Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legitimacy in Co-creating Governance Networks

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The rise of governance networks through which public and private actors co-create public value outcomes has two important consequences for the legitimacy of private businesses. On the one hand, private companies participating in governance networks and public value co-creation get to influence political and administrative decisions in legitimate way. On the other hand, participation in public value co-creation means that private businesses are increasingly expected to legitimize their own, interest-based actions in relation to society’s collective goals in order to gain access to governance networks and public–private collaboration. This chapter charts the development of new forms of interactive governance and presents an overview of the forms of networked governance in which private companies typically participate. It addresses the question of legitimacy at the levels of the network and the individual company, respectively, and discusses some of the strategies for constructing and managing the internal and external legitimacy of network actors. Finally, it is sketching out some future research avenues that may deepen our understanding of the legitimacy of private business participation in public governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich HE (1979) Organizations and environments. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford J (2014) The multiple facets of co-production: building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Manag Rev 16(3):299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2018) Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. J Public Adm Res Theory 28(1):16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Torfing J (eds) (2014) Public innovation through collaboration and design. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselmi M (2018) Populism: an introduction. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T, Panke D (2007) Network governance: effective and legitimate? In: Sørensen E, Torfing J (eds) Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 153–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird T (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: user and community co-production of public services. Public Adm Rev 67(5):846–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird T, Löffler E (2012) From engagement to co-production: how users and communities contribute to public services. In: Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Verschuere B (eds) New Public Governance: the third sector and co-production. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 35–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird T, Löffler E (2018) Assessing the effect of co-production. In: Brandsen T, Steen T, Verschuere B (eds) Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M, Huntington SP, Watanuki J (1975) The crisis of democracy. The New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugbjerg C, Fawcett P (2017) Metagovernance, network structure, and legitimacy: developing a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. Adm Soc 49(9):1223–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doberstein C, Millar H (2014) Balancing a house of cards: throughput legitimacy in Canadian governance networks. Can J Polit Sci 47(2):259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogsgaard MK, de Jongh M (eds) (2018) Ledelse og samskabelse i den offentlige sektor. Dansk Psykologisk Forlag, Copenhagen, pp 30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjaltema J, Biesbroek R, Termeer K (2019) From government to governance… to meta-governance: a systematic literature review. Public Manag Rev. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697

  • Gouillart F (2014) The race to implement co-creation of value with stakeholders: five approaches to competitive advantage. Strateg Leadersh 42(1):2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote JR, Gbikpi B (eds) (2002) Participatory governance. Leske and Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks CM (2009) The democratic soup: mixed meanings of political representation in governance networks. Governance 22(4):689–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1991) A public administration for all seasons? Public Adm 69(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (2007) Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance 20(1):127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C, Dixon R (2015) A government that worked better and cost less? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C, Peters G (2004) The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox? J Public Adm Res Theory 14(3):267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iusmen I, Boswell J (2017) The dilemmas of pursuing “throughput legitimacy” through participatory mechanisms. West Eur Polit 40(2):59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B (2002) The future of the capitalist state. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B (2011) Metagovernance. In: Bevir M (ed) The Sage handbook of governance. Sage, London, pp 106–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keast R, Brown K, Mandell M (2007) Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meanings and strategies. Int Public Manag J 10(1):9–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis P, Schneider V (1991) Policy networks and policy analysis: scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In: Marin B, Mayntz R (eds) Policy networks. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt-am-Main, pp 25–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert WJM, Klijn E-H, Koppenjan JFM (1997) Managing complex networks. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (2003) Governing as governance. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan J, Klijn E-H (2004) Managing uncertainties in networks. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau E, Mouffe C (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater C, Cottam H (2007) The user-generated state: public services 2.0. In: Diamond P (ed) Public matters: the renewal of the public realm. Methuen, London, pp 95–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1988 [1689]) Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh D, Rhodes RAW (eds) (1992) Policy networks in British government. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar H (2013) Comparing accountability relationships between governments and non-state actors in Canadian and European international development policy. Can Public Adm 56(2):252–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabatchi T, Sancino A, Sicilia M (2017) Varieties of participation in public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Adm Rev 77(5):766–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP (2006) The New Public Governance? Public Manag Rev 8(3):377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP (ed) (2010) The New Public Governance? Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1996) Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev 24(6):1073–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Verschuere B (eds) (2012) New Public Governance, the third sector, and co-production. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (1994) Dismantling the welfare state? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW (1991) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, DiMaggio P (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2002) The co-creation connection. Strategy Bus 27:50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding governance. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf FW (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2011) The new role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. J Manag Stud 48(4):899–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt VA (2013) Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and “throughput”. Polit Stud 61(1):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen E, Torfing J (eds) (2007) Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen E, Torfing J (2009) Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Adm 87(2):234–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen E, Triantafillou P (eds) (2009) The politics of self-governance. Ashgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek J (2018) The limits of proceduralism: critical remarks on the rise of “throughput legitimacy”. Public Adm 97(4):784–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker G (2019) Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? Policy Polit 47(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J (1999) New theories of discourse. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J (2009) Offentlig ledelse efter kommunalreformen. DJØF Publishers, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J (2016) Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Triantafillou P (2013) What’s in a name? Grasping New Public Governance as a political-administrative system. Int Rev Public Adm 18(2):9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Peters BG, Pierre J, Sørensen E (2012) Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Sørensen E, Røiseland A (2019) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Adm Soc 51(5):795–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Meerkerk I, Edelenbos J, Klijn E-H (2015) Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 33(4):746–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg W, Bekkers V, Tummers L (2013) Co-creation and co-production in social innovation: a systematic review and future research agenda. Paper presented at the EGPA Conference, Edinburgh, September 11–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Andreas Hagedorn Krogh & Jacob Torfing

Authors
  1. Andreas Hagedorn Krogh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob Torfing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Torfing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Krogh, A.H., Torfing, J. (2020). Legitimacy in Co-creating Governance Networks. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_89-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_89-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation