Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anthropological Underpinnings of Business Ethics and Work Ethics in Relation to Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

There is a strong human factor in business. Therefore, it is an important task for anyone who deals with economics – scientists as well as business people – to think about questions of anthropology: what are the important traits of human character and decision-making and how do I account for them in my own economic theory or business model? The chapter presents the understanding of human being and acting that is typical for neoclassical economics, the so-called homo economicus model. It then turns to various criticisms of that model and contends that there are two other significant anthropological models in current theory of economics: the other-regarding, moral person with specific interests in justice, solidarity, and integrity, and the “intuitive agent” of behavioral economics. It is argued that even though it has been tried to deduce norms and rules of business legitimacy directly from anthropological findings, anthropology cannot replace ethics. Still, observations with regard to human motivation and decision-making are an indispensable underpinning of any economic theory and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annas J (1993) The morality of happiness. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD (2011) Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert A, Schmitt M (2016) Justice sensitivity. In: Sabbagh C, Schmitt M (eds) Handbook of social justice theory and research. Springer, New York., pp 161–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1976) The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Becker GN (1997) The economics of life: from baseball to affirmative action to immigration, how real-world issues affect our everyday life. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder M, Lades LK (2015) Autonomy-enhancing paternalism. Kyklos 68(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GE, Güth W, Ockenfels A, Roth AE (2010) Social behavior in economic games. In: Ockenfels A, Sadrieh A (eds) The Selten School of Behavioral Economics: a collection of essays in honor of Reinhard Selten. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 185–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2017) Anthropologie économique: Cours au Collège de France (1992–1993). Raisons d’agir/Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchner S, Coricelli G, Greiner B (2007) Self-centered and other-regarding behavior in the solidarity game. J Econ Behav Organ 62(2):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn SM (2015) Reintroducing macroeconomics: a critical approach, reprint. Routledge, Abingdon/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U (2009) Homo Reciprocans: survey evidence on behavioural outcomes. Econ J 119(536):592–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games Econ Behav 54(2):293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson E (2015) Mechanism of altruism approach to blood donor recruitment and retention: a review and future directions. Transfus Med 25(4):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson P (2019) Post-growth politics: a critical theoretical and policy framework for decarbonisation. Cham, Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman MA (2005) Cracking the foundational myths: independence, autonomy, and self-sufficiency. In: Fineman MA, Dougherty T (eds) Feminism confronts homo economicus: gender, law, and society. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman MA, Dougherty T (eds) (2005) Feminism confronts homo economicus: gender, law, and society. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect Well-being. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Selten R (eds) (2001) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (eds) (2005) Moral sentiments and material interests: the foundations of cooperation in economic life. MIT Press, Cambridge MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (2010) Individualism: true and false. In: Hayek FA (ed) Studies on the abuse and decline of reason: text and documents. Collected works, vol 13. Routledge, London/New York, pp 46–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (2011) The constitution of liberty, the definitive edition. Collected works, vol 17. Routledge, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitson GJ (1999) Feminist economics: interrogating the masculinity of rational economic man. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northhampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (2013a) The passions and the interests: political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. , First Princeton Classics edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (2013b) The concept of interest: from euphemism to tautology. In: Adelman J (ed) The essential Hirschman. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford, pp 195–213

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (2013c) Against parsimony: three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. In: Adelman J (ed) The essential Hirschman. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford, pp 248–264

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer M (1947) Eclipse of reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1994) The nature of man. J Appl Corp Financ 7(2):4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1449–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karniol R, Miller DT (1981) Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In: Lerner MJ, Lerner SC (eds) The justice motive in social behavior: adapting to times of scarcity and change. Plenum Press, New York, pp 73–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner G (2008) Homo oeconomicus: the economic model of behaviour and its applications in economics and other social sciences. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski P (2000) Solidarism, capitalism, and economic ethics in Heinrich Pesch. In: Koslowski P (ed) The theory of capitalism in the German economic tradition: historism, ordo-liberalism, critical theory, solidarism. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 371–394

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg S (1985) An assessment of the new political economy: its potential for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociol Theory 3(1):99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütge C, Strosetzki C (eds) (2019) The honorable merchant – between modesty and risk-taking: intercultural and literary aspects. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz MA (1999) Economics for the common good: two centuries of social economic thought in the humanistic tradition. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzeschke A (ed) (2010) Sei ökonomisch! Prägende Menschenbilder zwischen Modellbildung und Wirkmächtigkeit. LIT Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer T (1993) Truth versus precision in economics. Edward Elgar, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey D (2005) The demoralization of economics: can we recover from Bentham and return to Smith? In: Fineman MA, Dougherty T (eds) Feminism confronts Homo Economicus: gender, law, and society. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean I, Poulton J (1986) Good blood, bad blood, and the gift relationship revisited. J Publ Policy 6(4):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meikle S (1995) Aristotle’s economic thought. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1985) Remarks on Bentham’s philosophy. In: Mill JS (ed) Essays on ethics, religion, and society. Collected works, vol 10. University of Toronto Press/Routledge/Kegan Paul, Toronto/London, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises J (1998) Human action: a treatise on economics, the Scholar’s edn. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada L, Maes J (2016) Justice and self-interest. In: Sabbagh C, Schmitt M (eds) Handbook of social justice theory and research. Springer, New York, pp 109–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M, Highfield R (2011) Super cooperators – beyond the survival of the fittest: why cooperation, not competition, is the key to life. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle EJ (2010) The origins of homo economicus: a note. https://mayoresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ORIGINS-HOMO-ECONOMICUS-mar102010.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  • Peralta A, Mshana RR (2016) The greed line: tool for a just economy. WCC Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Persky J (1995) The ethology of homo economicus. JEP 9(2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan S (ed) (2018) Capitalism beyond mutuality? Perspectives integrating philosophy and social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (2009) Man, economy, and state: a treatise on economic principles with power and market: government and the economy, 2nd edn, Scholar’s edn. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlösser T, Berger S, Fetchenhauer D (2018) Justice sensitivity and cooperation dynamics in repeated public good games. Soc Justice Res 31:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott James C (1976) The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press, New Haven/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1990) Bounded rationality. J Inst Theor Econ 146(4):649–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1979) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In: Harris H (ed) Scientific models and man. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1987) On ethics and economics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (2016) Famine, affluence, and morality, New Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1976) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart W (2003) Der Bourgeois: Zur Geistesgeschichte des modernen Wirtschaftsmenschen, 6th edn. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1985) Atomism. In: Taylor C philosophy and the human sciences: philosophical papers vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (2015) Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. W. W Norton & Company, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielmann I, Hilbig BE (2015) Trust: an integrative review from a person-situation perspective. Rev Gen Psychol 19(3):249–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss RM (1970) The gift relationship: from human blood to social policy. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis Y (1998) Foundations of economics: a Beginner’s companion. Routledge, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood EM (2002) The origin of capitalism. Verso, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer VA (2011) Economic lives: how culture shapes the economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Staats- und Sozialwissenschaften, Universität der Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, Germany

    Friedrich Lohmann

Authors
  1. Friedrich Lohmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Lohmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lohmann, F. (2020). Anthropological Underpinnings of Business Ethics and Work Ethics in Relation to Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_44-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_44-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation