Skip to main content

Ecopreneurship for Sustainable Development

The Bricolage Solution

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Engaged Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainability is a critical issue across the globe, and the debate on sustainable development is still in its incipient phase. The purpose of this chapter is to add another perspective in this ongoing debate. Sustainability concerns have led several countries to introduce policy interventions to reduce carbon footprint. However, these policies are not enough to deal with the challenge. The chapter addresses critical sustainability issues through a detailed discussion on key concepts, methods, and lessons learned in operationalizing ecopreneurship as a solution for solving environmental concerns.

Using construction industry as an example, the chapter discusses ecopreneurship as a solution using the twin lenses of sustainability and environmental concerns. Buildings contribute to 24% of the world’s CO2 emissions. A developing country like India with resource constraints which added to the need to reduce the CO2 footprint poses a significant challenge to building architects. This chapter encapsulates case studies of some Indian architects in sustainable innovation and development. Concerned with sustainability in their work, they face challenges and considerable risks. The chapter analyzes the barriers they encounter, how they view these risks, and the methods they adopt to mitigate the risks. The chapter examines in detail the existing definitions and typologies in dealing with sustainability, explores the motivational aspects for ecopreneurs, and researches the various parameters of operationalizing sustainable solutions. The chapter introduces a novel entrepreneur typology – a bricoleur ecopreneur – who uses bricolage as a solution to the challenges of sustainable development.

The chapter can be helpful for researchers in designing research in the overall context of sustainable development debate. Apart from researchers, this would also be useful for international institutions, NGOs, architects, developers, and building users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in – The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2000). The protean entrepreneur: The entrepreneurial process as fitting self and circumstance. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 08, 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association for the Conservation of Energy (ACE). (2004). (http://www.ukace.org/category/ace-research/). Briefing on the energy performance of buildings directive.

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, R., & Guy, S. (2005). The rise of the eco-preneur and the messy world of environmental innovation. Local Environment, 10(6), 665–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T., & McMullen, J. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duymedjian, R., & Rulings, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, D., Eaton, M., Guyer, C., & Stark, T. (2001). An examination of employment change in Northern Ireland’s environmental industry 1993–2003. European Environment II, 11, 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90, Berkeley, Calif.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferneley, E., & Bell, F. (2006). Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs. Technovation, 26(2), 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 420–434). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D. (2009). Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs and the development of a sustainable economy. Greener Management International, 55, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbi, S. E., Anderson, A. R., & Ammar, S. H. (2010). Entrepreneurs and the environment: Towards a typology of Tunisian ecopreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 10(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (2006). The new capitalists: Is it possible to make money and really make a difference? Utne, 135, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (www.iea.org/) IEA. (2008). World energy outlook. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, J., & Muizer, A. (2005). De meest innovatieve sector van Nederland, ranglijst van 58 sectoren. Zoetermeer: EIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1967). The savage mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnanen, L. (2002). An insider’s experiences with environmental entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. D. (2006). Beyond cleaner production: Entrepreneurship and the design of sustainable enterprise. Paper presented to the international conference on green and sustainable innovation, Chiang Mai, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., & Altman, B. W. (1994). Managing the environmental change process: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(4), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randjelovic, J., O’Rourke, A. R., & Orsato, R. J. (2003). The emergence of green venture capital. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(4), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Blackburn, R. (2007). The business case for sustainability? An examination of small firms in the UK’s construction and restaurant sectors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 2002(38), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlange, L. E. (2006). What drives sustainable entrepreneurs? Paper presented at applied business and entrepreneurship association international conference, Kona, pp. 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlange, L. E. (2009). Stakeholder identification in sustainability entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 55, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. & S. Venkataraman (2000). "The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25, 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship – Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2000). Small firm environmental ethics: How deep do they go? Business Ethics: a European Review, 9(I), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2007). Conceptualising sustainability entrepreneurship. Paper presented to the first world symposium on sustainable entrepreneurship, University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F., & Parrish, B. D. (2006). From poles to wholes: Facilitating an integrated approach to sustainable entrepreneurship. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2(4), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program – Sustainable Buildings & Climate Initiative (UNEP-SBCI). (2009). Buildings and climate change summary for decision makers. www.unep.org/sbci/pdfs/sbci-bccsummary.pdf.

  • Walley, E. E., & Taylor, D. W. (2002). Opportunists, champions, mavericks…? Greener Management International, 38, 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organisations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R., Webb, M., & Wilsdon, J. (2007). The disrupters: Lessons for low-carbon innovation from the new wave of environmental pioneers. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., et al. (2017). Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 70, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, J. G., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parag Rastogi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rastogi, P., Sharma, R. (2018). Ecopreneurship for Sustainable Development. In: Marques, J. (eds) Handbook of Engaged Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71312-0_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics