Partnerships for the Goals

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Reimagining Development Institutions for the SDG Era: Pathways to Impact

  • Robyn EversoleEmail author
  • Nicolás Gambetta
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71067-9_48-1

Definitions

Development institutions – The structures and processes through which initiatives to achieve positive change are designed, implemented, and negotiated. Development institutions guide the nature and practices of development organizations.

Impact pathways – The processes through which an impact or significant positive outcome is achieved. Impact pathways may be conceptualized according to one or more theories of change, in which actions create outputs, outcomes, and ultimately impacts.

Introduction: Old Institutions, New Challenges

Development studies is finally overcoming the constraints of its postcolonial framing. Its vertical division of the world into categories of “developed” or “underdeveloped,” North or South, is shifting to explore the potential for horizontal relationships for change (IDS 2017). In practice the playing field for development action has widened, and the definition of “development” has deepened. With the Sustainable Development Goals (UN 2015), social...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2018) Australian Demographic Statistics, Mar 2018. Catalogue Number 3101.0Google Scholar
  2. Austrade (Australian Trade and Investment Commission) (2017) ‘Australia’s export performance in FY2017’ 22 December. Available online at: https://www.austrade.gov.au/news/economic-analysis/australias-export-performance-in-fy2017. Viewed November 2018
  3. Australian Government (2018) Report on the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, BartonGoogle Scholar
  4. Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (2012) Summary document. Organisation for economic cooperation and development (July). Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Busan%20partnership.pdf. Viewed October 2018
  5. CESV (Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability Victoria) (2018) Applying the SDGs – determining socio-economic indicators for Victoria’s environment. 28 February. Available online at: https://www.ces.vic.gov.au/articles/applying-sdgs-determining-socio-economic-indicators-victorias-environment. Viewed October 2018
  6. CFI (Collaboration for Impact) (n.d.) Collaboration for impact – about us. Available online at https://www.collaborationforimpact.com/about-us/. Viewed October 2018
  7. City of Melbourne (2017) Opportunities and recommendations report 2017, Annual Plan Initiative 1.13 (‘Complete a desktop assessment of how City of Melbourne’s strategies and plans deliver against the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals [SDGs])’. Melbourne: City of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  8. Commonwealth of Australia (2017) Transitioning regional economies. Report. Australian Government Productivity Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. Crewe E, Axelby R (2012) Anthropology and development: culture, morality and politics in a globalized world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crewe E, Harrison E (1998) Whose development? An ethnography of aid. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. DFAT (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) (2018) Uruguay country brief. Available online at https://dfat.gov.au/geo/uruguay/Pages/uruguay-country-brief.aspx. Viewed October 2018
  12. Eversole R (2011) Community agency and community engagement: re-theorising participation in governance. J Publ Policy 31(1):51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eversole R (2015) Knowledge partnering for community development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Eversole R (2016) Regional development in Australia: being regional. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Eversole R (2018) Anthropology for development, from theory to practice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Eyben R (2014) International aid and the making of a better world: reflexive practice. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eyben R, Savage L (2012) Emerging and submerging powers: imagined geographies in the new development partnership at the Busan fourth high level forum sustainable development solutions network. J Dev Stud 49(4):457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GCNA (Global Compact Network Australia) (2018) Sustainable Development Goals Case Study Hub. Available online at https://sdgs.org.au/. Viewed October 2018
  19. Geoscience Australia (n.d.) Area of Australia – states and territories. Available online at http://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/national-location-information/dimensions/area-of-australia-states-and-territories. Viewed October 2018
  20. House Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation (2018) Regions at the ready: investing in Australia’s future – final report. House of Representatives Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation, Parliament of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  21. IDS (Institute of Development Studies) (2017) Has universal development come of age? IDS Bull 28(1A)Google Scholar
  22. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas) (2017) Anuario Estadístico 2017. MontevideoGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelly L, Roche C (2014) Partnerships for effective development. Australian Council for International Development (ACFID). Deakin, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehman J (n.d.) A brief explanation of the Overton window, Mackinac Centre for Public Policy, Published online at https://www.mackinac.org/overtonwindow. Viewed October 2018
  25. National Sustainable Development Council (2018) SDG Transforming Australia Project. Available online at: https://www.sdgtransformingaustralia.com/. Viewed October 2018
  26. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parliament of Australia (2017) Inquiry into the United Nations sustainable development goals (SDG). Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee, Department of the Senate, Canberra. Available online at https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Foreign_Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/SDGs. Viewed October 2018Google Scholar
  28. Pike A, Rodriguez-Pose A, Tomaney J (2006) Local and regional development. Taylor and Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Presidencia de la República Oriental del Uruguay (2018) Informe Nacional Voluntario Uruguay 2018Google Scholar
  30. Rahnema M, Bawtree V (1997) The post-development reader. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. SDSN (2018) SDG Index and dashboard report 2018: global responsibilities, implementing the goals. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development, July 2018Google Scholar
  32. SSA (State Services Authority) (2007) Victorian approaches to joined up government: an overview. Report. Victorian Government, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  33. Storper M (1997) The regional world. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Storper M (2005) Society, community, and economic development. Stud Comp Int Dev 39(4):30–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Uruguay XXI (2017) Investment opportunities: tourism, renewable energies. Uruguay XXI, MontevideoGoogle Scholar
  37. Vázquez Barquero A (2007) Desarrollo Endógeno: Teorías y Políticas de Desarrollo Territorial. Investig Regionales 11(autumn):183–210Google Scholar
  38. World Bank (2016) The worldwide governance indicators. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne UniversityHawthornAustralia
  2. 2.Universidad ORT UruguayMontevideoUruguay

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Tortora
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Management SciencesUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.PIN Prato. University of FlorenceLaboratorio Ambiente, Impresa, SocietàPratoItaly