Synonyms
Definitions
People and community engagement is a process through which affected sides influence and share control over development initiatives and the decisions and resources which affect them (Santiso 2001).
Public participation encompasses a group of procedures designed to consult, involve, and inform the public to allow those affected by a decision to have an input into that decision (Smith 2003).
Introduction
People and community engagement envisages the participation of all relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process with an interest in outcomes, bringing together the key actors and supporting and challenging all wider public to be actively engaged. Participation or engagement is the “power to influence the decision-making process.” Public participation and community engagement has rooted over hierarchical public policy practitioner – client relation that dominated the positivistic policy sciences and practice – and is a viable, if not...
References
Abelson J, Gauvin FP (2006) Assessing the impacts of public participation: concepts, evidence and policy implications: research report P|06, Public involvement network, p 4. Canadian Policy Research Network
Abelson J et al (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 57:239–251
Armeni C (2016) Participation in environmental decision-making: reflecting on planning and community benefits for major wind farms. J Environ Law 28(3):415–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw021
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan. Association, 35(4):216–224
Beierle TC (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Rev Policy Res 16(3–4):75–103
Brabham DC (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. 8(3):242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824. http://plt.sagepub.com. Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. 8(3): 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824; http://plt.sagepub.com
Brodie E, Cowling E, Nissen N (2009) Understanding participation: a literature review [Online] National Council for Voluntary Organisations. Available from: http://www.ivr.org.uk/images/stories/Institute-of-Volunteering-Research/Migrated-Resources/Documents/U/Pathways-literature-review-final-version.pdf
Bryson JM (2004) What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review 6(1):21–53
Cohen J (1989) Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy. In: Hamlin A, Pettit P (eds) The good polity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 17–34
Community Tool Box (2018) Section 8. Identifying and analyzing stakeholders and their interests. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/participation/encouraging-involvement/identify-stakeholders/main
Cooper TL, Bryer TA, Meek JW (2006) Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Special Issue Public Adm Rev 66:76–88
Davies A (2001) What silence knows- planning, public participation and environmental values. Environ Values 10(1):77–102
Dryzek J (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-956294-6
(Ec.europa.eu./2017). Aarhus convention – environment – European Commission. [online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/
(ECE/MP.EIA/21/Amend.1/2017) Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention)
(ECE/MP.PP/2014/8) Maastricht Recommendations on Promoting Effective Public Participation in Decision-making in Environmental Matters
Elster J (ed) (1998) Deliberative democracy (Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-59696-3
Few R et al (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Pol 7(1):46–59
Fiorino DJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 15(2):226–243
Fischer F (1993) Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sci 26(3):165–187
Foucault M (2002) The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. Routlege, London and New York
Habermas J (1975) Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press, Boston – Political Science – 166 pages.
Innes EJ (2007) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plan Assoc 62(4):460–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975712
Innes JE, Booher DE (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice 5(4):419–436
International Association of Public Participation – IAPP (2004) Public participation spectrum. http://www.iap2.org.au/sitebuilder/resources/knowledge/asset/files/36/iap2spectrum.pdf
Irvin AR, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm Rev 64(1):55–65
Keogh B (1990) Public participation in community tourism planning. Ann Tour Res 17:449–465
Lovrić N (2015) Stakeholder Participation in the Creation of Spatial Plan for Nature Park Medvednica, Uni Freiburg, https://doi.org/10.6094/UNIFR/10240
Lovrić N, Lovrić M (2018) Network approach to constructing theory of participation in spatial planning. Land Use Policy 79:30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.038
Lovrić N, Lovrić M, Konold W (2018) A grounded theory approach for deconstructing the role of participation in spatial planning: insights from Nature Park Medvednica, Croatia. Forest Policy Econ 87:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.003
Macnaghten P, Jacobs M (1997) Public identification with sustainable development. Glob Environ Chang 7(1):5–24
OECD (2005) Evaluating public participation in policy making. OECD Publishing, Paris
Petts J, Leach B (2000) Evaluating methods for public participation: literature review. ENTEC, R&D technical report E135. Environment Agency Rio House.
Quetzal Tritter J, McCallum A (2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76(2):156
Renn O et al (1993) Public participation in decision making: a tree-step procedure. Policy Sci 26:189–214
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(3):3–29
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2004) Evaluating public- participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci Technol Hum Values 29(4):512–556
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30:251
Rydin Y, Pennington M (2000) Public Participation and local environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environ 5(2):153–169
Santiso C (2001) World Bank and good governance: good governance and aid effectiveness: the World Bank and conditionality. The Georgetown Public Policy Review. 7(1):1–22
Smith G (2003) Deliberative democracy and the environment (Environmental politics). Routledge. ISBN 0-415-30940-9
Stoll-kleemann S, O’Riordan T (2002) From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: experience from Germany and South Africa. Soc Nat Resour 15:161–177
Thompson DF (2008) Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Rev Polit Sci 11:497–520. ISBN 978-0824333119
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on access to information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, June, 1998
Wiedemann PM, Femers S (1993) Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management of conflicts. J Hazard Mater 33:355–368
Wilcox D (1994–2003) Guide to effective participation. Delta Press, Brighton. 73p
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lovrić, N. (2019). People and Community Engagement in Biodiversity Conservation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Life on Land. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_94-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_94-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences