Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological Footprint and Sustainable Development: A Two Way Approach

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Affordable and Clean Energy

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

  • 207 Accesses

Synonyms

Biocapacity; Carrying capacity; Ecological footprint; Environment; Sustainable development

Definitions

The concept of ecological footprint was first brought by Rees (1992) by using “human carrying capacity” and “natural capital” to understand the ecological perspectives in the global economic change. Later, the methodological and calculation of ecological footprint was developed by Wackernagel and Rees (1996) in their path breaking work “Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth.” Broadly ecological footprint represents the land area which is necessary to sustain the existing levels of resource consumption as well as waste discharge by that given population (Wackernagel and Rees 1997). It is also related to carrying capacity, which means the population can be supported indefinitely in a given habitat without permanently damaging the ecosystem (Wackernagel and Rees 1996; Bicknell et al. 1998).

The ecological footprint is a simple measure of sustainability,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alam MM, Molla RI, Rahman KM, Murad MW (2009) A paradox of the world population stabilization policy. J Dev Areas 43(1):331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U (2012) Factors affecting CO2, emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy 44(1):564–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U, Foon Tang C (2013) Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Energy Policy 60(0):813–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AK (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam M, Alam MM, Hafeez MH (2018) Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. J Cleaner Prod 190:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell KB, Ball RJ, Cullen R, Bigsby HR (1998) New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecol Econ 27:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers N, Simmons C, Wackernagel M (2000) Sharing nature’s interest: ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. Earthscan Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (2000) The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 32:341–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Heijungs R, Snoo GRD (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Indic 36:508–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala N (2008) Measuring sustainability: why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol Econ 67:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu W, Jonathan TC, Junquan Z, Guozhen D (2015) Ecological footprint (EF): an expanded role in calculating resource productivity (RP) using China and the G20 member countries as an example. Ecol Indic 48:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A (2015) On the rationale and policy usefulness of ecological footprint accounting: the case of Morocco. Environ Sci Policy 48:210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli G, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Wackernagel M, Iha K, Lazarus E (2014) Ecological footprint: implications for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 173:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Giampietro M, Goldfinger S, Lazarus E, Lin D, Saltelli A, Wackernagel M, Muller F (2016) Questioning the ecological footprint. Ecol Indic 69:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Iha K, Halle M, Bilali HE, Grunewald N, Eaton D, Capone R, Debs P, Bottalico F (2017) Mediterranean countries food consumption and sourcing patterns: an ecological footprint viewpoint. Sci Total Environ 578:383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’Brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2014) Global footprint network annual report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2015) Global footprint network annual report 2015. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2016) Global footprint network annual report 2016. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2017) Global footprint network annual report 2017. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Vallejo P, Marrero M, Solis-Guzman J (2015) The ecological footprint of dwelling construction in Spain. Ecol Indic 52:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossling S, Hansson CB, Horstmeier O, Saggel S (2002) Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Ecol Econ 43:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Murray SA (2001) A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecol Econ 37:229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D, Wackernagel M, Galli A, Kelly R (2016) Ecological footprint: informative and evolving- a response to van den Bergh and Grazi (2014). Ecol Indic 58:464–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulcic H, Cabezas H, Vujanovic M, Duic N (2016) Environmental assessment of different cement manufacturing process based on Emergy and ecological footprint analysis. J Clean Prod 130:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Public Works Government of Indonesia (2010) Ecological footprint of Indonesia. Directorate General of Spatial Planning Jakarta Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt I (2000) Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 32:359–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D (2004) Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran DD, Wackernagel M, Mathis K, Justin A, Goldfinger SH, Boutaud A (2008) Measuring sustainable development – nation by nation. Ecol Econ 64:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima ES, Ortega E (2016) Carrying capacity using Emergy and a new calculation of the ecological footprint. Ecol Indic 60:1200–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Our Common Future (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Al-mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1916–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out? Environ Urban 4(2):121–130

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Toth G, Szigeti C (2016) The historical ecological footprint: from over-population to over-consumption. Ecol Indic 60:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kooten GC, Bulte EH (2000) The ecological footprint: useful science or politics? Ecol Econ 32:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1997) Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecol Econ 20:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Linares AC, Lopez Falfan IS, Garcia JM, Guerrero AIS, Guerrero MGS (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Erb K-H, Haberl H, Schulz NB (2004a) Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach. Land Use Policy 21:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz NB, Erb K-H, Haberl H, Krausmann F (2004b) Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy 21:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzettel J, Steen-Olsen K, Hertwich EG, Borucke M, Galli A (2014) Ecological footprint of nations: comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input-output analysis. Ecol Econ 101:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Management Bodh Gaya, Turi Buzurg, India

    Tamali Chakraborty

  2. Department of Economics, FLAME University, Pune, India

    Barun Kumar Thakur

Authors
  1. Tamali Chakraborty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barun Kumar Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamali Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European School of Sustainability, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. Center for Neuroscience & Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Anabela Marisa Azul

  3. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo, Brazil

    Luciana Brandli

  4. Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Pinar Gökcin Özuyar

  5. International Centre for Thriving, University of Chester, Chester, UK

    Tony Wall

Section Editor information

  1. School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

    Md. Mahmudul Alam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chakraborty, T., Thakur, B.K. (2020). Ecological Footprint and Sustainable Development: A Two Way Approach. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Affordable and Clean Energy. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_41-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_41-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71057-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71057-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation