Life on Land

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Tony Wall

Forest Carbon Stock and Fluxes: Distribution, Biogeochemical Cycles, and Measurement Techniques

  • Sharif A. MukulEmail author
  • Md. Abdul Halim
  • John Herbohn
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_23-1

Definitions

Forest carbon stock

It is the amount of carbon sequestered from the atmosphere and stored in a forest ecosystem, mainly within living biomass and soil and, to a lesser extent, in deadwood and litter.

Forest carbon flux

It is the transfer of carbon (mass) to and from the per-unit forest area per unit time. Carbon efflux is the transfer of carbon out of the forest to another pool, and the influx is the transfer of carbon from other pools to the forest.

Forest carbon cycle

It is the constant movement of carbon between the atmosphere and forests. The biological part of this cycle involves carbon sequestration by plants from the atmosphere via photosynthesis and loss of carbon through respiration and decay.

Forest carbon balance

It is a dynamic process that can be calculated as the total carbon uptake by a forest minus the net carbon loss from the forest. The forest carbon balance is highly dependent on disturbances and environmental constraints.

Biomass

It is the mass of living...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Wang MMH, Mcgarvey JC, Lebauer DS (2016) Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC-db). Glob Chang Biol 22: 1690–1709Google Scholar
  2. Ashton MS, Tyrrell ML, Spalding D, Gentry B (eds) (2012) Managing forest carbon in a changing climate. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Baccini A, Walker W, Carvalho L, Farina M, Sulla-Menashe D, Houghton RA (2017) Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358:230–234Google Scholar
  4. Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (2018) The biomass distribution on Earth. PNAS 115:6506–6511Google Scholar
  5. Battin TJ, Luyssaert S, Kaplan LA, Aufdenkampe AK, Richter A, Tranvik LJ (2009) The boundless carbon cycle. Nat Geosci 2:598–600Google Scholar
  6. Beer C et al (2010) Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329:834–838Google Scholar
  7. Bello C et al (2015) Defaunation affects carbon storage in tropical forests. Sci Adv 1:e1501105Google Scholar
  8. Blunden J, Arndt DS (eds) (2019) State of the climate in 2018. Bull Am Meteorol Soci 100:Si–S305Google Scholar
  9. Bosveld FC, Beljaars ACM (2001) The impact of sampling rate on eddy-covariance flux estimates. Agric For Meteorol 109:39–45Google Scholar
  10. Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper 134. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Busch J, Engelmann J, Cook-Patton SC, Griscom BW, Kroeger T, Possingham H, Shyamsundar P (2019) Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nat Clim Chang 9:463–466Google Scholar
  12. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11Google Scholar
  13. Chao S (2012) Forest peoples: numbers across the world. Forest Peoples ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  14. Chave J et al (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99Google Scholar
  15. Chave J et al (2014) Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Chang Biol 20:3177–3190Google Scholar
  16. Chave J et al (2019) Ground data are essential for biomass remote sensing missions. Surv Geophys 40:863–880Google Scholar
  17. Chazdon RL (2014) Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR (2016) Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48:716–730Google Scholar
  19. Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC (2018) Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361:1108–1111Google Scholar
  20. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293Google Scholar
  21. Dong JR, Kaufmann RK, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ, Kauppi PE, Liski J, Buermann W, Alexeyev V, Hughes MK (2003) Remote sensing estimates of boreal and temperate forest woody biomass: carbon pools, sources, and sinks. Remote Sens Environ 84:393–410Google Scholar
  22. Drake JB, Knox RG, Dubayah RO, Clark DB, Condit R, Blair JB, Hofton M (2003) Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy neotropical forests using LiDAR remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:147–159Google Scholar
  23. Edwards DP, Fisher B, Boyd E (2010) Protecting degraded rainforests: enhancement of forest carbon stocks under REDD+. Conserv Lett 3:313–316Google Scholar
  24. Emanuel WR, Shugart HH, Stevenson M (1985) Climatic change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes. Climate Change 7:29–43Google Scholar
  25. Espırito-Santo FDB et al (2014) Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance. Nat Commun 5:3434Google Scholar
  26. Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci L (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322Google Scholar
  27. FAO (2016a) Global forest resources assessment 2015: how are the world’s forests changing? Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. FAO (2016b) Forestry for a low-carbon future- integrating forests and wood products in climate change strategies. FAO forestry paper 177. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  29. Foley JA et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574Google Scholar
  30. Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2:045023Google Scholar
  31. Hairiah K, Dewi S, Agus F, Velarde S, Ekadinata A, Rahayu S, van Noordwijk M (2011) Measuring carbon stocks across land use systems: a manual. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), BogorGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen MC et al (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850–853Google Scholar
  33. Houghton RA (2013) The emissions of carbon from deforestation and degradation in the tropics: past trends and future potential. Carbon Manage 4:539–546Google Scholar
  34. Hughes RF, Asner GP, Baldwin JA, Mascaro J, Bufil LKK, Knapp DE (2018) Estimating aboveground carbon density across forest landscapes of Hawaii: combining FIA plot-derived estimates and airborne LiDAR. For Ecol Manag 424:323–337Google Scholar
  35. Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimation for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35Google Scholar
  36. Kayler Z, Janowiak M, Swanston C (2017) Global carbon. Climate Change Resource Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Keith R, Mackey BG, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world’s most carbon-dense forests. PNAS 106:11635–11640Google Scholar
  38. Köchy M, Hiederer R, Freibauer A (2015) Global distribution of soil organic carbon–Part 1: Masses and frequency distributions of SOC stocks for the tropics, permafrost regions, wetlands, and the world. Soil 1:351–365Google Scholar
  39. Kondo M et al (2018) Plant regrowth as a driver of recent enhancement of terrestrial CO2 uptake. Geophys Res Lett 45:4820–4830Google Scholar
  40. Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220:242–258Google Scholar
  41. Landell-Mills N, Porras IT (2002) Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Laporte N, Justice C, Kendall J (1995) Mapping the dense humid forest of Cameroon and Zaire using AVHRR satellite data. Int J Remote Sens 16:1127–1145Google Scholar
  43. Levesque J, King DJ (2003) Spatial analysis of radiometric fractions from high-resolution multispectral imagery for modelling individual tree crown and forest canopy structure and health. Remote Sens Environ 84:589–609Google Scholar
  44. Lewis SL, Phillips OL, Baker TR (2006) Impacts of global atmospheric change on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 21:173–174Google Scholar
  45. Lewis SL, Edwards DP, Galbraith D (2015) Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349:827–832Google Scholar
  46. Lo YH, Blanco JA, González de Andrés E, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ (2019) CO2 fertilization plays a minor role in long-term carbon accumulation patterns in temperate pine forests in the southwestern Pyrenees. Ecol Model 407:108737Google Scholar
  47. Lu D (2006) The potential and challenge of remote sensing-based biomass estimation. Int J Remote Sens 27:1297–1328Google Scholar
  48. Lu D, Batistella M (2005) Exploring TM image texture and its relationships with biomass estimation in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amazon 35:249–257Google Scholar
  49. Malhi Y, Grace J (2000) Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trends Ecol Evol 15:332–337Google Scholar
  50. Martin AR, Thomas SC (2011) A reassessment of carbon content in tropical trees. PLoS One 6:e23533Google Scholar
  51. Mitchard ETA (2018) The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559:527–534Google Scholar
  52. Mukul SA (2016) Shifting cultivation in the upland secondary forests of the Philippines: biodiversity and carbon stock assessment, and ecosystem services trade-offs in land-use decisions. PhD thesis, The University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  53. Mukul SA, Herbohn J (2016) The impacts of shifting cultivation on secondary forests dynamics in tropics: a synthesis of the key findings and spatio temporal distribution of research. Environ Sci Pol 55:167–177Google Scholar
  54. Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J (2016a) Tropical secondary forests regenerating after shifting cultivation in the Philippines uplands are important carbon sinks. Sci Rep 6:22483Google Scholar
  55. Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J (2016b) Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from secondary forests in the Philippine uplands: implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48:882–889Google Scholar
  56. Mukul SA, Huq S, Herbohn J, Nishat A, Rahman AA, Amin R, Ahmed FU (2019a) Rohingya refugees and the environment. Science 364:138Google Scholar
  57. Mukul SA et al (2019b) Combined effects of climate change and sea-level rise project dramatic habitat loss of the globally endangered Bengal tiger in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Sci Total Environ 663:830–840Google Scholar
  58. Muukkonen P, Heiskanen J (2007) Biomass estimation over a large area based on stand wise forest inventory data and ASTER and MODIS satellite data: a possibility to verify carbon inventories. Remote Sens Environ 107:617–624Google Scholar
  59. Pan Y et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993Google Scholar
  60. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB (2013) The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:593–622Google Scholar
  61. Parrotta JA, Wildburger C, Mansourian S (eds) (2012) Understanding relationships between biodiversity, carbon, forests and people: the key to achieving REDD+ objectives. A global assessment report. IUFRO world series, vol 31. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), ViennaGoogle Scholar
  62. Petrokofsky G, Holmgren P, Brown ND (2011) Reliable forest carbon monitoring –systematic reviews as a tool for validating the knowledge base. Int For Rev 13: 56–66Google Scholar
  63. Phillips OL et al (1998) Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots. Science 282:439–442Google Scholar
  64. Prentice IC et al (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 183–237Google Scholar
  65. Price DT et al (2013) Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems. Environ Rev 21:322–365Google Scholar
  66. Pugh TAM et al (2019) Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. PNAS 116:4382–4387Google Scholar
  67. Qie L et al (2017) Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects. Nat Commun 8:1966Google Scholar
  68. Roxburgh SH, Paul KI, Clifford D, England JR, Raison RJ (2015) Guidelines for constructing allometric models for the prediction of woody biomass: how many individuals to harvest? Ecosphere 6:38Google Scholar
  69. Saatchi SS et al (2013) Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. PNAS 108:9899–9904Google Scholar
  70. Saner P, Loh YY, Ong RC, Hector A (2012) Carbon stocks and fluxes in tropical lowland dipterocarp rainforests in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. PLoS One 7:e29642Google Scholar
  71. Scharlemann JPW, Tanner EVJ, Hiederer R, Kapos V (2014) Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Manage 5:81–91Google Scholar
  72. Scheffera M, Hirotaa M, Holmgren M, Nes EHV, Chapin FS III (2012) Thresholds for boreal biome transitions. PNAS 102:21384–21389Google Scholar
  73. Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J, Birdsey R, Cieszewski C (1997) Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. For Sci 43:424–434Google Scholar
  74. Schulze ED, Wirth C, Heimann M (2000) Managing forests after Kyoto. Science 289:2058–2059Google Scholar
  75. Schulze ED, Beck E, Buchmann N, Clemens S, Müller-Hohenstein K, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2019) Plant ecology, 2nd edn. Springer Nature, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Steidinger BS et al (2019) Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest tree symbioses. Nature 569:404–408Google Scholar
  77. Stephenson NL, van Mantgem PJ (2005) Forest turnover rates follow global and regional patterns of productivity. Ecol Lett 8:524–531Google Scholar
  78. Sullivan MJP et al (2016) Diversity and carbon storage across the tropical forest biome. Sci Rep 7:39102Google Scholar
  79. Sun G, Ranson KJ, Kharuk VI (2002) Radiometric slope correction for forest biomass estimation from SAR data in the Western Sayani Mountains, Siberia. Remote Sens Environ 79:279–287Google Scholar
  80. Thomas SC, Halim MA, Gale NV, Sujeeun L (2019) Biochar enhancement of facilitation effects in agroforestry: early growth and physiological responses in a maize-leucaena model system. Agrofor Syst 93: 2213–2225Google Scholar
  81. van der Werf GR et al (2009) CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nat Geosci 2:737–738Google Scholar
  82. Wang S, Chen JM, Ju WM, Feng X, Chen M, Chen P, Yu G (2007) Carbon sinks and sources in China’s forests during 1901–2001. J Environ Manag 85: 524–537Google Scholar
  83. Woodbury PB, Smith JE, Heath LS (2007) Carbon sequestration in the US forest sector from 1990 to 2010. For Ecol Manag 241:14–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharif A. Mukul
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Md. Abdul Halim
    • 4
    • 5
  • John Herbohn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydoreAustralia
  2. 2.Tropical Forestry GroupThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Research on Land-use SustainabilityDhakaBangladesh
  4. 4.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of Forestry and Environmental ScienceShahjalal University of Science and TechnologySylhetBangladesh

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ana Catarina Luz
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)LisbonPortugal