Improvement Science Through Networked Improvement Communities: Leadership of Continuous Improvement with, of, and Through Information Technology

  • David H. Eddy-SpicerEmail author
Reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


Improvement science through networked improvement communities offers leaders of IT a systematic approach to quality improvement in education, which can be applied when implementing IT in schools.


Continuous improvement Organizational learning Networks Participative decision making Educational change 


  1. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America's schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berwick, D. M. (1996). A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 312(7031), 619–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
  4. Dexter, S. (2017). The networking tool. Retrieved from
  5. Englebart, D. (2003). Improving our ability to improve: A call for investment in a new future. IBM Co-Evolution Symposium. Retrieved from
  6. Health Foundation. (2011). Evidence scan: improvement science. Retrieved from
  7. Greenberg, S., Kawar, A., Tinker, A., & Zarichansky, D. (2017). Seeing the system from the user’s point of view through journey maps. Presentation at the Carnegie Summit on Improvement in Education, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Holt, M. (1993). The educational consequences of W. Edwards Deming. The Phi Delta Kappan, 74(5), 382–388.Google Scholar
  9. Langley, G. J., Moen, R. D., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2014). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. LeMahieu, P. G., Grunow, A., Baker, L., Nordstrum, L. E., & Gomez, L. M. (2017). Networked improvement communities: The discipline of improvement science meets the power of networks. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 5–25. Scholar
  11. Leonard, J. F. (1996). The new philosophy for K-12 education: A Deming framework for transforming America’s schools. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61. Scholar
  13. Mintrop, R. (2016). Design-based school improvement: A practical guide for education leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  14. Perkins, D. (2008). Beyond understanding. In R. Land, J. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (Vol. 16, pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J., Gomez, L. M., LeMahieu, P., & Grunow, A. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–36.Google Scholar
  16. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (2005). Do technologies make us smarter?: Intellectual amplification with, of, and through technology. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 71–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist impact evaluation: an introduction. Retrieved from London, UK:
  18. Yeager, D. S., Bryk, A. S., Muhich, J., Hausman, H., & Morales, L. (2013). Practical measurement. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sara Dexter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations