & LeCompte, M. D. (2007). Resiliency in native languages: The tale of three indigenous communities’ successful experiences with language immersion [Special Issue]. Journal of American Indian Education, 46(3), 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L. (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherokee Nation. (2014). Available at http://www.cherokee.org/Services/Education/ImmersionSchool.aspx. Accessed 8 Sept 2016.

  • Ethnologue. (2016). Available at https://www.ethnologue.com/country/US/languages; https://www.ethnologue.com/about/language-status. Accessed 08 Sept 2016.

  • Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (Ed.). (2001). Can threatened languages be saved? Reversing language shift, revisited: A 21st century perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • FNX (First Nations Experience Television). (2011). Available at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2011/09/27/fnx-native-television-channel-launches-55806. Accessed 19 Aug 2016.

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greymorning, S. (1999). Running the gauntlet of an indigenous language program. In J. Reyhner, G. Cantoni, R. N. St. Clair, & E. P. Yazzie (Eds.), Revitalizing indigenous languages (pp. 6–16). Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (1997). Survival of endangered languages: The California master-apprentice program. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 123, 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (2001a). Language revitalization: An overview. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 3–18). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (2001b). The master-apprentice language learning program. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 217–226). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (2008). Learning and teaching endangered indigenous languages. In N. Hornberger & N. van Deusen-Scholl (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 4. Second and foreign language education (pp. 157–168). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (2010). Language revitalization in North America and the new direction of linguistics. Transforming Anthropology, 18(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L. (2011). Language revitalization and language pedagogy: New teaching and learning strategies. Language and Education, 25(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L., Vera, M., & Steele, N. (2002). How to keep your language alive: A commonsense approach to one-on-one language learning. Berkeley: Heyday Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B., & Johnston, K. (2002). Preschool immersion education for indigenous languages: A survey of resources. A Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26(2), 107. Ethnic News Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickham, E. (2015). Purism, prescriptivism, and privilege: Choctaw language ideologies and their impact on teaching and learning. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, M. (1998). The condition of native North American languages: The need for realistic assessment and action. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 132, 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroskrity, P., & Field, M. C. (2009). Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian country. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (1999). Language and education rights for indigenous peoples. In S. May (Ed.), Indigenous community-based education (pp. 42–66). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2011). Background and motivation of students studying a native American language at the university level. In Working papers in literacy, culture, and language education (Vol. 1, pp. 27–49). Available at http://www.academia.edu/2614804/Background_and_Motivation_of_Students_Studying_a_Native_American_Language. Accessed 19 Aug 2016.

  • NALA (Native American Languages Act). (1990). (NAL, P.L. 101-477, October 30, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSL (National Conference of State Legislatures). Available at http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

  • Oklahoma Historical Society. Available at http://www.okhistory.org/research/aicp. Accessed 16 July 2015.

  • Oklahoma State Department of Education. (2015). Oklahoma Standards for world languages. Available at http://sde.ok.gov/sde/sites/ok.gov.sde/files/2015%20World%20Languages%20Standards.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2016.

  • Oklahoma State Department of Education. http://sde.ok.gov/sde/indian-education. Accessed 10 Feb 2016.

  • Peacock, T., & Day, D. (1999). Teaching American Indian and Alaska native languages in the schools: What has been learned. Eric Digest. ED438155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, L. (2007). “Our beloved Cherokee”: A naturalistic study of Cherokee preschool language immersion. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38(4), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, L., et al. (2003). Assessing the impact of total immersion on Cherokee language revitalization: A culturally responsive, participatory approach. In J. Reyhner, O. V. Trujillo, R. L. Carrasco, & L. Lockard (Eds.), Nurturing native languages (pp. 7–23). Flagstaff: Center for Excellence in Education, Northern Arizona University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, R. (1964). Battlefield and classroom: Four decades with the American Indian, 1867–1904. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyhner, J., & Lockard, L. (Eds.). (2009). Indigenous language revitalization: Encouragement, guidance & lessons learned. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyhner, J. A., & Oyawin Eder, J. M. (2004). American Indian education: A history. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaul, D. L. (2014). Languages and language loss. In Linguistic ideologies of Native American language revitalization (pp. 1–9). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1995). Conditions for language revitalization: A comparison of the cases of Hebrew and Maori. Current Issues in Language and Society, 2(3), 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsunoda, T. (2005). Language endangerment and language revitalization: An introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2010). Native North American Languages spoken at home in the United States and Puerto Rico: 2006–2010. Retrieved on 12 Feb 2016, from http://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/acs/acsbr10-10.html

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2012). The American Indian and Alaska Native Population: 2010. Retrieved 12 Feb 2016, from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-10.pdf

  • UNESCO. Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages. (2003). http://www.unesco.org/languages-atlas/index.php

  • Warhol, L. (2012). Creating official language policy from local practice: The example of the Native American Languages Act 1990/1992. Language Policy, 11, 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurm, S. (1991). Language death and disappearance: Causes and circumstances. Diogenes, 39(153), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, L. T. (2009). Youth, linguistic ecology, and language endangerment: A Yup'ik example. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8(5), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum, Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Emmanuelle S. Chiocca

Authors
  1. Emmanuelle S. Chiocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuelle S. Chiocca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Kentucky Department of Geography, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

    Stanley D Brunn

  2. Deutscher Sprachatlas, Marburg University, Marburg, Hessen, Germany

    Roland Kehrein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chiocca, E.S. (2018). Language Endangerment: Diversity and Specificities of Native American Languages of Oklahoma. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation