Skip to main content

Investigations: Burglary

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 214 Accesses

Definition

The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines burglary as “the unlawful entry of a structure to commit a felony or theft” (FBI 2017). A structure according to UCR includes “an apartment, barn, house trailer, or houseboat when used as a permanent dwelling, office, railroad car (not automobile), stable, or vessel (i.e. ship)” (FBI 2017). Burglary is subdivided into forcible entry, unlawful entry, and attempted forcible entry (FBI 2017). Further, burglary is separated into two distinct categories: (1) residential and (2) commercial. Notably, individual states may have different definitions, classifications, and criminal penalties. Burglary investigations entail appropriate first responder actions, the establishment of a burglar(s) modus operandi (MO), knowledge of property fencing operations, and subsequent examinations of forensic evidence for successful investigative apprehension.

Introduction

In 2017, the UCR estimates that 1,401,840 burglaries have occurred with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bennett, T., & Wright, R. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Hampshire: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W. (2006). Co-offending and the choice of target areas in burglary. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3, 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Luykx, F. (2003). Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 41(3), 981–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, K. R., Kuhns, J., & Lee, S. (2012). Understanding decisions to burglarize from the offender’s perspective. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology. Retrieved December 1, 2018, from http://airef.org/research/BurglarSurveyStudyFinalReport.pdf

  • Bouhana, N., Johnson, S. D., & Porter, M. (2016). Consistency and specificity in burglars who commit prolific residential burglary: Testing the core assumptions underpinning behavioural crime linkage. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, S. G. (2018). Criminal investigation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G. (2005). Commercial burglary: What offenders say. In Crime at work (pp. 29–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A., & Boggess, L. (2016). Relative difference and burglary location: Can ecological characteristics of a burglar’s home neighborhood predict offense location? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(6), 872–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2003). Burglary of retail establishments. Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Retrieved December 1, 2018, from https://popcenter.asu.edu/content/burglary-retail-establishments.

  • Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44, 431–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1997). Solving residential burglary (Crime detection and prevention series, paper no. 7). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, P. F., Olson, J. N., & Avary, D.’. A. W. (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary (Vol. 8). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi, M., Nelson, E. J., Vaughn, M. G., Boutwell, B. B., & Salas-Wright, C. P. (2018). An epidemiological study of burglary offenders: Trends and predictors of self-reported arrests for burglary in the United States, 2002–2013. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(4), 1107–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D., & Lambert, S. (2000). Statistical approaches to offender profiling. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Profiling property crimes (pp. 233–273). Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016). Uniform crime reporting program data: Property stolen and recovered, United States, 2016. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018-07-19. Retrieved December 1, 2018, from https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37063.v1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2017). Uniform crime report: Crime in the United States, 2017. Retrieved December 1, 2018, from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/burglary

  • Felson, M., & Boba, R. L. (2010). Crime and everyday life. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante, A., & Clare, J. (2006). “Known” burglars and the stolen goods market in western Australia (research report). Perth: Office of Crime Prevention, Western Australian Department of Premier and Cabinet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. H., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Creating burglary profiles using latent class analysis: A new approach to offender profiling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1582–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwill, A. M., & Alison, L. J. (2006). The development of a filter model for prioritising suspects in burglary offences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(4), 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, S., Rengert, G. F., & Shachmurove, Y. (2001). Target search of burglars: A revised economic model. Papers in Regional Science, 80(2), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, C., & Francis, B. (2014). The long term recidivism risk of young sexual offenders in England and Wales – Enduring risk or redemption? Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, A., & Copes, H. (2006). Opportunities and decisions: Interactional dynamics in robbery and burglary groups. Criminology, 39, 737–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D. (2008). Repeat burglary victimisation: A tale of two theories. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4(3), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruissink, M. (1996). Commercial burglary: The offender’s perspective. Security Journal, 3(7), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, L., & Truman, J. (2015). Criminal victimization, 2014. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. (2013). Burglary. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirlees-Black, C., & Ross, A. (1995). Crime against retail and manufacturing premises: Findings from the 1994 commercial victimization survey. Home Office research study, no. 146. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, C., & Meenaghan, A. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 935–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2000). Criminal investigation: A method of reconstructing the past. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E., Holmes, A., & Hollins, C. (2002). Investigating burglars’ decisions: Factors influencing target choice, method of entry, reason for offending, repeat victimisation of a property and victim awareness. Security Journal, 15, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G., & Wasilchick, J. (2000). Suburban burglary: A tale of two suburbs (2nd ed.). Springfield: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, K. (2000). Geographic profiling. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A., Kuhns, J., & Blevins, K. (2017). Exploring and understanding differences between deliberate and impulsive male and female burglars. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1547–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N., & Honaker, D. (1992). The socially bounded decision making of persistent property offenders. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(4), 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snook, B. (2004). Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Harris, C. T., & Painter-Davis, N. (2015). Gender and arrests for larceny, fraud, forgery, and embezzlement: Conventional or occupational property crime offenders? Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (1980). Break-ins: Burglary from private houses. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisel, D. L. (2004). Burglary of single-family houses (Problem-oriented guides for police, problem-specific guide series, no. 18). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, E. (1996). Commercial burglars in the Netherlands: Reasoning decision makers. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 1(3), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., & Decker, S. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., Logie, R. H., & Decker, S. H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Brandl, S. G. (2018). Criminal investigation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. (2013). Burglary. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebin, M. (Ed.). (2011). About criminals: A view of the offenders’ world. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Panter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Panter, H. (2019). Investigations: Burglary. In: Shapiro, L., Maras, MH. (eds) Encyclopedia of Security and Emergency Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_166-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_166-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69891-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69891-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics