Global Encyclopedia of Territorial Rights

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael Kocsis

Dubai/Sharjah Boundary Arbitration of 1981

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_609-1
  • 18 Downloads

Definitions

The Dubai v. Sharjah Boundary Arbitration concerned a dispute between two federated states of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), over the location of their land and maritime boundaries. Before the UAE was established in 1971, Dubai and Sharjah were among several Trucial states (Emirates) under Great Britain from 1891 to 1971. Great Britain, through its political agents, attempted to determine the boundaries between the states in the 1950s. Nevertheless, Dubai and Sharjah’s conflict continued until they submitted their dispute to an Arbitral Tribunal (Tribunal) on November 30, 1976. The Tribunal issued a ruling on October 19, 1981. The Tribunal derived its reasoning by applying international law in the context of the country’s history and geography and by determining how evidence of sovereignty would be affected by the areas’ social and political organization (Bowett 1995, 110). The arbitration of boundary disputes was not common within the region; moreover, neither party had...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Al-Qasimi SM (ed) (1988) The myth of Arab piracy in the Gulf. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowett DW (1995) The Dubai/Sharjah boundary arbitration of 1981. Brit Yearb Int Law 65:103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. British Foreign Office: Cartographic & Map Section (1983) Map of the Sharjah-Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE): Arbitration Award, FCO 18/448Google Scholar
  4. Cottier T (2015) Equitable principles of maritime delimitation: the quest for distributive justice in international law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubai v. Sharjah Border Arbitration, Award (1981) 91 ILR 543Google Scholar
  6. Evans MD (2001) The maritime delimitation between Eritrea and Yemen. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fietta S, Cleverly R (2016) Part B commentary on judgments and awards in maritime boundary delimitation disputes, 4 Dubai-Sharjah Border Arbitration (Award of the ad hoc ‘Court of Arbitration’, 19 October 1981). In: A practitioner’s guide to maritime boundary delimitation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199657476.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heard-Bey F (2008) From tribe to state: the transformation of the political structure in five states of the GCC – vol. 2. Crissma working paper, No. 15, 2008Google Scholar
  9. International Court of Justice (1969) North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands, Judgment). ICJ Reports 1969, p. 3Google Scholar
  10. Kaikobad KH (2007) Interpretation and revision of international boundary decisions. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kopela S (2010) International court of justice. Int J Marine Coastal Law 25:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lew JDM, Mistelis LA, Kröl S (2003) Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Permanent Court of International Justice (1933) Legal status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway, Judgment). PCIJ Rep Series A/B No. 53Google Scholar
  14. Prescott V, Schofield C (2005) The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. United Nations (1949) Reports of International Arbitral Awards, vol. II: Island of Palmas Award (Netherlands, USA). Codification Division of the United Nations Office of Legal AffairsGoogle Scholar
  16. United Nations (1981) Reports of international arbitral awards, vol. XVIII: Delimitation in the continental shelf between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the French Republic (UK, France). Codification Division of the United Nations Office of Legal AffairsGoogle Scholar
  17. Villager ME (2009) Commentary on the Vienna convention on the law of treaties. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington College of LawWashingtonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kevin W. Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada