Abstract
Ethical blindness describes the temporary inability of a person to make moral judgments and acting morally in the context of working in an organization. Such a failure of moral judgment can be harmful and may damage the entire organization, its reputation, and public legitimacy. This chapter provides both an introductory overview and definition of the theory of “ethical blindness.” The chapter proceeds by first introducing to the general social phenomenon of ethical blindness. Then it presents the specific theory of ethical blindness proposed by Palazzo et al. (J Bus Ethics 109:323–338, 2012). The structure is as follows: First, the chapter shows how the theory relies on an epistemology of individuals’ cognitive propensity to be fallible in combination with a theory of individual “sensemaking” and “framing.” The sensemaking process is under external pressure from social contexts within the organization and its surrounding society. The possible outcome of inflexible and too “rigid framing” is ethical blindness – an incapacity to be sensitive to moral demands elicited by the situation. Second, the normative aspect of the theory is outlined to argue for a pluralistic democratizing of the business organization as a means to prevent ethical blindness in the organization. The theory of political CSR is suggested as a means to secure business legitimacy and counteract ethical blindness in organizations. Finally, the chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the practical usages of the theory of ethical blindness as a possible template for a tool to educate employees to withstand pressures that might lead to harmful ethical blindness in the working place.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alvesson M, Spicer A (2016) The stupidity paradox – the power and pitfalls of functional stupidity at work. Profile Books, London
Anderson E (2017) Private government: how employers rule our lives (and why we don't talk about it). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arendt H (1994 [1963]) Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books, New York
Bovens L (2016) The ethics of Dieselgate. Midwest Stud Philos 40(1):262–283
Brenkert GG (2018) Mind the gap! The challenges and limits of (global) business ethics. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3902-6
Brenkert GG (2010) Whistle-blowing, moral integrity, and organizational ethics. In: Brenkert GG (ed) The Oxford handbook of business ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cederström C, Marinetto M (2013) Corporate social responsibility á la the liberal communist. Organization 20(3):416–432
Ciepley D (2013) Beyond public and private: toward a political theory of the corporation. Am Polit Sci Rev 107(1):139–158
French P (1979) The corporation as a moral person. Am Philos Q 16(3):207–215
Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manag Learn Edu 4(1):75–81
Gjerris M (2015) Willed blindness: a discussion of our moral shortcomings in relation to animals. J Agric Environ Ethics 28(3):517–532
Gonin M, Palazzo G, Hoffrage U (2012) Neither bad apple nor bad barrel: how the societal context impacts unethical behavior in organizations. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 21:31–46
Herzog L (2018) Reclaiming the system: moral responsibility, divided labour, and the role of organizations in society. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Heugens PPMAR, Scherer AG (2010) When organization theory met business ethics: toward further symbioses. Bus Ethics Q 20(4):643–672
Landemore H, Ferreras I (2016) In defense of workplace democracy: towards a justification of the firm-state analogy. Political Theory 44/1:53–81
Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30:166–179
Morgan G (1997) Images of organization. Sage Publishing, London
Moriarty J (2005) On the relevance of political philosophy to business ethics. Bus Ethics Q 15:455–473
Orts EW, Craig Smith N (2017) The moral responsibility of firms. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Palazzo G, Krings F, Hoffrage U (2012) Ethical blindness. J Bus Ethics 109:323–338
Pettit P (2007) Responsibility incorporated. Ethics 117(2):171–201
Rawls J (1994) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York
Rhodes C (2016) Democratic business ethics: Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and the disruption of corporate sovereignty. Organ Stud 37(10):1501–1518
Sabadoz C, Singer A (2017) Talk ain’t cheap: political CSR and the challenges of corporate deliberation. Bus Ethics Q 27(02):183–211
Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32:1096–1120
Solomon R (1993) Ethics and excellence – cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sørensen BM, Villadsen K (2018) Penis-whirling and pie-throwing: norm-defying and norm-setting drama in the creative industries. Hum Relat (New York) 71(8):1049–1071
Werhane PH (2008) Mental models, moral imagination and system thinking in the age of globalization. J Bus Ethics 78(3):463–474
Young IM (2001) Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29(5):670–690
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Høyer Toft, K. (2019). Ethical Blindness and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_33-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_33-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities