Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Governance and Corporate Legitimacy: The Role of Boards

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

The field of corporate governance can to a large extent be traced back the aftermath of the Great Depression 1929. The problem which led to the crash of the stock market was described as a division between control and ownership. The problem was described as managerialism. The thesis of managerialism inspired agency theory which has been synonymous with corporate governance theory. The theory focuses on the shareholder perspective and the importance of maximizing profits. Although corporate legitimacy has become a more important concept within institutional theory, it has had limited influence on the corporate governance discourse. That is, however, likely to change as the importance of the stakeholder perspective is growing. To align corporate governance with stakeholder perspective and strive for corporate legitimacy will have profound effects on the role of boards and corporate governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera R, Filatotchev I, Jackson G, Gospel H (2008) An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organ Sci 19:475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M (2001) Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1964) Integrating the individual and the corporation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin DB, Markman G, Gomez-Mejia LR (2000) Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? Acad Manag J 43:1118–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball R, Robin A, Wu JS (2003) Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. J Account Econ 36:235–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad Manag J 47:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB, Ouchi W (eds) (1986) Organizational economics. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G, Filatotchev I, Aguilera R (2014) Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: an institutional perspective. Acad Manag J 57:301–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle AA, Means GG (1932/1968) The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair MM (1995) Ownership and control: rethinking corporate governance for the twenty first century. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøhren Ø, Ødegaard BA (2003) Governance and performance revisited. In: Ali P, Gregouriu (eds) International corporate governance after Sarbanes-Oxley, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett PO (2000) The management systems approach: content characteristics of an emerging model for managing organisations toward performance excellence. Doctorate thesis, Henley Management College and Brunel University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce A, Buck T, Main BGM (2005) Top executive remuneration: a view from Europe. J Manag Stud 42:1493–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budnitz ME (1990) Chapter 11 Business reorganizations and shareholder meetings: will the meeting please come to order, or should the meeting be cancelled altogether? George Wash Law Rev 58:1214–1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffett M, Clarke D (2006) The Tao of Warren Buffett. Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury A (1992) The financial aspects of corporate governance. Committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. Gee & Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury A (2002) Corporate governance and chairmanship – a personal view. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon D (1998) Corporate governance for Belgian listed companies. Belgian Commission for Corporate Governance, Brussels Stock Exchange and the Banking and Finance Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1977) The visible hand – the managerial revolution in American business. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvas JA, Powell WW (2006) Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Res Organ Behav 27:315–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL (1998) Meta-analytical reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 19:269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Daily CM, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 15(3):674–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev 22(1):20–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse D, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Hardy C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 49–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Demb A, Neubauer FF (1992) The corporate board. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (1990) The ethereal hand: organizational economics and management theory. Acad Manag Rev 15:369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L, Davis JH (1994) Boards and company performance: research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corp Gov 2:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behaviour. Pac Sociol Rev 18:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulewicz V, Herbert P (1997) Current practice in the boards of UK listed companies. Henley Management College & Towers Perrin, Henley-on-Thames

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesley C, Lenox M (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strateg Manag J 27:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio M, Lang LHP (2002) The ultimate ownership in Western European corporations. J Financ Econ 63(3):365–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Jensen M (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev I, Nakajima C (2014) Corporate governance, responsible managerial behaviour, and corporate social responsibility: organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Acad Manag Perspect 28(3):289–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev I, Wright M (eds) (2005) Corporate governance life cycle. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick D (1996) Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organisations. West, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (2004) Overcoming apartheid: can truth reconcile a divided nation? Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies J (1992) Boardroom renaissance. McGraw-Hill Ryerson and The National Centre for Management Research and Development, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia LR, Wiseman RM (2007) Does agency theory have universal relevance? A reply to Lubatkin, Lane, Collin, and Very. J Organ Behav 28:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad Manag J 45:58–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif A (2006) Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilb M (2006) New corporate governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hung H (1998) A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corp Gov 6(2):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram P, Simons T (1995) Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Acad Manag J 38(5):1466–1482

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J Int Bus Stud 43:834–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm, managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen LN, Lindegaard J, Schmidt W, Ovllsen M (2001) Norby-udvalgets rapport om Corporate Governance i Danmark. Corporate Governance, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL, Dayly CM, Ellstrand AE (1996) Boards of directors: a review and research agenda. J Manag 22:409–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Silanes FL, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Financ 54(2):1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan LL, Heracleous L (2010) Rethinking agency theory: view from law. Acad Manag Rev 35:294–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner RJ (1970) Management control and the large corporation. Dunellen, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1959) The financing of corporations. In: Mason ES (ed) The corporation in modern society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 166–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch JW, Carter CB (2004) Back to the drawing board. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch JW, MacIver E (1989) Pawns or potentates: the reality of America’s corporate boards. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin M (2007) One more time: what is a realistic theory of corporate governance? J Organ Behav 28:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacAvoy PW, Millstein IM (2003) The recurrent crisis in corporate governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mace ML (1971) Directors: myth and reality. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz AC, Shenhar AJ, Reilly RR (2003) Beyond the balanced scorecard: refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Plan 36:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Sutton RI (1997) Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organ Sci 8(6):698–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell JJ, Servaes H (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J Financ Econ 27:595–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Scott WR (1983) Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In: Meyer JW, Scott WR (eds) Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi MS (2004) Berle and Means revisited: the governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory Soc 33(5):579–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsen RJ, Chiu JS, Cooley DE (1968) The effect of separation of ownership and control on the performance of the large firm. Q J Econ 82:435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima C (2012) Shareholder primacy revisited. Company Lawyer 33:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima C, Sheffield E (2002) Conflicts of interest and Chinese walls. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien J (2005) Governing the corporation: regulation and corporate governance in an age of scandal and global markets. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien J (2006) The politics of symbolism: Sarbanes-Oxley in context. In: Ali PU, Gregoriou GN (eds) International corporate governance after Sarbanes-Oxley. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manag Rev 16:145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM, McNulty T (1998) Sources and uses of power in the boardroom. Eur J Work Organ Psy 7:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad Manag J 46:631–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Kramer MR (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84:78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin JD, Bondy K (2013) Putting the good back in good corporate governance: the presence and problems of double-layered agency theory. Corp Gov 21:420–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam V, Venkatraman N (1988) Excellence, planning, and performance. Interfaces 18(3):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: contests, credentialing and legitimation in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. Strateg Manag J 15:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Baumann-Pauly D, Schneider A (2013) Democratizing corporate governance: compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Bus Soc 52:473–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1957) Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns LB (1986) Capital market effects on external control of corporations. Theory Soc 15:47–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles P, Taylor B (2001) Boards at work – how directors view their roles and responsibilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm Sci Q 50:35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GM, Walker HA, Zelditch M (1986) Legitimacy and collective action. Soc Forces 65:378–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert PS, Zucher LG (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organisations; the diffusion of civil service reforms 1880–1935. Adm Sci Q 23:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricker RI (2000) Ed. Introduction. In: Corporate governance. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR (2006) Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annu Rev Psychol 57:375–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulhøi JP (2007) Revisiting the principal-agent theory of agency: comments on the firm-level and cross-national embeddedness theses. J Organ Behav 28:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N, Ramanujam V (1986) Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Acad Manag Rev 11:801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voegtlin C, Patzer M, Scherer AG (2012) Responsible leadership in global business: a new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. J Bus Ethics 105:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman DA, Galvin BM (2008) Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organ Dyn 37:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) In: Roth G, Wittich C (eds) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22:233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1984) Corporate governance. Yale Law J 93:1197–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Pearce JA (1989) Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model. J Manag 15(2):291–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin M (1974) Corporate ownership and control: the large corporation and the capitalist class. Am J Sociol 79:1073–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Eythor Ivar Jonsson

Authors
  1. Eythor Ivar Jonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eythor Ivar Jonsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jonsson, E.I. (2020). Corporate Governance and Corporate Legitimacy: The Role of Boards. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_94-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_94-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation