Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-stakeholder Partnerships in Public Policy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Partnerships for the Goals

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson MR (2003) Access to justice and legal process: making legal institutions responsive to poor people in LDCs. IDS working paper no 178. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan Assoc 35(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K (2006) Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Eur Environ 16(5):290–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman A (2017) The rise of multistakeholder partnerships. Proc ASIL Annu Meet 111:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/amp.2017.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biekart K, Fowler A (2018) Ownership dynamics in local multi-stakeholder initiatives. Third World Q 39(9):1692–1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1450139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouldin CE (2010) NGOs and political participation in weak democracies: sub-national evidence on poorest and voter turnout from Bolivia. J Polit 72(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990922. Cambridge University Press

  • Brown D (2008, April) Multi-stakeholder processes: lessons for the process of timber verification. Briefing paper. Overseas Development Institute, pp 1–5. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/4480.pdf

  • Burger D, Mayer C (2003) Making Sustainable Development a Reality: The Role of Social and Ecological standards. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zuzammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • CIVICUS (2000) Project proposal: the CIVICUS index on civil society. World Alliance for Citizen Participation. Retrieved from www.civicus.org

  • Clarke A, MacDonald A (2019) Outcomes to partners in multi-stakeholder cross-sector partnerships: a resource-based view. Bus Soc 58(2):298–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dev RD (2012, May 2) Democratic functions of media. FES Nepal Office. Retrieved from http://www.telegraphnepal.com/views/2012-05-02/nepal:-democratic-functions-of-media.html

  • Engberg-Pedersen P (2014) Multi-stakeholder partnerships in Danish development policy: poverty reduction, sustainable development and global public goods. DIIS report, no 2014:27. Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen. ISBN 978-87-7605-723-7

    Google Scholar 

  • German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) (2017) Multi-stakeholder partnerships in the context of Agenda 2030. Partnerships 2030, Bonn, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Habitat UN, UNEP (1999) Institutionalising environmental planning and management process, sustainable cities programme. UN Habitat and UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlewood P (2015) Global multi-stakeholder partnerships: scaling up public-private collective impact for the SDGs. Background paper 4. World Resources Institute/Independent Research Forum. Retrieved from https://www.irforum.org/sites/default/files/publications/Retreat%20%236_BP%204_Final%20for%20website.pdf

  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2012) Collaboration and multi-stakeholder dialogue, a review of the literature. Forest Conservation Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Version 1.1, p 18. Retrieved from http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/collaboration_and_multi_stakeholder_dialogue.pdf

  • Malena C (2004) Challenges and best practices in the management and governance of multi-stakeholder partnerships involving UN and Civil Society Actors. Background paper prepared by Carmen Malena for the Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on Partnerships and UN-Civil Society Relations Pocantico, New York, February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Menashy F (2017) The limits of multistakeholder governance: the case of the global partnership for education and private schooling. Comp Educ Rev 61(2):240–268. https://doi.org/10.1086/690839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multipart (2010) Theoretical & methodological framework and guidance for the project, multi-stakeholder partnerships in post-conflict reconstruction: the role of EU. Final report of work packages 2 and 3, the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy V, Pierre H (2004, May) Governance and multistakeholder processes. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Manitoba, This paper is a product of the Sustainable Commodity Initiative, a joint venture of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and IISD © 2004 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, the International Institute for Sustainable Development and the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicole H, Olga M (2011, Jan 16) The multi-stakeholder approach in the United Nations: unprecedented perhaps, but not unexpected. Paper to be presented at “Transnational private regulation in the areas of health, environment, social and labor rights” DRAFT. Retrieved from https://www.wup.wi.tum.de/fileadmin/w00beh/www/Files/Boehling_TransReg_2011.pdf

  • Paine P, McCann R (2009, September) Engaging stakeholders including parents and the community to sustain improved reading outcomes. Sustainability series no 6, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche A (2012) Global policies and local practice: loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Bus Ethics Q 22(4):679–708. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte JA (2001) Civil society and democracy in global governance. Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization (CSGR), University of Warwick, Coventry

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky J, Parker B (2010) Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. J Bus Ethics 94:21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan F (2009) The European Union as a partner in promoting democracy in Bangladesh. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, International IDEA, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind LE, Fuller BW, Ferenz M, Fairman D (2003) Multistakeholder dialogue at the global scale. Int Negot 8(2):235–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180603322576121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and Foundation for Development Cooperation (FDC) (2003) Multi-stakeholder partnerships, issue paper. Global Knowledge Partnership Secretariat, Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell S, Waddock S, Cornell S, Dentoni D, McLachlan M, Meszoely G (2015) Large systems change: an emerging field of transformation and transitions. J Corp Citizsh 58:5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S, Meszoely GM, Waddell S, Dentoni D (2015) The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. J Organ Chang Manag 28(6):993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2014-0146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014, September) Increasing the effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives through active collaboration. The World Bank Conference (WP 1314) was held on 2014, April 28–30 in Washington, organized by Wilton Park in partnership with the World Bank and Reos Partners, and with the support of the Transparency and Accountability Initiative and the Hewlett Foundation Retrieved from https://www.wiltonpark.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/WP1314-Report1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Administration, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

    Md Nurul Momen

Authors
  1. Md Nurul Momen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Nurul Momen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European School of Sustainability, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. Center for Neuroscience & Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Anabela Marisa Azul

  3. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo, Brazil

    Luciana Brandli

  4. HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Amanda Lange Salvia

  5. International Centre for Thriving, University of Chester, Chester, UK

    Tony Wall

Section Editor information

  1. Divinity School, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

    Elena Shabliy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Momen, M.N. (2020). Multi-stakeholder Partnerships in Public Policy. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Partnerships for the Goals. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_50-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_50-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71067-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation