Information and Communication Technology and Educational Policies in the United States of America and Canada

  • Trina J. DavisEmail author
  • Joseph B. South
  • Katrina D. Stevens
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


This chapter reviews ICT and education policy in the United States and Canada; both countries have populations with diverse cultures, languages, socioeconomics, and ideologies. Generally local school authorities provide education, while state/territory and national bodies exert influence. Focus areas in this chapter include ICT infrastructure, protections for student data and privacy, data interoperability, personalized learning, online assessment, and updates to national technology standards and frameworks. In addition to evolving infrastructure, issues related to supporting “future-ready” learning, perhaps of equal importance, is the ongoing evidence-based evaluation of educational technology and effort to increase the pace and rigor of evidence associated with educational technology purchases and renewals by school districts. Some school systems are moving toward a competency-based education (CBE) model which often requires policy shifts. There is growing interest in exploring new models for teacher preparation and development as well as calls for increased personalization of student learning. Policy debates continue around the degree of equal access to technology that government should require, including whether parity should be required in terms of device age and availability, quality and availability of digital learning materials, and classroom bandwidth and whether the technology is being used actively or passively by students across all socioeconomic groups and across all schools. As policy makers grapple with the displacement of jobs and loss of employment due to advances in technology and continued growth in income inequality, they may turn to policies that encourage better alignment between K-12 education and the skills needed for future careers.


Technology Educational policies United States Canada 


  1. Alberta Ministry of Education. (2013). Learning and technology policy framework. Retrieved from
  2. Anderson, R., & Dexter, S. (2009). National policies and practices in ICT in education: United States of America. In Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (pp. 697–715). Charlotte: IAP-Information Age Pub.Google Scholar
  3. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149. Retrieved from Scholar
  4. C21 Canada. (2012). Shifting minds: A 21st century vision of public education for Canada. Retrieved from
  5. Cator, K. Schneider, C., & Vander Ark, T. (2014). Preparing teachers for deeper learning: Competency-based teacher preparation and development. Retrieved from
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). About the standards. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website:
  7. Consortium of School Networking. (2016). CoSN’s 2016 annual E-rate and infrastructure survey. Retrieved from CoSN website:
  8. Council of Ministers of Education Canada. (2011). Canada’s Ministers of Education move ahead on Pan-Canadian priorities. Retrieved from
  9. Council of Ministers of Education Canada. (2017). Education in Canada: An overview. Retrieved from
  10. Davis, T., Fuller, M., Jackson, S., Pittman, J., & Sweet, J. (2007). A national consideration of digital equity. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education. Scholar
  11. Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning (Students at the Center: Deeper Learning Research Series). Boston: Jobs for the Future.Google Scholar
  12. Digital Promise. (2014). Improving ed-tech purchasing: Identifying the key obstacles and potential solutions for the discovery and acquisition of k-12 personalized learning and tools. Retrieved from
  13. Educational Testing Service. (2016). The road ahead for state assessments: What the assessment consortia built, why it matters, and emerging options. Available online:
  14. Fullan, M., & Donnelly, K. (2013). Alive in the swamp: Assessing digital innovations in education. London: Nesta. Available online: Scholar
  15. Government of Canada. (2017). Justice laws website: Personal information protection and electronic documents act. Retrieved from
  16. Gronneberg, J., & Johnston, S. (2015, April 6). 7 things you should know about universal design for learning [Brief]. Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved from
  17. Hoechsmann, M., & DeWaard, H. (2015) Mapping digital literacy policy and practice in the Canadian education landscape: MediaSmarts. Available at
  18. International Society for Technology in Education (2007). International society for technology in education standards for students, Washington, DC: ISTE.Google Scholar
  19. International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). International Society for Technology in Education standards for students. Washington, DC: ISTE.Google Scholar
  20. Library of Congress. (2015). Online privacy law: Canada. Retrieved from
  21. Milton, P. (2015). Shifting minds 3.0: Redefining the learning landscape in Canada. Retrieved from
  22. Molnar, M. (2017). Market is booming for digital formative assessments. Education Week, March 24. Retrieved from
  23. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2016).
  24. Nunavut. (2016). Curriculum and learning resources. Retrieved from
  25. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario: Foundation document for discussion. Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. Retrieved from Scholar
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scholar
  27. Pace, L., Moyer, J., & Williams, M. (2015). Building consensus and momentum: A policy and political landscape for K-12 competency based education. KnowledgeWorks. February 2015. Retrieved from
  28. Patrick, S., & Sturgis, C. (2013). Necessary for success: Building mastery of world-class skills: A competency works issue brief. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. Retrieved from
  29. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. (2017). Connecting students across Ontario with faster internet. Retrieved from
  30. Rich, T. (2009). National policies and practices in ICT in education: Canada. In Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (pp. 119–133). Information Age Publishing (IAP).Google Scholar
  31. Statista. (n.d.). Enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools in Canada 2000 to 2015. Retrieved from
  32. U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Office of Educational Technology, international experiences with educational technology: Final report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Office of Educational Technology, future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Department of Education. (2017a). Office of Educational Technology, reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National education technology plan update. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2017b). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A supplement to the national educational technology plan. Retrieved from
  36. U.S. Department of Education & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Early learning and educational technology policy brief. Retrieved from
  37. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (n.d.). Educational technology rapid cycle evaluations. Retrieved from
  38. Vander Ark, T., & Schneider, C. (2012). How digital learning contributes to deeper learning. Getting Smart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trina J. Davis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph B. South
    • 2
  • Katrina D. Stevens
    • 3
  1. 1.Texas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.International Society for Technology in EducationArlingtonUSA
  3. 3.Chan Zuckerberg InitiativeBaltimoreUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Birgit Eickelmann
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations