Affordable and Clean Energy

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Tony Wall

De-risking Investment in Power Projects

  • O. Alabi AyotomiwaEmail author
  • D. Nwobi Lucy
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_27-1
  • 112 Downloads

Definitions

De-risking according to the Oxford dictionary is used more often in the business context to take steps to make (something) less risky or less likely to involve a financial loss. In global banking, the concept of de-risking is an option for financial institutions to mitigate risk in banking by restricting its services to certain types of clients or customers.

De-risking refers to the practice whereby financial institutions exit relationships with and closing the accounts of clients perceived to be high risk. Adopting the concept in the power sector will require risk assessment for a better market design. Exploring how risk (for example, financing risk) can be managed by addressing the fundamental causes and distributing the residual risk evenly among all parties involved in the project. This is made possible through thorough investigation and development of risk analysis methods using project finance theory to manage risk peculiar to power projects.

Introduction

The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen F, Carletti E, Goldstein I, Leonello A (2017) Government guarantees and financial stability. European Central Bank working paper series. European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  2. Bielenberg A, Kerlin M, Oppenheim J, Roberts M (2016) Financing change: how to mobilize private-sector financing for sustainable infrastructure. McKinsey Center for Business and environmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Felder FA (1996) Integrating financial theory and methods in electricity resource planning. Energy Policy 24(2 SPEC):149–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00096-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frisari G, Micale V (2015) Risk mitigation instruments for renewable energy in developing countries: a case study on hydropower in Africa. San Giorgio Group ReportGoogle Scholar
  6. Gordon H (1996) Economic integration, intraindustry trade and frontier regions. Eur Econ Rev 40(3–5):941–949Google Scholar
  7. Guo X, Beskos A, Siddiqui A (2014) The natural hedge of a gas-fired power plant. Comput Manag Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-014-0222-xMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Honohan P (2010) Partial credit guarantees: principles and practice. J Financ Stab 6:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2009.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hossein R (1996) Financing oil and gas projects in developing countries. Financ Dev 33(2). http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/guarantees-program/brief/worldbank-guarantees-new-project-briefs
  10. IRENA (2016) Unlocking renewable energy investment: the role of risk mitigation and structured finance. IRENA, Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinloch S (2012) Partial risk guarantees and insurance products panel on the initiative for risk mitigation in Africa. African Development Bank. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Generic-Documents/Stewart%20Kinloch%20Presentation.pdf
  12. Klasen A (2014) Export credit guarantees and the demand for insurance. CESifo Forum, Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich 15(3):26–33Google Scholar
  13. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Omer AM (2010) Environmental and socio-economic aspects of possible development in renewable energy use. J Agric Ext Rural Dev 2(1):001–021. http://www.academicjournals.org/jaerdMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Oyedepo S, Fagbenle Richard, Adefila S, Adavbiele S (2014) Performance evaluation and economic analysis of a gas turbine power plant in Nigeria. Energy Conversion and Management 79:431–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roques FA, Nuttall WJ, Newbery D (2006) Using probabilistic analysis to value power generation investments under uncertainty.  https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.4961
  17. Scannella E (2012) Project finance in the energy industry: new debt-based financing models. Int Bus Res 5(2): 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trigeorgis L (1998) Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Vithayasrichareon P, MacGill I, Wen F (2015) Electricity generation portfolio analysis for coal, gas and nuclear plant under future uncertainties. The 4th IASTED Asian conference on power and energy systems, AsiaPESGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilson RB (2002) Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70(4):1299–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wynant L (1980) Essential elements of project financing. Harvard Bus Rev 58(3):165–173Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Petroleum Energy Economics and LawUniversity of IbadanOyo StateNigeria

Section editors and affiliations

  • Luciana Londero Brandli
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Passo FundoPasso FundoBrazil