Cultural and Social Issues in Using Social Media to Support Learning

  • Royce KimmonsEmail author
  • Olga Belikov
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


The widespread use of social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) has led many researchers and practitioners to explore their benefits for education, including their ability to connect people together in ways that value diverse perspectives, creativity, and individual expression. However, there are some complex cultural and social aspects of these tools that deserve attention and that educators and students should be aware of. In this chapter, we explore a variety of issues through the themes of (1) literacy, (2) privacy, (3) civility, and (4) identity. Literacy issues include digital participation divides and the ways that differences in abilities among students to use these tools lead to inequities in educational and social opportunities. Privacy issues include those involving the sharing of personal information via ubiquitous, persistent technologies and the subsequent hierarchical and lateral surveillance that this enables. Civility issues include cyberbullying and other utilizations of these media to manipulate the emotional states and social standing of others through dehumanization, decontextualization, and persistent abuse. And identity issues include those arising from the incomplete, skewed, or performative expression of identity via social media and subsequent tensions that arise between the use of acceptable identity fragments and the reductionism that occurs as authentic identity is translated into online spaces. With each of these themes, we explore pertinent problems that arise in social media (e.g., echo chambers, incivility, identity collapse) and also provide suggestions for educators to alleviate their severity.


Social media Literacy Civility Identity Privacy Digital divides Cyberbullying  


  1. Andersson, A., Hatakka, M., Grönlund, Å., & Wiklund, M. (2014). Reclaiming the students: Coping with social media in 1:1 schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, M. (2005). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4), 479–497.Google Scholar
  3. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The international review of research in open and distributed. Learning, 13(1), 56–71.Google Scholar
  4. Bobkowski, P. S., & Pearce, L. D. (2011). Baring their souls in online profiles or not? Religious self-disclosure in social media. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(4), 744–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. boyd, M. D., & Ellison, B. N. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carraro, L., Castelli, L., Breazu, I., Campomizzi, G., Cerruto, A., Mariani, M., & Toto, I. (2012). Just ignore or counterattack? On the effects of different strategies for dealing with political attacks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 789–797. Scholar
  7. Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Common Sense Media. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Common Sense Media. Retrieved from
  9. Davidson, T., & Farquhar, L. K. (2014). Correlates of social anxiety, religion, and Facebook. Journal of Media and Religion, 13(4), 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Facebook. (2015). Terms of service. Facebook. Retrieved from
  11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Carden City/New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Goodlad, J. I., Mantle-Bromley, C., & Goodlad, S. J. (2004). Education for everyone. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–11.Google Scholar
  15. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2012). School climate 2.0: Preventing cyberbullying and sexting one classroom at a time. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. John, N. A., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I don’t like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 953–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimmons, R. (2014). Social networking sites, literacy, and the authentic identity problem. TechTrends, 58(2), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2014). The fragmented educator 2.0: Social networking sites, acceptable identity fragments, and the identity constellation. Computers & Education, 72, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2015). Teacher professionalization in the age of social networking sites. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 480–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kimmons, R., McGuire, K., Stauffer, M., Jones, J. E., Gregson, M., & Austin, M. (2017). Religious identity, expression, and civility in social media: Results of data mining Latter-day Saint Twitter accounts. J Sci Study Relig 56(3), 637–657.Google Scholar
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemke, J., & Van Helden, C. (2009). New learning cultures: Identities, media, and networks. In R. Goodfellow & M. Lamy (Eds.), Learning cultures in online education (pp. 151–169). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  25. Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stepler, R., Rainie, L., & Parker, K. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015: Smartphones facilitate shifts in communication landscape for teens. Pew Internet Research Center. Retrieved from
  26. Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London: Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved from Scholar
  28. Marwick, A. E. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mower, D., & Robison, W. L. (2013). Civility in politics and education. Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, T., & Smith, P. (2004). Emotional and behavioural responses to everyday incivility: Challenging the fear/avoidance paradigm. Journal of Sociology, 40(4), 378–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., … & Kordic, T. (2015). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e66–e72.Google Scholar
  32. Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 1–10.Google Scholar
  34. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1.) Retrieved from
  35. Solis, B., & Breakenridge, D. (2009). Putting the public back in public relations. Upper Saddle Ridge: Pearson.Google Scholar
  36. Statista. (2016). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2016 (in millions). Statista. Retrieved from
  37. Statistics Brain. (2016). YouTube company statistics. Statistics Brain. Retrieved from
  38. Valenzuela, A. (2010). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  39. Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. West, D., & Kimmons, R. (2017). Twitter in education. In R. Hobbs & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instructional Psychology & TechnologyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kwok-Wing Lai
    • 1
  • Keryn Pratt
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Otago College of EducationDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of Otago College of EducationNorth DunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations