Skip to main content

Finance, Sustainability, and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

Abstract

The world faces an increasing number of complex and mutually influential challenges that we have never experienced and cannot cope with our experience so far. The new economic age is an era of unparalleled resources and technological progress, but is also defined as the age of mistrust for a great number of people. This has led to increased requirement to new methods, new business models, and new business strategies to respond to this insecurity. Therefore institutions need to manage their risks in the long run in order to survive. Ethical and responsible behaviors, intellectual capacities, and corporate cultures are crucial for sustainable performance in this turbulent period. It is expected that the institutions that are able to establish the system of values can manage effective information sharing and communication with their stakeholders.

Sustainability has become one of the most significant topics within the lexicon of corporate endeavor in the light of these developments. While the concept of sustainability is in many instances indicated as fundamental in corporate activity, its definition is still problematic, and its use is so varied. Therefore the concept of sustainability and its dimensions are defined in the business setting at first in this chapter. Then the theoretical framework is also presented in this chapter to clarify why companies disclose their sustainable performance information. Moreover the financial consequences of sustainability implementations of companies are discussed in this chapter. Sustainability should be considered as not solely a process which must recognize the decision being made in the operational activity but also the distributional decisions which are made. Only then, a company can be considered to be sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman RW (1975) The social challenge to business. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G (2015a) Causality and interaction: sustainable markets and sustainable business. In: Sustainable markets for sustainable business: global perspective for business and financial markets. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G (2015b) What are the key aspects and challenges for sustainability? In: Sustainable markets for sustainable business: global perspective for business and financial markets. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2007a) Is the global economy sustainable? In: Barber S (ed) The geopolitics of the city. Forum Press, London, pp 165–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2007b) Sustainable corporate social responsibility and the value chain. In: Zain MM, Crowther D (eds) New perspectives on corporate social responsibility. MARA University Press, Kuala Lumpar, pp 119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2007c) What level of trust is needed for sustainability? Soc Responsib J 3(3):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2008) Governance and sustainability: an investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Manag Decis 46(3):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2009a) The durable corporation: strategies for sustainable development. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2009b) Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity? J Bus Ethics 27:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Ingley C (2017) Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good, Finance, governance and sustainability: challenges to theory and practice, Routledge book series. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Williams P (2017) Agency theory: explaining or creating problems? Good governance and ethical behaviour for sustainable business. In: Corporate behavior and sustainability: doing well by being good. Finance, governance and sustainability: challenges to theory and practice, Routledge, Gower Book Series, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Tezcan N, Furtuna O, Kazak E (2017) Corporate sustainability measurement based on entropy weight and TOPSIS: a Turkish Banking Case Study. Meditari Account Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2016-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Tezcan N, Furtuna O (2018a) Comprehensive evaluation of the financial performance for intermediary institutions based on multi-criteria decision making method. J Cap Mark Stud 2(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Tezcan N, Furtuna O (2018b) Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: evidence from an emerging market banking sector. J Clean Prod 185:600. https://doi.org/10.1016/jclepro.2018.01.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Tezcan N, Furtuna O (2018c) The value relevance of banking sector multidimensional corporate sustainability performance. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25:1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson G (2000) Measuring corporate sustainability. J Environ Plan Manag 43(2):235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes R (1973) Mythologies (trans: Lavers A). HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G, Feiner A, Viehs M (2015) From the stockholder to the stakeholder: how sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Oxford University and Arabesque Asset Management Company. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetyko DF (1975) The company social audit. Manag Account 56(10):645–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Pierce J, Dodd RH (2000) Environmentalism and the new logic of business. How firms can be profitable and leave our children a living planet. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker A (1998) Measuring up sustainability. Futures 30(4):367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Owen D, Adams C (1996) Accounting and accountability: changes and challenges in corporate and social reporting. Prentice-Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie JE, Parker LD (1989) Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Account Bus Res 9(76):343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL, Milstein MB (2003) Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Exec 17(2):56–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch PM (1975) Organizational effectiveness and the institutional environment. Adm Sci Q 20(3):327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein TA (1977) Social costs and benefits of business. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2017) Corporate of Corporate Responsibility reporting. KPMG https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf

  • Lovelock JE (1979) Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden C (2000) The new corporate citizenship of big business: part of the solution to sustainability. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald D, Puxty AG (1979) An inducement – contribution approach to corporate financial reporting. Acc Org Soc 4(1/2):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocean Tomo LLC (2015) Annual study of intangible asset market value. Ocean Tomo, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G (1970) Collected essays, journalism and letters, vol 4. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan J (1998) Sustainability Rulers: Measuring Corporate Environmental and Social Performance. Sustainable Enterprise Perspectives Series, World Resources Institue, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein DB (1992) Bridging the gap between green accounting and black ink. Acc Organ Soc 17(5):501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir E (1949) The unconscious patterning of behaviour in society. In: Mendelbaum DG (ed) Selected writings of Edward Sapir. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomons D (1974) Corporate social performance: a new dimension in accounting reports? In: Edey H, Yamey BS (eds) Debits, credits, finance and profits. Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp 131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH (2004) Reconciling sustainability and growth: criteria, indicators, policy. Sustain Dev 12:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg E (1997) The defects of stakeholder theory. Corp Gov 6(3):151–163

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future (The Brundtland report). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF (2019) Global risks report. WEF, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guler Aras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aras, G. (2019). Finance, Sustainability, and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_77-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_77-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics