Skip to main content

Drivers of Eco-Innovation and Leverage Through Sustainable Business Models

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Affordable and Clean Energy

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

  • 187 Accesses

Definition

The developments in our environment and society have revealed that the way we run our businesses and govern our nations is not sustainable in the long run (Boons et al. 2013; Aagaard 2019). For several years, many nations and companies have primarily acted on their own economic needs without any business considerations for the environment, and the visible consequences hereof strongly emphasize the need for companies to change their behavior toward more sustainable ways of doing business and innovation. These tendencies and developments have paved the way for eco-innovation. As social and natural needs become institutionalized through societal and cultural demands, business models will have to change radically (Birkin et al. 2009a, b), particularly as businesses are expected to ensure adaptations of these needs in order to secure legitimacy, legality, and business success. In the Lisbon Strategy, the European Commission has adopted action plans on sustainable innovation, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aagaard A (2019) Sustainable business models – Innovation, Implementation and Success. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aagaard A, Ritzén S (2018) Creating and capturing sustainable value through sustainable business models and service innovation. Presented at the 25th innovation & product development management conference in Porto, Portugal, 10–13 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plan 43:156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkin F, Cashman A, Koh SCL, Liu Z (2009a) New sustainable business models in China. Bus Strateg Environ 18:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkin F, Polesie T, Lewis L (2009b) A new business model for sustainable development: an exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Bus Strateg Environ 18:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons F (2009) Creating ecological value. In: An evolutionary approach to business strategies and the natural environment. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons F, Mendoza A (2010) Constructing sustainable palm oil: how actors define sustainability. J Clean Prod 18:1686–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons F, Montalvo C, Quist J, Wagner M (2013) Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J Clean Prod 45:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell R, and Zhu F (2013) Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Manage J 34:464–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S (2013) Simple rules for designing business models. Calif Manag Rev 55:97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom R (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation. Ind Corp Chang 11(3):529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Nies L, Ramani K (2008) A framework for the integration of environmental and business aspects toward sustainable product development. J Eng Des 19(5):431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortimiglia MN, Ghezzi A, Frank AG (2015) Business model innovation and strategy making nexus: evidence from a cross-industry mixed-methods study. R&D Manag 46(3):414–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer J, van der Heijden A, Jonker J (2006) Corporate social responsibility: making sense through thinking and acting. Bus Ethics 15(4):380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N (2006) Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Bus Soc 45(3):354–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker FGA, Groenewegen P, Den Hond F (2005) A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Bus Soc 44(3):283–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi V (2011) Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy 41(3):614–623

    Google Scholar 

  • del Río P, Peñasco C, Romero-Jordán D (2015) Distinctive features of environmental innovators: An econometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6):361–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganova L, Eyquem-Renault M (2009) What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy 38:1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran J, Ryan G (2016) The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 25:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 20.9.2011. COM (2011) 571 final

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy, COM (2015) 614/2

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber A, Frenken K (2009) Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technol Forecast Soc 76(4):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman AL, Miles S (2002) Developing stakeholder theory. J Manage Stud 39(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8):1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenfeld A, Roberts H (2000) Size matters: barriers and prospects for environmental management in small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Hillary R (ed) Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: business imperatives. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 106–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halila F (2007) Networks as a means of supporting the adoption of organizational innovations in SMEs: the case of environmental management systems (EMSs) based on ISO 14001. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 14(3):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL, Milstein MB (1999) Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Manag Rev 41:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmelskamp J (1997) Environmental policy instruments and their effects on innovation. Eur Plan Stud 5(2):177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation – new evidence from German panel data sources. Res Policy 37:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James P (1997) The sustainable circle: a new tool for product development and design. J Sustain Prod Des 2:52–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Hascic I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resour Econ 45:133–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaebernick H, Kara S, Sun M (2003) Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 19(6):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecol Econ 68(8/9):2285–2295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna M, Anton WRQ (2002) What is driving corporate environmentalism: opportunity or threat? Corp Environ Strateg 9(4):409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson AL (2000) Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurship lens. Bus Environ 9:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D, van Bakel JC, Whiteman G, Rotmans J (2009) Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems. Bus Strateg Environ 19(2):133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins AB, Lovins LH, Hawken P (1999) A road map for natural capitalism. Harv Bus Rev 77:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta J (2002) Why business models matter. Harvard Bus Rev 80:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin G, Lotti F (2017) Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents. Ind Corp Change 26(1):125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Siegel DS (2011) Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. J Manage 37(5):1480–1495

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Measuring the relationship between ICT and the environment. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Towards green growth. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oltra V, Kemp R, de Vries FP (2010) Patents as a measure for eco-innovation. Int J Environ Technol Manage 13:130–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A (2004) The business model ontology. In: A proposition in a design science approach. Université de Lausanne, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer K, Oaetes WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavelin S, Porter LA (2008) The corporate social performance content of innovation in the U.K. J Bus Ethics 80:711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264(4), p. 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings K (2000) Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32:319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag 28(2):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2011) Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation. Categories and interactions. Bus Strateg Environ 20(4):222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S, Spieth P (2013) Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. Int J Innov Manag 17:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Ricart JE (2014) Business model innovation – state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Mgt 44(3):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer S, Welford R, Hills P (2006) Engaging Hong Kong businesses in environmental change: drivers and barriers. Bus Strateg Environ 15(6):416–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijken K, Prince Y, Wolters T, Frey M, Mussati G, Kalff P, Hansen O, Kerndrup S, Sondergard B, Rodrigues EL, Meredith S (1999) Adoption of environmental innovations. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verschuuren J (2017) Does environmental law encourage obstruct eco-innovations? European Energy Environ Law Rev 26(2):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res Policy 36:1587–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R (2010) Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plan 43:216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: Recent developments and future research. J Manage 37(4):1019–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annabeth Aagaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aagaard, A. (2020). Drivers of Eco-Innovation and Leverage Through Sustainable Business Models. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Affordable and Clean Energy. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_14-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_14-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71057-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71057-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics