Skip to main content

Delimitation and Coastline Concavity in International Law

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Territorial Rights
  • 6 Accesses

Definitions

Concavity in coastlines refers to an inward curvature, as in the case of a bay, gulf, or bight. Prominent examples include the Bay of Bengal, the Gulf of Guinea, or the Bay of Biscay, as opposed to convexity, like in the case of a landmass protruding into the sea, like in the case of North-West Africa’s Atlantic coast between Ghana and Morocco, or South America’s Pacific coast between Colombia and Peru.

Equity is a concept that can be traced back to Roman Law (Francioni 2020) and that entered international law via English law (although it has long been contrasted with law in the narrow sense of the term). The term, which is notoriously vague (see Francioni 2020), describes an attempt to reach a fair result, even if doing so necessitates going beyond the strict confines of law. Equity can play a role in international law due to the ability of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to make decisions ex aequo et bono. This capacity, available under Article 38 (2) of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agreement between Finland and Sweden concerning Transboundary Rivers (2013). https://www.fsgk.se/Finnish-Swedish-Transboundary-Rivers-Agreement-2009.pdf

  • Bonchuck MO (2014) The International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) judgment over the Bakassi Peninsula: a model in the resolution of African boundary disputes. LWATI J Contemp Res 11(4):131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill RR, Lowe AV (1999) The law of the sea. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins E Jr, Rogoff MA (1982) The international law of maritime boundary delimitation. Maine Law Rev 34:1–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Delabie L (2019) The role of equity, equitable principles, and the equitable solution in maritime delimitation. In: Oude Elferink AG, Henriksen T, Busch SV (eds) Maritime boundary delimitation: the caw law – is it consistent and predictable? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 145–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MD (2017) Maritime boundary delimitation. In: Rothwell DR, Oude Elferink AG, Scott KN, Stephens T (eds) The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 254–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans M (2019) Relevant circumstances. In: Oude Elferink AG, Henriksen T, Busch SV (eds) Maritime boundary delimitation: the caw law – is it consistent and predictable? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 222–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni F (2020) Equity in international law. In: Peters A, Wolfrum R (eds) Max Planck encyclopedia of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1399#:~:text=In%20its%20most%20general%20meaning,Justice%20(ICJ)%20under%20Art

  • International Court of Justice (1969) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), Judgment of 20 February 1969, I.C.J. Reports 1969, 3

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice (2002) Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Judgment of 10 October 2002, I.C.J. Reports 2002, 303

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner S, Mazzullo N, Akonwi Nebasifu A, Lesser P, Tulppo P, Kyllönen K-M, Heinrich K (2022) Towards a holistic cross-border environmental governance in the European Arctic. J Territ Marit Stud 9:31–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/JTMS.9.2.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova T, Ringbom H, Kleemola-Juntunen P, Kirchner S (2019) The Baltic Sea and the law of the sea – Finnish perspectives. Lit Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Lando M (2020) Maritime delimitation as a judicial process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques Antunes N, Becker-Weinberg V (2019) Entitlement to maritime zones and their delimitation. In: Oude Elferink AG, Henriksen T, Busch SV (eds) Maritime boundary delimitation: the caw law – is it consistent and predictable? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute

  • Swan GS (1977) That Gulf of main dispute: Canada and the United States delimit the continental shelf. Nat Resour Lawyer 10:405–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y (2019a) The disproportionality test in the law of maritime delimitation. In: Oude Elferink AG, Henriksen T, Busch SV (eds) Maritime boundary delimitation: the caw law – is it consistent and predictable? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y (2019b) The international law of the sea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982) Adopted 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994. 1833 United Nations Treaty Series 3. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf

  • Vidas D (2011) The UN convention on the law of the sea, the European Union, and the rule of law: what is going on in the Adriatic Sea? In: Silverburg SR (ed) International law – contemporary issues and future developments. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 318–361

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Kirchner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kirchner, S. (2023). Delimitation and Coastline Concavity in International Law. In: Gray, K.W. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Territorial Rights. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_93-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_93-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68846-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68846-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics