Skip to main content

Addressing Inequality through an Integral Design Approach for Sustainable Development in Rural Communities

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Reduced Inequalities

Definition

United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) defines the development that meets the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs as sustainable development (WCED 1987).

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) classifies the areas with a population density below 150 inhabitants per km2 as rural (European Commission 2017).

Introduction

Since Rousseau’s enlightenment period article discours sur l’origine de l’inégalité parmi les hommes (Rousseau 1772), changes to rural life have been recognized as at the root of social inequality. Rousseau saw the basis of inequality in the demand from agriculturists for territorial delineation, as this social hierarchy was reinforced by the right of property as well as by the traditional master/servant distinction. In post-industrial societies, while social inequalities in the urban centers were still substantial, they were countered with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Lehrer D, Huizenga C (2006) Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2002) Inequality, environment, and planning. Environ Plan A 34:1716–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Winkels A (2007) 12 vulnerability, poverty and sustaining Well-being handbook of sustainable development: 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. MIT Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang S (2017) Intercultural dialogue through design (iDiDe): a model of intercultural collaboration and student engagement. IGI Global

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson G, Dietz S, Neumayer E, Agarwala M (2014) Handbook of sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Azman M, Ahamad M, Hussin W (2012) Comparative study on prefabrication construction process. Int Surv Res J 2:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett E, Howard N (2000) Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building. Build Res Inf 28:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell B, Wakeford K (2008) Expanding architecture: design as activism. Metropolis Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva GI, Ermoshkina EN, Kosyakova IV, Pankratova LE, Zotova AS (2016) Strategic analysis of sustainable socioeconomic situation of rural areas in the Samara Region of the Russian Federation. Int J Environ Sci Educ 11:6889–6897

    Google Scholar 

  • Bon R, Hutchinson K (2000) Sustainable construction: some economic challenges. Build Res Inf 28:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland G (1987) Our common future: report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development, vol 1. United Nations, Oslo, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LW, Foster SR (2001) From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly H (1993) Sustainable growth: an impossibility theorem. In: Daly H, Townsend K (eds) Valuing the earth: economics, ecology ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • de Carvalho ACV, Granja AD, da Silva VG (2017) A systematic literature review on integrative lean and sustainability synergies over a building’s lifecycle. Sustainability 9:1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKay M, Bennett S (2011) Integral sustainable design: a transformative perspective. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKay M, Guzowski M (2006) A model for integral sustainable design explored through daylighting. In: ASES conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuble MP, de Dear RJ (2012) Green occupants for green buildings: the missing link? Build Environ 56:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (2003) Social justice and environmental sustainability: ne’er the twain shall meet just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. 83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • DSEWPC (2012) DSEWPC annual report 2011–12. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis C (2002) Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries CSIR report BOU E 204

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis C (2007) A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries. Constr Manag Econ 25:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600601313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbjörn-Hargens S (2010) An integral overview of climate change. J Integral Theory Pract 5

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Rural-Urban Typology. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Urban-rural_typology

  • Feige A, Wallbaum H, Janser M, Windlinger L (2013) Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant's comfort and productivity. J Corporate Real Estate 15:7–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MS (1999) The fate of sustainable development under neo-liberal regimes in developing countries. Int Polit Sci Rev 20:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D (2014) Sustainable development: our common future revisited. Glob Environ Chang 26:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iagaru R, Pompilica I (2014) The impact of the current situation on the development of non-agricultural activities in rural areas situated at the border of Sibiu agricultural management/Lucrari Stiintifice Seria I. Manag Agricol 16:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon L, Poon C-S (2008) Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study. Constr Manag Econ 26:953–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibert CJ, Sendzimir J, Guy B (2000) Construction ecology and metabolism: natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment. Constr Manag Econ 18:903–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900446867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaman A, Bordass B (2007) Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? Build Res Inf 35:662–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell G, May A, McDonald A (1995) PICABUE: a methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecology 2:104–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyatake Y (1996) Technology development and sustainable construction. J Manag Eng 12:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nations U (2009) Decisions by topic: rural development a/RES/70/1 – transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/ruraldevelopment/decisions. Accessed 8 Dec 2017

  • Nations U (2016) Sustainable development goals. United Nations Development Program. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html. Accessed 29 June 2018

  • Nistreanu M, Mărăcineanu F, Constantin E (2009) Sustainable regional development. Policies and Strategies. Editura Nouă, BucureÅŸti

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr DW (2006) Design on the edge: the making of a high-performance building. Mit Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul WL, Taylor PA (2008) A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Build Environ, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.006

  • Pearce D, Markandya A, Barbier E (2013) Blueprint 1: for a green economy. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter G (1991) Global environmental politics. Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts P (1995) Environmentally sustainable business: a local and regional perspective. SAGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D (2003) Sustainability and equity: reflections of a local government practitioner in southern Africa just Sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp 187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetzel A, Fuller R, Rajagopalan P (2016) Visual mapping of the Integral Sustainable Design approach. In: ANZAScA 2016: Fifty years later: revisiting the role of architectural science in design and practice. School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetzel A, Fuller R, Rajagopalan P (2017) Integral sustainable design – reflections on the theory and practice from a case study. Sustain Cities Soc 28:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1772). Discours sur l'origine et les fondemens de l'inégalité parmi les hommes (Vol. 1): chez Marc Michel Rey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design Co-design 4:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepers F (2017) An integral design framework – designing a global village. Des J 20:S1566–S1579

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR, Taylor JR (2000) Achieving sustainability: exploring links between sustainability indicators and public involvement for rural communities. Landsc J 19:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DE (2000) The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. Am Behav Sci 43:508–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippett J, Handley JF, Ravetz J (2007) Meeting the challenges of sustainable development-A conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning 0305-9006 67:1–98

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED UNCoEaD (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED UWCoEaD (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future (the Brundtland report). United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White RM, van Koten H (2016) Co-designing for sustainability: strategizing community carbon emission reduction through socio-ecological innovation. The Design Journal 19:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber K (2001) The eye of spirit: an integral vision for a world gone slightly mad. 3rd ed., expanded edn. Shambhala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayani Karunasena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Karunasena, G., Tucker, R., Ang, S. (2021). Addressing Inequality through an Integral Design Approach for Sustainable Development in Rural Communities. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (eds) Reduced Inequalities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_36-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71060-0_36-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71060-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71060-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics