Abstract
In architectural research, debates about the development, function, or appropriateness of building forms have traditionally been dominated by qualitative approaches. These have been common in the past because the full geometric complexity of a building has proven difficult to encapsulate in any single measurement system. Even simple buildings may be made up of many thousands of separate changes in geometry, which combine together across multiple scales to create a habitable or functional structure. However, since the 1990s architectural scholars have begun to adopt one particular method for mathematically examining the form of a building. This method relies on fractal dimensions, which are measures of the characteristic complexity of an image, object, or set. This chapter introduces fractal dimensions and the primary method used to measure them in architecture, the box-counting approach. The chapter describes key methodological variables and limits that are pertinent to its application in architecture, and then it summarizes the results of past research using this approach. The paper concludes with a tabulated set of typical fractal dimension ranges for sets of plans and elevations of designs by 11 famous architects or practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Asvestas P, Matsopoulos G, Nikita K (2000) Applications of fractal theory on medical data processing. In: Marsh A, Grandinetti L, Kauranne T (eds) Advanced infrastructures for future healthcare. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 425–411
Bechhoefer W, Bovill C (1994) Fractal analysis of traditional housing in Amasya, Turkey. Tradit Dwellings Settlements Work Pap Ser 61:1–21
Bovill C (1996) Fractal geometry in architecture and design. Birkhäuser, Boston
Burkle-Elizondo G (2001) Fractal geometry in Mesoamerica. Symmetry: Cult Sci 12:201–214
Burkle-Elizondo G, Valdez-Cepeda RD (2001) Do the Mesoamerican artistic and architectural works have a fractal dimension? In: Novak MM (ed) Emergent nature. Patterns, growth and scaling in the sciences. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 431–432
Çagdaş G, Gözübüyük G, Ediz Ö (2005) Fractal based generative design for harmony between old and new. In: Generative Art 2005, Milan, Italy, 15–17 December, Domus Argenia, Milan, pp 150–159
Capo D (2004) The fractal nature of the architectural orders. Nexus Netw J 6:30–40
Debailleux L (2010) Complementary approach for vernacular wooden frame structures reconstruction. In: Digital heritage, third international Euro-mediterranean conference, Euromed 2010, Lemessos, Cyprus, 8–13 Nov. Springer, Berlin, pp 441–449
Ediz Ö, Ostwald MJ (2012) The Süleymaniye Mosque: a computational fractal analysis of visual complexity and layering in Sinan’s masterwork. arq: Archit Res Q 16:171–182
Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New York
Li J, Du Q, Sun C (2009) An improved box-counting method for image fractal dimension estimation. Pattern Recogn 42:2460–2469
Lorenz WE (2003) Fractals and fractal architecture. Masters dissertation. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna
Lorenz W E (2012) Estimating the fractal dimension of architecture: Using two measurement methods implemented in AutoCAD by VBA. In Digital Physicality, eCAADe 2012, Prague, Czech Republic, 12–14 Sept. ČVUT, Prague, pp 505–513
Mandelbrot BB (1977) Fractals: form, chance and dimension. W.H. Freeman, New York
Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Oleschko K, Brambila R, Brambila F, Parrot J-F, López P (2000) Fractal analysis of Teotihuacan, Mexico. J Archaeol Sci 27:1007–1016
Ostwald MJ (2001) Fractal architecture: late twentieth century connections between architecture and fractal geometry. Nexus Network Journal 3:73–84
Ostwald MJ (2003) Fractal architecture: the philosophical implications of an iterative design process. Commun Cogn 36:263–295
Ostwald MJ (2013) The fractal analysis of architecture: calibrating the box-counting method using scaling coefficient and grid disposition variables. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 40:644–663
Ostwald MJ, Ediz Ö (2015) Measuring form, ornament and materiality in Sinan’s Kılıç Ali Paşa Mosque: an analysis using fractal dimensions. Nexus Netw J 17:5–22
Ostwald MJ, Vaughan J (2009) Visual qualities in early modern and late modern architecture: a mathematical comparison of formal complexity in the houses of gray and Sejima. In: Gu N, Ostwald MJ, Williams A (eds) Computing, cognition and education: recent research in the architectural sciences. ANZAScA, Sydney, pp 9–32
Ostwald MJ, Vaughan J (2013) Representing architecture for fractal analysis: a framework for identifying significant lines. Archit Sci Rev 56(3):242–251
Ostwald MJ, Vaughan J (2016) The fractal dimension of architecture. Birkhauser, Cham
Rian IM, Park J-H, Ahn HU, Chang D (2007) Fractal geometry as the synthesis of Hindu cosmology in Kandariya Mahadev temple, Khajuraho. Build Environ 42:4093–4107
Vaughan J, Ostwald MJ (2008) Approaching Euclidean limits: a fractal analysis of the architecture of Kazuyo Sejima. In: Innovation inspiration and instruction: new knowledge in the architectural sciences: ANZAScA 08, Newcastle, Australia, 26–28 Nov. ANZAScA, Newcastle, pp 285–294
Vaughan J, Ostwald MJ (2010) Using fractal analysis to compare the characteristic complexity of nature and architecture: re-examining the evidence. Archit Sci Rev 53:323–332
Vaughan J, Ostwald MJ (2011) The relationship between the fractal dimension of plans and elevations in the architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright: comparing the prairie style, textile block and Usonian periods. ArS Archit Sci 4:21–44
Voss RF (1986) Characterization and measurement of random fractals. Phys Scr T13:27–32
Voss RF (1988) Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In: Peitgen HO, Saupe D, Barnsley MF (eds) The science of fractal images. Springer, New York, pp 21–70
Wen K-C, Kao Y-N (2005) An analytic study of architectural design style by fractal dimension method. In: 2005 Proceedings of the 22nd ISARC, ISARC, Ferrara, Italy, pp 1–6
Zarnowiecka J C (2002) In search of new computer tools: what does Bovill really measure in architecture? In: Connecting the real and the virtual – design education 20th eCAADe conference proceedings, eCAADe, Warsaw, pp 342–345
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ostwald, M.J., Vaughan, J. (2018). Fractal Dimensions in Architecture: Measuring the Characteristic Complexity of Buildings. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_12-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_12-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Fractal Dimensions in Architecture: Measuring the Characteristic Complexity of Buildings- Published:
- 26 September 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_12-2
-
Original
Fractal Dimensions in Architecture: Measuring the Characteristic Complexity of Buildings- Published:
- 01 June 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_12-1