Advertisement

Information and Communication Competences for Students

  • Koen Aesaert
  • Johan van Braak
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The general aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the main results of educational research studying 1) the concept of ICT competence; 2) the assessment of ICT competences and 3) characteristics related to differences in ICT competences. More specifically, the relationship between student, teacher and school level characteristics and primary school students’ ICT competences is described in the context of direct, performance-based assessment. At the end of the chapter, three underlying topics that are important for future research are discussed, that is, 1) the difference between the theoretical and empirical dimensionality of ICT competences; 2) the development of user-friendly assessment instruments; and 3) the need for research focusing on alternative ICT competences.

Keywords

ICT competences Primary education Assessment 

References

  1. Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). Exploring factors related to primary school pupils’ ICT self-efficacy: A multilevel approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance-based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aesaert, K., van Nijlen, D., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2014). Direct measures of digital information processing and communication skills in primary education: Using item response theory for the development and validation of an ICT competence scale. Computers & Education, 76, 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aesaert, K., Van Nijlen, D., Vanderlinde, R., Tondeur, J., Devlieger, I., & van Braak, J. (2015). The contribution of pupil, classroom and school level characteristics to primary school pupils’ ICT competences: A performance-based approach. Computers & Education, 87, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appel, M. (2012). Are heavy users of computer games and social media more computer literate? Computers & Education, 59, 1339–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballantine, J. A., McCourt Larres, P., & Oyelere, P. (2007). Computer usage and the validity of self-assessed computer competence among first-year business students. Computers & Education, 49(4), 976–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervind, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christoph, G., Goldhammer, F., Zylka, J., & Hartig, J. (2015). Adolescents computer performance: The role of self-concept and motivational aspects. Computers & Education, 81, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martin, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., … Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053.Google Scholar
  13. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). Improving quality in education. Dynamic approaches to school improvement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Drabowicz, T. (2014). Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 countries. Computers & Education, 74, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, M. B. (2005). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. In Y. Punie & B. N. Brecko (Eds.), JRC scientific and policy reports. Spain: European Commission.Google Scholar
  18. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 23(14), 1239–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatlevik, O. E., Gitmundsdottir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015a). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatlevik, O. E., Ottestad, G., & Throndsen, I. (2015b). Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2013). Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(4), 639–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huggins, A. C., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Dawson, K. (2014). Measuring information and communication technology literacy using a performance assessment: Validation of the student tool for technology literacy (ST2L). Computers & Education, 72, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jara, I., Claro, M., Hinostroza, J. E., San Martin, E., Rodriguez, P., & Labbé, C. (2015). Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed methods analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students’ internet skills. Computers & Education, 49, 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K_12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Internet self-efficacy and preferences toward constructivist internet-based learning environments: A study of preschool teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 226–237.Google Scholar
  31. Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users’ internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15(4), 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markauskaite, L. (2007). Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: The main components and relationships between general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(6), 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age: Preview of part 1. In A. Martin & D. Madigan (Eds.), Digital literacies for learning (pp. 3–26). London: Facet Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Meelissen, M. (2008). Computer attitudes and competencies among primary and secondary school students. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 381–395). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merritt, K., Smith, K. D., & Di Renzo, J. C. (2005). An investigation of self-reported computer literacy: Is it reliable? Issues in Information Systems, 6(1), 289–295.Google Scholar
  39. Papastergiou, M. (2010). Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ self-efficacy and attitudes regarding information and communication technologies through a computer literacy course. Computers & Education, 54, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers & Education, 102, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scherer, R., Rohatgi, A., & Hatlevik, O. (2017). Students’ profiles of ICT use: Identification, determinants, and relations to achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – a systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19, 58–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in digital networks – ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers & Education, 109, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tannenbaum, R. S., & Rahn, B. J. (1984). Teaching computer literacy to humanities and social science students. Academe, 70(4), 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas, L. G., & Knezek, D. G. (2008). Information, communications, and educational technology standards for students, teachers, and school leaders. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 333–348). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Deursen, A. (2012). Internet skill-related problems in accessing online health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Deursen, A., & van Diepen, S. (2013). Information and strategic internet skills of secondary students: A performance test. Computers & Education, 63, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2016). Modeling traditional literacy, internet skills and internet usage: An empirical study. Interacting with Computers, 28, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2005). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils’ use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45(1), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wirth, J. (2008). Computer-based tests: Alternatives for test and item design. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (pp. 235–252). Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gerald Knezek
    • 1
  • Rhonda Christensen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of North TexasDentonUSA
  2. 2.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations