Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deficit of Legitimacy in Startups: Main Consequences and Strategic Solutions

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and discuss consequences and solutions related to the phenomenon of “liability of newness” among startups causing a deficit of legitimacy among new ventures. In the literature, the “liability of newness” or lack of legitimacy is related to three legitimation mechanisms: identity, associative, and organizational mechanisms. They account each for various consequences of a deficit of legitimacy among startups. In the literature on evolutionary theories, there are different opinions about how new ventures can solve this lack of legitimacy – the institutional position claims that new venture enhances their legitimation by activities that make them more reliable and accountable. The social relationship position argues that developing relationships with stakeholders represent a better way to increase the legitimacy of new ventures – lastly, the Schumpeterian position claims that new venture survivals depend on obtaining control over and recombining resources in a way superior to that of established organizations. With the aim of investigating the identified consequences of the legitimation mechanisms and strategic solutions discussed in the literature empirically, this study builds on findings from a survey conducted in late 2016 among 300 startups. All startups were part of a growth-enhancing incubation program in the region of Zealand, Denmark, and the data collected and methodology used in this survey form the background for analyzing evidence supporting the various position in the literature. The findings show that, in the short run, the entrepreneurs can compensate their deficit of legitimacy by relying on local networks and resources close to them, but in the longer term, they need to solve the lack of organizational legitimacy vis-à-vis established organizations and their surroundings to survive and achieve the necessary economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich H, Fiol H (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad Manag Rev 19(4):645–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich H, Wiedenmayer G (1993) From traits to rates: an ecological perspective on organizational founding. Adv Entrep Firm Emerg Growth 1:145–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich H, Zimmer C (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks, the art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1974) The limits of organization. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET 6 for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard. Hentet på adressen http://www.analytictech.com/Ucinet_Guide.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns P (2013) Corporate entrepreneurship – innovation and strategy in large organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for VækstAnalyse (2015) VækstIndeks 2015 – Tema: Eksport i de sjællandske SMV’er. http://vaekstanalyse.dk/file/566581/vaekstindeks_2015.pdf

  • Choi YR, Shepherd DA (2005) Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. J Manag 31:573–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BD, Dean TJ (2005) Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Acad Manag Rev 26:683–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC (1995) Entrepreneurial information search. J Bus Ventur 10(2):107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowi (2016) Vækstfremmende inkubationsforløb for SMVér – Slutevaluering, rapport til Regiona Sjælland og Den Europæiske Socialfund. Cowi, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmar F, Shane S (2004) Legitimating first: organizing activities and survival of new ventures. J Bus Ventur 19:385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhvervsfremmestyrelsen (2017) Regional udvikling, Iværksætteri og vækstvirksomheder, tabellen ERSTS206. Hentet på adressen http://regionalt.statistikbank.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1680

  • Fernald LW Jr, Solomon GT, Tarabishy A (2005) A new paradigm: entrepreneurial leadership. South Bus Rev 30(2):1–10. Spring, Statesboro: Georgia Southern University

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher G, Kuratko DF, Bloodgood JM, Hornsby J (2017) Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. J Bus Ventur 32:52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1983) The liability of newness: age dependency in organizational death rates. Am Sociol Rev 48(5):692–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner WB (1988) Who is the entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Am J Small Bus 12(4):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitsham M, Pegg M, Culpin V (2011) The shifting landscape of global challenge in the 21st century: what this means for what business want from tomorrow’s leaders, and the implication for management learning. Bus Leadersh Rev 8(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, MacMillan IC, Surie G (2004) Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. J Bus Ventur 19(2):56–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1983) Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen JL, Koenig HF (2002) The effect of social networks on resource access and business start-ups. Eur Plan Stud 10(8):1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson B (1988) Business formation – a network approach. Scand J Manag 4(3/4):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annu Rev Sociol 32:53–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1983) The change masters: innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck GM, Webb JW, Sutter CJ, Bailey AV (2015) The double-edge sword of legitimacy in base-of-the-pyramid markets. J Bus Ventur 30:436–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83:340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (2009) Managing. Prentice Hall, Harlow/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller JK (2018) Becoming an entrepreneurial leader – a matter of education in theory and practice, paper. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, ACPI, UK, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller JK, Grünbaum NN (2017) Vækstfremmende inkubationsforløb og uformelle netværk – en undersøgelse af iværksættere i region Sjælland og deres brug af uformelle netværk. Roskilde, Roskilde Universitet (upubliceret)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin JA (1997) A model of work-based learning. Organ Sci 8(6):563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova VP, Petkova AP, Kotha S (2007) Standing out: how new firms in emerging markets build reputation. Strateg Organ 5:31–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels C (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Adm Sci Q 44:315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am Sociol Rev 51:273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornikowski ET, Newbert SL (2007) Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: a legitimacy perspective. J Bus Ventur 22:311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Überbacher F (2014) Legitimation of new ventures: a review and research programme. J Manag Stud 51(4):667–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber K, Dacin MT (2011) The culture construction of organizational life: introduction to the special issue. Organ Sci 22:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaire M (2010) Young and No Money? Never Mind: The Material Impact of Social Resources on New Venture Growth. Organization Science 21(1):168–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1985) Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3):26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich H (1989) In Pursuit of Evidence: Strategies for Locating New Businesses, Journal of Business Venturing, January 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll GR, Hanan MT (2000) Why corporate demography matters: Policy implications of organizational diversity, California Management Review, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC, Folta TB, Woo C (1995) Entrepreneurial information search. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2):107–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns P (2005) Corporate entrepreneurship: building an entrepreneurial organisation, first edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MP et al (2000) The Relationship between Environmental Dynamism and Small Firm Structure, Strategy, and Performance, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, The Marketing and Entrepreneurship Interface, Spring, 2000, pp. 63–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Science and Business, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jørn Kjølseth Møller

Authors
  1. Jørn Kjølseth Møller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jørn Kjølseth Møller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Møller, J.K. (2020). Deficit of Legitimacy in Startups: Main Consequences and Strategic Solutions. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_59-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_59-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation