Teachers as Drivers of Their Professional Learning Through Design Teams, Communities, and Networks

  • Sarah PrestridgeEmail author
  • Katherine Main
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


Engaging teachers in cooperative and collaborative processes through which they learn from each other is fundamental in rethinking professional development as being ‘done’ to teachers compared with teachers ‘doing’ or driving their professional learning. This rethinking is underpinned by opportunities that have arisen not only through social networks and the pervasiveness of online media but also from the shift in valuing the exploration of individual interests and needs as well as in the pedagogical reform process. The tenets of effective professional learning, namely, active engagement, teacher voice, creation and collaboration, inquiry and reflection, will be explored in this chapter through two modes of discourse. First, a reckoning of what counts as professional learning activities is proposed to establish the driving force or purpose for teacher learning. This is then developed further in the second part of this chapter where we discuss the various approaches to professional learning with a theoretical analysis of teacher collaboration, teacher teams, communities of practice, and broader social networks. Understanding the genesis, development, and purpose of professional engagement and interaction is key to supporting teachers as the ‘deliverers’ of educational reform who are those tasked with transforming education through ICT.


Professional learning Professional Development Social Networking Teacher Teams Communities of Practice 


  1. Adger, C., Hoyle, S., & Dickinson, D. (2004). Locating learning in in–service education for preschool teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 867–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers, P., Pace, C., & Brown, D. W., Jr. (2013). Critical participation in literacy research through new and emerging technologies: A study of web seminars and global engagement. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14(2), 78–114.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Zaidiyeen, N., Lai Mei, L., & Fook, F. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2012). Accreditation of Initial Teacher Education Programs in Australia: Guide to the accreditation process, April 2012. Retrieved from
  5. Bigum, C. (2002). Design sensibilities, schools and the new computing communication technologies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies. Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 130–140). New Fetter Lane, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Blitz, C. L. (2013). Can online learning communities achieve the goals of traditional professional learning communities? What the literature says. REL 2013-003. Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic, Calverton, MD.
  7. Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. (2012). Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1206–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, S., Mulholland, J., & Branson, C. (2013). Professional learning in the lives of teachers: Towards a new framework for conceptualising teacher learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45–58). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DuFour, R. (2014). Harnessing the power of PLCs. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 30–35.Google Scholar
  12. Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403–422.Google Scholar
  13. Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(4), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen's vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182.Google Scholar
  15. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, L. (2014). Leadership for professional development and learning: Enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foulger, T. S., Ewbank, A. D., Kay, A., Popp, S. O., & Carter, H. L. (2009). Moral spaces in MySpace: Preservice teachers’ perspectives about ethical issues in social networking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldman, S., & Lucas, R. (2012). Issues in the transformation of teaching with technology. Paper presented at Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE), Austin.Google Scholar
  20. Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2014). Tweet me, message me, like me: Using social media to facilitate pedagogical change within an emerging community of practice. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 927–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoekstra, A., Beijaard, D., Brekelmans, M., & Korthagen, F. (2007). Experienced teachers’ informal learning from classroom teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lankshear, C., & Bigum, B. (1999). Literacies and new technologies in school settings. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 7(3), 445–465.
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In J. Lave & E. Wenger (Eds.), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (pp. 90–117). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2014). Chapter 1, Teachers as professionals: Evolving definitions of staff development. In L. Martin, S. Kragler, D. Quatroche, & K. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, PreK-12 (pp. 3–21). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Lin, F. R., Lin, S. C., & Huang, T. P. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community. Computers & Education, 50(3), 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
  27. Little, J. W. (1999). Organising schools for teacher learning. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 233–262). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Macdonald, J., & Poniatowska, B. (2011). Designing the professional development of staff for teaching online: An OU (UK) case study. Distance Education, 32, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Main, K. (2012). Effective middle school teacher teams: A ternary model of interdependency rather than a catch phrase. Teachers and Teaching, 18(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Main, K. (2017). Chapter 12, Teams and teaming. In D. Pendergast, K. Main, & N. Bahr (Eds.), Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (3rd ed.). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  31. Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, M. W. (1994). Strategic sites for teachers’ professional development. In P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change (pp. 31–51). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicolaides, V. C., LaPort, K. A., Chen, T. R., Tomassetti, A. J., Weis, E. J., Zaccaro, S. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2014). The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 923–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niesz, T. (2007). Why teacher networks (can) work. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(8), 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS (Teaching and Learning International Survey). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Petras, Y., Jamil, H., & Mohamed, A. R. (2012). How do teachers learn? A study on the policy and practice of teacher professional development in Malaysia. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 9(1). Retrieved from
  38. Phelps, R., Graham, A., & Watts, T. (2011). Acknowledging the complexity and diversity of historical and cultural ICT professional learning practices in schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prestridge, S. (2013). Three key elements in ICT professional Development. In International Society for Technology in Education: Expanding horizons, ISTE.Google Scholar
  41. Prestridge, S. (2016). Conceptualising self-generating online teacher professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education.
  42. Prestridge, S. (2017). Examining the shaping of teachers’ pedagogical orientation for the use of technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26 (4), 1–15.
  43. Prestridge, S., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Exploring elements that support teachers’ engagement in online professional development. Special Issue: Web-Mediated Approaches to Teachers’ Professional Development. Education Sciences, 5(1).
  44. Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J. J., Cunningham, F. C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2011). How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raphael, T., Vasquez, J., Fortune, A., Gavelek, J., & Au, K. (2014). Chapter 8, Sociocultural approaches to professional development: Supporting sustainable school change. In L. Martin, S. Kragler, D. Quatroche, & K. Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, Prek-12 (pp. 145–173). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Shipley, W. (2009). Examining teacher collaboration in a kindergarten building: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  47. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smylie, M. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. Guskey & M. Humberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sumuer, E., Esfer, S., & Yildirim, S. (2014). Teachers’ Facebook use: Their use habits, intensity, self-disclosure, privacy settings, and activities on Facebook. Educational Studies, 40(5), 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsai, C., & Chai, C. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers’ presence in on-line learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 396–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Voogt, J., Pieters, J., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation.
  56. Vu, P., Cao, V., Vu, L., & Cepero, J. (2014). Factors driving learner success in online professional development. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3). Retrieved from
  57. Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 756–782). Reston/Lanham: Assocation of Teacher Educators/Rowman.Google Scholar
  58. Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers’ online collaborative learning activities. Computers & Education, 104, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Peter Albion
    • 1
  • Jo Tondeur
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Teacher Education and Early ChildhoodUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations