Gender Equality

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women

  • Fabiana PaesEmail author
  • André Geraldes
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_39-1

One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”, Simone de Beauvoir (1989)

Definition

One of the main documents in international law related to women’s right is the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (the Women’s Convention or the CEDAW Convention). This treaty is seen as “an international bill of rights for women,” because it obliges States Parties to undertake the necessary legal strategies and programmatic procedures to ensure women’s full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental liberties (Byrnes and Freeman 2012; Byrnes 2012a). The Convention was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1979, by votes of 130 to none, with 10 abstentions. It entered into force on September 3, 1981, with the deposit of 20 ratifications. As of July 8, 2018, there were 189 States Parties to the Convention. Somalia, Sudan, and Iran have not become party to the CEDAW up to now. The United States signed the CEDAW, but it remains in the Senate...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akehurst M (1988) A modern introduction to international law, 6th edn. George Allen & Unwin (Publishers), LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander R (2002) Domestic violence in Australia: the legal response. The Federation Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  3. Anaya SJ (2004) Indigenous people in international law. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews P (2003) Women’s human rights and the conversation across cultures. Albany Law Rev 67:609–617Google Scholar
  5. Ashworth G (1993) Changing the discourse: a guide to women and human rights. Change, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Askin KD, Koenig D (1999) Women and international human rights law, vol I–III. Transnational Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Azeiteiro U, Gonçalves F, Leal Filho W, Morgado F, Pereira M (eds) (2004) World trends in environmental education. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  8. Azeiteiro U, Gonçalves F, Leal Filho W, Morgado F, Pereira M, Pereira R (eds) (2008) Science and environmental education. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  9. Barsted LL (2001) Lei e Realidade Social: Igualdade x Desigualdade. In: As Mulheres e os Direitos Humanos: Coletânea Traduzindo a legislação com a perspectiva de gênero. Cepia, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayefsky A (2000) CEDAW: threat to, or enhancement of, human rights. Am Soc Int Law Proc 94:197–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blay EA (2008) Assassinato de Mulheres e Direitos Humanos. Editora 34, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown A (1995) Reshaping the rhetoric: the nexus of violence, poverty, and minority status in the lives of women and children in the United States. Georgetown J Fight Poverty III(1):17–23Google Scholar
  13. Buckley H, Whelan S, Holt S (2006) Listen to Me!, Children’s experience of domestic violence. Research Commissioned by Mayo Women’s Support Services, DublinGoogle Scholar
  14. Buergenthal T, Shelton D (1995) Protecting human rights in the Americas – cases and materials, 4th edn. International Institute of Human Rights, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  15. Byrnes A (1989) The other human rights treaty body: the work of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women. Yale J Int Law 14(1):1Google Scholar
  16. Byrnes A (2012a) The Impact of the CEDAW convention: paths to equality. In: The World Bank, World Development Report 2012, Gender, Equality and Development, The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Byrnes A (2012b) Article 1 (CEDAW). In: Freeman MA, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) CEDAW, commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–70Google Scholar
  18. Byrnes A, Adams K (1999) Gender equality and the judiciary. Commonwealth Secretariat, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Byrnes A, Connors J (1996) Enforcing the human rights of women: a complaint procedure for the women convention. Brooklyn J Int Law 21:679Google Scholar
  20. Byrnes A, Emerton R, Adams K, Connors J (2005) International women’s rights cases. Cavendish Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Byrnes A, Freeman M (2012) The Impact of the CEDAW Convention: Paths to Equality, 2012, World Development Report 2012, Gender, Equality and Development. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Campbell JC, Webster D et al (2003) Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. J Public Health 93:1083–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Center for Studies of Human Rights. Woman and human rights: the basic documents. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR-PUB-14-2.pdf. At 26 June 2018
  24. Chalesworth H, Chinkin C (2000) The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  25. Charlesworth H (1997) In: Gilligan B, Sampford C (eds) Taking gender rights seriously: rethinking human rights. The Federation Press, Alexandria, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Charlesworth H, Chinkin C (1994) Violence against women: a global issue. In: Stubbs J (ed) Women male violence, the law, vol 6. The Institute of Criminology Monograph Series, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  27. Cook RJ (1990) The women’s convention: opportunities for the commonwealth. Commonw Law Rev 16:610–619Google Scholar
  28. Cook RJ (1994) Enforcing women’s international human rights. In: Women’s rights: human rights. Hestia, AthensGoogle Scholar
  29. Cook S, Bessant J (1997) Women’s encounters with violence: Australian experiences. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Coussins A (2003) Saints, sluts and sexual assault: rethinking the relationship between sex, race and gender. Soc Leg Stud 12:77–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum 140:139–167Google Scholar
  32. Crenshaw K (1990/1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 43:1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crooms LA (1997) Indivisible rights and intersectional identities or “What do women’s human rights have to do with the race convention?”. Howard Law J 4(3):630Google Scholar
  34. Cusack S, Pusey L (2013) Cedaw and the rights to non-discrimination and equality CEDAW and the rights to non-discrimination and equality. Melb J Int Law 14:54Google Scholar
  35. de Beauvoir S (1989) The second sex. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Disterheft A, Caeiro S, Azeiteiro U M, Leal Filho W (2013). Sustainability science, and education for sustainable development in universities: a way for transition. In: Caeiro S, Leal Filho W, Jabbour C, Azeiteiro U M (eds). Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions: Mapping Trends and Good Practices Around the World. Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dixon M (1990) Internacional law, London.Google Scholar
  38. Ellsberg M, Heise L (2005) Research violence against women: practical guide for researchers and activists, World Health Organization, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, Washington, DC, EUA, p 10Google Scholar
  39. Engle K (1991) International human rights and feminism: when discourses meet. Mich J Int Law 13:517Google Scholar
  40. Esquivel V, Sweetman C (2016) Gender and sustainable development goals. Gend Dev 24(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Evans S (2005) Beyond gender: class, poverty and domestic violence. Aust Soc Work 58(1):36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Facio A, Fries L (1999) Género y Derecho. Colecion contrasena. Estudios de Género, Chile. Serie CassandraGoogle Scholar
  43. Flynn M (2003) Human rights in Australia, treaties, statutes & cases. LexisNexis Butterworths, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  44. Francioni C (1997) Enforcing international human rights in domestic courts. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  45. Fukuda-Parr S (2016) From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gend Dev 24(1):43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Galigan B, Sampford C (eds) (1997) Rethinking human rights. The Federation Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  47. Green M (2001) What we talk about when we talk about indicators: current approaches to human rights measurement. Hum Rights Q 23:1062–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grillo T (1995) Anti-essentialism and intersectionality: tools to dismantle of the master’s house. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 10(1):16–30Google Scholar
  49. Harris DJ (2004) Cases and materials on international law, 6th edn. Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Heim D (2011) Prostitución y Derechos Humanos. CEFD, Cuadernos Eletrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, Alexandria, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Heyns C, Frans V (2002) The impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. Kluwer Law International, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  52. Heyns C, Viljoen F (2002) The impact of the United Nations human rights treaties on the domestic level. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  53. Hilkka P, Vickers J (1990) Making women matter: the role of the United Nations. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Hintjens H (2007) UNIFEM, CEDAW and the Human-Rights-based Approach. Development and Change 39(6):1181–1192. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/21551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holmaat R (2013) The CEDAW: a holistic approach to women’s equality and freedom. In: Hellum A, Aesen H S (eds). Women’s Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and national Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. A statistical overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia, 2006. http://www.humanrights.gov.au/social_justice/statistics/index.html. At 26 June 2019
  57. Iwraw (2005) A resource guide, our rights are not optional. International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  58. Joseph J (1997) A comparative analysis of black and white women, chapter 13. In: Kantor GK, Jasinski JL (eds) Out of the darkness, a contemporary perspectives on family violence, vol 167. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  59. Kantor GK, Jasinski JL, Joseph J (1997) Out of darkness: contemporary perspectives on family violence, women battering, a comparative analysis of black and white women. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  60. Kathree F (1995) Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. S Afr J Hum Rights 11(3):421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kelly L (1999) Indigenous women’s stories speak for themselves: the policing of apprehended violence orders. Indig Law Bull 4(25):5–6Google Scholar
  62. Kinnear K (1997) Women in the Third World: a reference handbook. ABC-CUO, Santa Barbara. Landsberg-Lewis I (ed) Bringing equality home: implementing the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. United Nations Development Fund for Women, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  63. Knop K (2003) Gender and human rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Krull AC, Miller JL (1997) Controlling domestic violence, victim resources and police intervention, chapter 19. In: Kantor GK, Jasinski JL (eds) Out of darkness, contemporary perspective on family violence. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  65. Lacey N (2004) Feminist legal theory and the right of women. In: Knop K (ed) Gender and human rights. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Laing L, Bobic N (2002) Economic costs of domestic violence, Australian Domestic & Family violence. University of New South Wales, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  67. Leach M (2015) Gender, equality and sustainable development: pathway to sustainability series. University of California, BerkleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Leal Filho W (2009) Towards the promotion of education for sustainability. http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re2009/re2009_12eng.pdf. At 26 June 2018
  69. Leal Filho W, Murphy Z (eds) (1996) A sourcebook of environmental education. Parthenon Press, CarnforthGoogle Scholar
  70. Leal Filho W, Salomone M (eds) (2006) Innovative approaches to education for sustainable development. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  71. Leal Filho W, Schleicher K (eds) (1998) Comparing European and National Environmental Education. Waxmann Verlag, Munich/Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Lovell PA (2000) Gender, race and the struggle for social justice in Brazil. Lat Am Perspect 27(115):85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Magar V (2015) Gender, health and the sustainable development goals. Bull World Health Organ 93(11):743. EditorialsGoogle Scholar
  74. Martinez AG (2001) Human rights of women. Wash Univ J Law Policy 5:157–188Google Scholar
  75. Morris A (1987) Women, crime and criminal justice. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  76. Paes FDMR (2011) La Ley de Violencia domestica contra las mujeres en Brasil: La historia de una lucha in America Latina. In: Taya J, Romano L, Aragão P (eds) Reflexiones sobre el Derecho Latino Americano. Editorial Quorum, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  77. Paes FDMR (2019a) A Participação Política das Mulheres e a Desigualdade de Gênero. Agência Patrícia Galvão, 05/06/2017 http://agenciapatriciagalvao.org.br/politica/participacao-politica-das-mulheres-e-desigualdade-de-genero-por-fabiana-dal-mas-rocha-paes/. At 26 June 2019
  78. Paes FDMR (2019b) Estado tem o dever de prevenir e punir a violência obstétrica. Consultor Jurídico, 7/12/2015. Available from https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-dez-07/mp-debate-estado-dever-dever-prevenir-punir-violencia-obstetrica. At 26 June 2019
  79. Paes FDMR (2019c) A Lei Maria da Penha: Experiências e Tendências nestes 10 Anos. Estadão. 3/8/2016. Available from https://politica.estadao.com.br/blogs/fausto-macedo/a-lei-maria-da-penha-experiencias-e-tendencias-nestes-10-anos/. At 26 June 2019
  80. Pimentel S (2009). Superação da cegueira de gênero: mais do que um desafio - um imperativo. Revista Direitos Humanos 2, pp. 27–30Google Scholar
  81. Pimentel S, Pandjiarjian V (2000) Direitos Humanos a partir de uma Perspectiva de Gênero. Procuradoria Geral do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp 233–247Google Scholar
  82. Piovesan F (2006) Direitos Humanos e Justiça Internacional. Ed. Saraiva, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  83. Piovesan F (2008) Direitos Humanos e Direito Constitucional Internacional. Ed. Saraiva, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  84. Piovesan F. Direitos Sociais: “Proteção nos Sistemas Internacional e Regional Interamericano”, Revista Internacional de Direito e Cidadania. Out. 2010/Jan 2011Google Scholar
  85. Piovesan F, Ikawa D (2004) A Violência Doméstica contra a Mulher e a Proteção dos Direitos Humanos. Procuradoria Geral do Estado, Grupo de Trabalho de Direitos Humanos, Direitos Humanos no Cotidiano Jurídico: Centro de Estudos da Procuradoria Geral do Estado, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  86. Pitanguy J (2006) As Mulheres e os Direitos Humanos. In: UNIFEM, O Progresso das Mulheres no Brasil. CEPIA/Ford Foundation, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  87. Ptacek J (1999) Battered women in the courtroom, the power of judicial responses. Northeastern University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  88. Rajagopal B (2003) International law from below: development, social movements, and third world resistance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rasmussen B (2007) An explanatory survey of nightmares, dreams, and sleep patterns in women dealing with relationship violence. Violence Against Women 13(3):314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Santos CM (2005) Womens’s police stations: gender, violence and justice in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Seddon N (1993) Domestic violence in Australia, 2nd edn. The Federation Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  92. Stark E (2003) Race, gender and woman battering. In: Hawkins DF (ed) Violent crime, assessing race & ethnic differences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  93. United Nations Development Programme. Indicators for human rights based approaches to development: a user’s guide. http://www.undp.org/oslocentre/docs06/HRBA%20indicators%20guide.pdf. At 26 June 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of New South Wales (UNSW)SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of Buenos Aires (UBA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Brazil’s Agency for Law Enforcement and Prosecution – Sao Paulo State (MP/SP), Domestic Violence and Family Violence Group (GEVID)Sao PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Pontifical University of Sao Paulo (PUC/SP)Sao PauloBrazil

Section editors and affiliations

  • Andréia Faraoni Freitas Setti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCESAM Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of AveiroAveiroPortugal