Skip to main content

Responsible Research and Innovation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 365 Accesses

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

Synonyms

Responsible innovation

Definitions

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a novel approach to the governance of science, research, and innovation (R&I) that seeks to broaden decision-making processes to realize ethically acceptable, societally desirable, and sustainable R&I. Although the concept is still debated, the following shared characteristics of RRI have been distinguished:

  1. 1.

    Diversity and inclusion

  2. 2.

    Anticipation and reflection

  3. 3.

    Openness and transparency

  4. 4.

    Responsiveness and adaptive change

  5. 5.

    Ethics

  6. 6.

    Social utility

Governance of Science, Research, and Innovation

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a novel approach to the governance of science, research, and innovation (for the sake of brevity abbreviated to R&I from now on) (Fisher and Rip 2013; Stilgoe et al. 2013). Governance can be understood as a complex multitude of language, agencies, and technologies that seek to shape individual and collective behavior (Glerup and Horst 2014). Nested in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Blok V, Lemmens P (2015) The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In: Koops B-J et al (eds) Responsible innovation 2. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Burget M et al (2017) Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci Eng Ethics 23(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Laas K (2014) “Broader impacts” or “Responsible research and innovation”? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering. Sci Eng Ethics 20(4):963–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Hoop E et al (2016) Limits to responsible innovation. J Responsible Innov 3(2):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Horizon 2020 – the framework programme for research and innovation, Brussels. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/proposals/communication_from_the_commission_-_horizon_2020_-_the_framework_programme_for_research_and_innovation.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2014

  • European Commission (2015) Horizon 2020 portal. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/. Accessed 7 Dec 2015

  • European Commission (2016) Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Horizon 2020. Work programme 2018–2020. 16. Science with and for society. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Economic and Social Committee (2016) Responsible research and innovation in Europe and across the world. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher E, Rip A (2013) Responsible innovation: multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 165–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan-Quinn M (2012) Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society

  • Glerup C, Horst M (2014) Mapping ‘social responsibility’ in science. J Responsible Innov 1(1):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREAT-project (2013) GREAT. Governance of REsponsible innovATion. http://www.great-project.eu/. Accessed 24 Dec 2015

  • Grinbaum A, Groves C (2013) What is “responsible” about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 119–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2011) Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterp Work Innov Stud 7:9–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley S et al (2016) Against the tide of depoliticisation: the politics of research governance. Policy Polit 34(3):361–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob K et al (2013) Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 78. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen P et al (2014) Policy brief on the state of the art on RRI and a working definition of RRI (D1.1). Athena Institute, Amsterdam. http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/107098/RRITools_D1.1-RRIPolicyBrief.pdf/c246dc97-802f-4fe7-a230-2501330ba29b. Accessed 26 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehoux P et al (2018) The unexplored contribution of responsible innovation in health to sustainable development goals. Sustainability 10(11):4015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubberink R et al (2017) Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: a systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability 9(5):721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten P, Owen R (2011) Environmental science: good governance for geoengineering. Nature 479(7373):293–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten P et al (2014) Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. J Responsible Innov 1(2):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New HoRRIzon (2017) New HoRRIzon project: promote the acceptance of RRI in Horizon 2020 and beyond. https://newhorrizon.eu/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • NWO (2016) NWO-MVI (Maatschappelijk verantwoord innoveren). www.nwo.nl/onderzoek-en-resultaten/programmas/maatschappelijk+verantwoord+innoveren. Accessed 20 Feb 2016

  • Owen R et al (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen R et al (2013) A framework for responsible innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 27–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzoni L (2004) Responsibility and environmental governance. Environ Polit 13(3):541–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro BE et al (2016) A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation. Sci Eng Ethics 23(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip A (2018) The past and future of RRI. In: Futures of science and technology in society. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp 115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Simakova E, Coenen C (2013) Visions, hype and expectations: a place for responsibility. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl BC (2013) Responsible research and innovation: the role of privacy in an emerging framework. Sci Public Policy 40(6):708–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl BC et al (2013) Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technology. Identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 199–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe J et al (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strydom P (1999) The challenge of responsibility for sociology. Curr Sociol 47(3):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe H (2011) A report on responsible research & innovation. http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRI-Report2.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2012

  • The Sustainable Development Goals & Responsible Innovation (2018) http://designforvalues.tudelft.nl/responsible-innovation-sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed: 26 Nov 2018

  • Timmermans JFC (2017) Mapping the RRI landscape: an overview of organisations, projects, persons, areas and topics. In: Asveld L et al (eds) Responsible innovation 3: a European agenda?. Responsible innovation. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans J, Blok V (2018) A critical hermeneutic reflection on the paradigm-level assumptions underlying responsible innovation. Synthese:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress (2003) 21st century nanotechnology research and development act of 2003. Public Law no. 108–153

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven MJ (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 75–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven MJ (2014) Responsible innovation: a new look at technology and ethics. In: van den Hoven MJ et al (eds) Responsible innovation 1. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven MJ et al (2011) Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Sci Eng Ethics 18(1):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hove L, Wickson F (2017) Responsible research is not good science: divergences inhibiting the enactment of RRI in nanosafety. NanoEthics 11(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oudheusden M (2014) Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. J Responsible Innov 1(1):67–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R et al (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wickson F, Carew AL (2014) Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: learning from transdisciplinarity. J Responsible Innov 1(3):254–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart H et al (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’to ‘RRI’. Life Sci Soc Policy 10(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Job Timmermans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Timmermans, J. (2019). Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Decent Work and Economic Growth. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_46-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_46-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics