Skip to main content

Comments on Various Baseline Series for Patch Testing

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

National baseline series, often based on continental baseline series, usually contain contact allergens to which patients from a particular region are exposed, and that frequently elicit positive and/or relevant patch test reactions. Differences between national baseline series can be explained, among others, by differences in exposure, prescribing habits of physicians, and the (non-)availability of contact allergens. Particularities of baseline series from the following countries are discussed in this chapter: Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK, USA, Australia, Brazil, and Mexico. Furthermore, differences in patch testing may also refer to what vehicle and/or concentration are used to patch-test a given contact allergen. Examples, discussed in this chapter, include metals, hair dyes, rubber components, pharmaceuticals, (meth)acrylates, preservatives, vehicle components, fragrances, and textile dyes. All these considerations should be taken into account when comparing patch test data from different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bruze M, Condé-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR (1999) Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 41(5):241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkinson M, Gonçalo M, Aerts O, Badulici S, Bennike NH, Bruynzeel D, Dickel H, Garcia-Abujeta JL, Giménez-Arnau AM, Hamman C, Isaksson M, Johansen JD, Mahler V, Niklasson B, Orton D, Pigatto P, Ponyai G, Rustemeyer T, Schuttelaar MLA, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Uter W (2019) The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2019. Contact Dermatitis 80(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, Brod B, Warshaw E, Mowad C (2017) American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series: 2017 update. Dermatitis 28(2):141–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veverka KK, Hall MR, Yiannias JA, Drage LA, El-Azhary RA, Killian JM, Johnson JS, Nordberg Linehan DL, Singh N, Davis MDP (2018) Trends in patch testing with the Mayo Clinic standard series, 2011–2015. Dermatitis 29(6):310–315. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000411. PubMed PMID: 30422883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toholka R, Wang YS, Tate B, Tam M, Cahill J, Palmer A, Nixon R (2015) The first Australian baseline series: recommendations for patch testing in suspected contact dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol 56(2):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charles J, Bourrain JL, Tessier A, Lepoittevin JP, Beani JC (2004) Mesalazine and para-phenylenediamine allergy. Contact Dermatitis 51(5–6):313–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu J, Atwater AR, Brod B, Chen JK, Chisolm SS, Cohen DE, de la Feld S, Gaspari AA, Martin KL, Montanez-Wiscovich M, Sheehan M, Silverberg N, Lugo-Somolinos A, Thakur BK, Watsky K, Jacob SE (2018) Pediatric baseline patch test series: pediatric contact dermatitis workgroup. Dermatitis 29(4):206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spiewak R (2014) Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis. Pol J Allergol 1:150–157

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dugonik A, Kalač Pandurovič M, Vok M, Dugonik B (2017) Development and significance of the e-surveillance system for contact allergies in Slovenia. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 25(2):91–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hervella-Garcés M, García-Gavín J, Silvestre-Salvador JF, en representación del Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutánea (GEIDAC) (2016) The Spanish standard patch test series: 2016 update by the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC). Actas Dermosifiliogr 107(7):559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston GA, Exton LS, Mohd Mustapa MF, Slack JA, Coulson IH, English JS, Bourke JF (2017) British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis 2017. Br J Dermatol 176(2):317–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duarte IA, Tanaka GM, Suzuki NM, Lazzarini R, Lopes AS, Volpini BM, Castro PC (2013) Patch test standard series recommended by the Brazilian Contact Dermatitis Study Group during the 2006–2011 period. An Bras Dermatol 88(6):1015–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mortz CG, Jensen E, Madsen JT, Andersen KE (2016) Should carba mix be reintroduced into the European baseline series? Contact Dermatitis 75:48–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M (2016) Patterns of simultaneous patch test reactions to thiurams and dithiocarbamates in 164 patients. Contact Dermatitis 75:353–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stingeni L, Tramontana M, Bianchi L, Foti C, Patruno C, Gallo R et al (2019) Contact sensitivity to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in consecutive patients: a 1-year multicentre SIDAPA study. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13278

  16. Knijp J, Bruynzeel DP, Rustemeyer T (2019) Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and amerchol L101. Contact Dermatitis 80(5):298–303

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The following persons have provided information on their national and/or departmental baseline series and/or their clinical practice of patch testing in their countries: Rosemary Nixon (Australia), Ida Duarte (Brazil), Mette Sommerlund and Jeanne D. Johansen (Denmark), Nadia Raison-Peyron and Evelyne Collet (France), Johannes Geier (Germany), Györgyi Pónyai (Hungary), Luca Stingeni (Italy), Roberto Blancas-Espinosa (Mexico), Erin Warshaw and Mark Denis P. Davis (USA), Radoslaw Spiewak (Poland), Margarida Gonçalo (Portugal), Aleksandra Dugonik (Slovenia), Ana Giménez-Arnau (Spain), Mihály Matura (Sweden), Andreas Bircher (Switzerland), and Natalie Stone (UK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Aerts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aerts, O., Rustemeyer, T., Wilkinson, M. (2020). Comments on Various Baseline Series for Patch Testing. In: Johansen, J., Mahler, V., Lepoittevin, JP., Frosch, P. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_95-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_95-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72451-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Comments on Various Baseline Series for Patch Testing
    Published:
    10 June 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_95-2

  2. Original

    Comments on Various Baseline Series
    Published:
    09 January 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_95-1