Synonyms
Definitions
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a novel approach to the governance of science, research, and innovation (R&I) that seeks to broaden decision-making processes to realize ethically acceptable, societally desirable, and sustainable R&I. Although the concept is still debated, the following shared characteristics of RRI have been distinguished:
- 1.
Diversity and inclusion
- 2.
Anticipation and reflection
- 3.
Openness and transparency
- 4.
Responsiveness and adaptive change
- 5.
Ethics
- 6.
Social utility
Governance of Science, Research, and Innovation
Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a novel approach to the governance of science, research, and innovation (for the sake of brevity abbreviated to R&I from now on) (Fisher and Rip 2013; Stilgoe et al. 2013). Governance can be understood as a complex multitude of language, agencies, and technologies that seek to shape individual and collective behavior (Glerup and Horst 2014). Nested in...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Blok V, Lemmens P (2015) The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In: Koops B-J et al (eds) Responsible innovation 2. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 19–35
Burget M et al (2017) Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci Eng Ethics 23(1):1–19
Davis M, Laas K (2014) “Broader impacts” or “Responsible research and innovation”? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering. Sci Eng Ethics 20(4):963–983
de Hoop E et al (2016) Limits to responsible innovation. J Responsible Innov 3(2):1–25
European Commission (2011) Horizon 2020 – the framework programme for research and innovation, Brussels. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/proposals/communication_from_the_commission_-_horizon_2020_-_the_framework_programme_for_research_and_innovation.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
European Commission (2015) Horizon 2020 portal. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/. Accessed 7 Dec 2015
European Commission (2016) Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Commission (2017) Horizon 2020. Work programme 2018–2020. 16. Science with and for society. European Commission, Brussels
European Economic and Social Committee (2016) Responsible research and innovation in Europe and across the world. European Commission, Brussels
Fisher E, Rip A (2013) Responsible innovation: multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 165–183
Geoghegan-Quinn M (2012) Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society
Glerup C, Horst M (2014) Mapping ‘social responsibility’ in science. J Responsible Innov 1(1):31–50
GREAT-project (2013) GREAT. Governance of REsponsible innovATion. http://www.great-project.eu/. Accessed 24 Dec 2015
Grinbaum A, Groves C (2013) What is “responsible” about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 119–142
Grunwald A (2011) Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterp Work Innov Stud 7:9–31
Hartley S et al (2016) Against the tide of depoliticisation: the politics of research governance. Policy Polit 34(3):361–377
Jacob K et al (2013) Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 78. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2013
Klaassen P et al (2014) Policy brief on the state of the art on RRI and a working definition of RRI (D1.1). Athena Institute, Amsterdam. http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/107098/RRITools_D1.1-RRIPolicyBrief.pdf/c246dc97-802f-4fe7-a230-2501330ba29b. Accessed 26 July 2016
Lehoux P et al (2018) The unexplored contribution of responsible innovation in health to sustainable development goals. Sustainability 10(11):4015
Lubberink R et al (2017) Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: a systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability 9(5):721
Macnaghten P, Owen R (2011) Environmental science: good governance for geoengineering. Nature 479(7373):293–293
Macnaghten P et al (2014) Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. J Responsible Innov 1(2):191–199
New HoRRIzon (2017) New HoRRIzon project: promote the acceptance of RRI in Horizon 2020 and beyond. https://newhorrizon.eu/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017
NWO (2016) NWO-MVI (Maatschappelijk verantwoord innoveren). www.nwo.nl/onderzoek-en-resultaten/programmas/maatschappelijk+verantwoord+innoveren. Accessed 20 Feb 2016
Owen R et al (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760
Owen R et al (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 27–50
Pellizzoni L (2004) Responsibility and environmental governance. Environ Polit 13(3):541–565
Ribeiro BE et al (2016) A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation. Sci Eng Ethics 23(1):1–23
Rip A (2018) The past and future of RRI. In: Futures of science and technology in society. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp 115–133
Simakova E, Coenen C (2013) Visions, hype and expectations: a place for responsibility. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–267
Stahl BC (2013) Responsible research and innovation: the role of privacy in an emerging framework. Sci Public Policy 40(6):708–716
Stahl BC et al (2013) Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technology. Identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 199–218
Stilgoe J et al (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580
Strydom P (1999) The challenge of responsibility for sociology. Curr Sociol 47(3):65–82
Sutcliffe H (2011) A report on responsible research & innovation. http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRI-Report2.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2012
The Sustainable Development Goals & Responsible Innovation (2018) http://designforvalues.tudelft.nl/responsible-innovation-sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed: 26 Nov 2018
Timmermans JFC (2017) Mapping the RRI landscape: an overview of organisations, projects, persons, areas and topics. In: Asveld L et al (eds) Responsible innovation 3: a European agenda?. Responsible innovation. Springer, Dordrecht
Timmermans J, Blok V (2018) A critical hermeneutic reflection on the paradigm-level assumptions underlying responsible innovation. Synthese:1–32
US Congress (2003) 21st century nanotechnology research and development act of 2003. Public Law no. 108–153
van den Hoven MJ (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 75–84
van den Hoven MJ (2014) Responsible innovation: a new look at technology and ethics. In: van den Hoven MJ et al (eds) Responsible innovation 1. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–13
van den Hoven MJ et al (2011) Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Sci Eng Ethics 18(1):143–155
van Hove L, Wickson F (2017) Responsible research is not good science: divergences inhibiting the enactment of RRI in nanosafety. NanoEthics 11(3):213–228
van Oudheusden M (2014) Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. J Responsible Innov 1(1):67–86
Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74
Wickson F, Carew AL (2014) Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: learning from transdisciplinarity. J Responsible Innov 1(3):254–273
Zwart H et al (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’to ‘RRI’. Life Sci Soc Policy 10(1):1–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Timmermans, J. (2019). Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Decent Work and Economic Growth. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_46-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_46-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences