Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging

Living Edition
| Editors: Danan Gu, Matthew E. Dupre

Age Group Dissociation

  • David WeissEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_93-1

Definition and Overview

Negative views of aging can have detrimental effect on older adults’ self-concept, cognitive performance, well-being, and health (Levy 2009; Wurm et al. 2017). However, older adults are motivated to counteract negative age stereotypes and engage in self-protective behavior. Age-group dissociation is defined as the “tendency to put psychological distance between oneself and similarly aged people” (see Weiss and Lang 2012, p. 154).

Key Research Findings

There is considerable evidence demonstrating that when confronted with negative age stereotypes, older adults increase psychological distance between themselves and older people. Studies across a variety of countries and cohorts show that older adults often perceive their age peers as being “old” but themselves as much “younger” (Stephan et al. 2015) and consider themselves to be an exception rather than a typical member of older people (Weiss and Lang, 2009; Weiss and Freund 2012). More specifically, experimental studies demonstrate that when negative age stereotypes were activated, older adults tended to disidentify with the group of older adults and reported to feel significantly younger than their chronological age (Weiss and Lang 2012). In addition, another set of studies showed that in the face of negative age stereotypes, older adults subsequently (a) directed their gaze away from photographs of older adults and (b) indicated to feel more similar to middle-aged adults that were shown in photographs (Weiss and Freund, 2012). Recently, research has replicated and extended the effects on age-group dissociation in longitudinal and cross-cultural samples (Hess et al. 2017; Armenta et al. 2018).

For example, these studies show that negative age stereotypes elicit patterns of distancing among adults across different stereotype domains (e.g., health, work) and as a function of transitioning into later adulthood (Kornadt et al. 2016). Age-group dissociation is linked to better well-being, health, and cognitive performance in older adults. Those older adults who report younger subjective ages and disidentify with older people (“low identifiers”) show higher levels of psychological well-being, are more open-minded, and feel that they have more time left in life (Weiss and Lang 2009, 2012; Canada et al. 2013). There is also evidence that age-group dissociation represents a self-protective strategy in coping with negative age stereotypes. For example, studies show that the detrimental impact of negative age stereotypes on self-esteem, well-being, or cognitive performance could be prevented when older adults showed age group dissociation (O’Brien and Hummert 2006; Kang and Chasteen 2009; Weiss et al. 2013; Armenta et al. 2018). However, age-group dissociation could also entail negative consequences as it represents a purely individualistic attempt to repel negative age stereotypes and, thus, may perpetuate ageism and further legitimize and reinforce negative age stereotypes in society.

Future Directions for Research

Future research needs to further address the fundamental psychological role of age-group dissociation in the aging process to shed more light on its antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions. One open question is, when and why older adults internalize (i.e., engage in self-stereotyping and assimilate their self-views and behavior; Levy 2009) or dissociate from (contrast their self-views and behavior) negative age stereotypes. Weiss and Kornadt (2018) recently proposed an integrated model of age Stereotype Internalization and Dissociation (SIDI) that specifies contextual (e.g., stereotype context and structure) and individual (i.e., self-relevance, essentialist beliefs about aging) factors that elicit either age stereotype internalization or dissociation.

Summary

As people grow older, they tend to distance and dissociate themselves from their age (feeling younger than their actual age) and their age peers (disidentifying from older people).

Empirical evidence suggests that this is a response to negative old age stereotypes portraying old age as unfavorable and undesirable. Studies also show that age-group dissociation can mitigate and counteract the detrimental consequences of negative age stereotypes.

Cross-References

References

  1. Armenta BM, Scheibe S, Stroebe K et al (2018) Dynamic, not stable: daily variations in subjective age bias and age group identification predict daily well-being in older workers. Psychol Aging 33:559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Canada B, Stephan Y, Caudroit J, Jaconelli A (2013) Personality and subjective age among older adults: the mediating role of age-group identification. Aging Ment Health 17:1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hess TM, O’Brien EL, Voss P et al (2017) Context influences on the relationship between views of aging and subjective age: the moderating role of culture and domain of functioning. Psychol Aging 32:419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kang SK, Chasteen AL (2009) The moderating role of age-group identification and perceived threat on stereotype threat among older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev 69:201–220.  https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.69.3.cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kornadt AE, Hess TM, Voss P, Rothermund K (2016) Subjective age across the life span: a differentiated, longitudinal approach. J Gerontol B 73:767–777Google Scholar
  6. Levy B (2009) Stereotype embodiment: a psychosocial approach to aging. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:332–336.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. O’Brien LT, Hummert ML (2006) Memory performance of late middle–aged adults: contrasting self–stereotyping and stereotype threat accounts of assimilation to age stereotypes. Soc Cogn 24:338–358.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephan Y, Sutin AR, Terracciano A (2015) Subjective age and personality development: a 10-year study. J Pers 83:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiss D, Freund AM (2012) Still young at heart: negative age-related information motivates distancing from same-aged people. Psychol Aging 27:173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weiss D, Kornadt AE (2018) Age-Stereotype Internalization and Dissociation: Contradictory Processes or Two Sides of the Same Coin? Current Directions in Psychological Science 27:477–483.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418777743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weiss D, Lang FR (2009) Thinking about my generation: adaptive effects of a dual age identity in later adulthood. Psychol Aging 24:729–734.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weiss D, Lang FR (2012) “They” are old but “I” feel younger: age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age. Psychol Aging 27:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weiss D, Sassenberg K, Freund AM (2013) When feeling different pays off: how older adults can counteract negative age-related information. Psychol Aging 28:1140–1146.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wurm S, Diehl M, Kornadt AE et al (2017) How do views on aging affect health outcomes in adulthood and late life? Explanations for an established connection. Dev Rev 46:27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Susanne Wurm
    • 1
  • Anna E. Kornadt
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of PsychogerontologyFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergGermany
  2. 2.Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany