Abstract
This chapter focuses on Arendt’s notion of a republic of citizens united by a plural collective public arena. First, we clarify that, for Arendt, authentic self-determination means cooperatively bringing the human aptitude for action to refer to whatever is inaccurate in the joint arrangements. Political realms where individuals represent themselves materialize whenever citizens constitute them. The collaborative, disorganized architecture of the council system (an inverted political structure centered on local legislative bodies that are accessible to all individuals and so enable them to be involved in the government) functions as a series of interlinked arenas for democratic purposes and as a catalyst for emphasizing the meaning of the citizens’ community. What concerns power is the protest of individuals – their vigorous demonstrations in public spaces to convince other people of their ideas. Second, we observe that, for Arendt, educational action supplies individuals with a withdrawal from the deep-rooted, shaping, multiple self. The substance of politics is action as laws and institutions provide the fabric for action that can demand underlying relevance, self-containedness, and thus freedom. Individuals are plural beings who aim to perform and to reveal themselves, requiring a political arena of actualization to do so. As individuals are social, political action is a question of cooperation between peers. Individuals are outstanding when they exhibit their distinct individualities in the public arena. Citizens acting cooperatively identify among themselves an efficiency somewhat inconsistent with their individual resources. Third, we hold that, for Arendt, the public educational sphere cannot be established in official and actual terms but becomes a reality when individuals participate in action in relation to human meaning. Human status, i.e., the right to citizenship, represents a transcendent standard. In the public sphere, the social self must be permanently assertive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future. New York: The Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1963a). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: The Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1963b). On revolution. London: Penguin Books.
Arendt, H. (1968). Men in dark times. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1969). Thoughts on politics and revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Baehr, P. (2010). Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the social sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Buckler, S. (2011). Hannah Arendt and political theory: Challenging the tradition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Canovan, M. (1992). Hannah Arendt: A reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colliot-Thélène, C. (2018). Democracy and subjective rights: Democracy without demos. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Curtis, K. (2001). Multicultural education and Arendtian conservatism: On memory, historical injury, and our sense of the common. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world (pp. 127–152). Boulder: Westview Press.
Dossa, S. (1989). The public realm and the public self: The political theory of Hannah Arendt. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Duarte, E. (2001). The eclipse of thinking: An Arendtian critique of cooperative learning. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world (pp. 201–224). Boulder: Westview Press.
Euben, P. (2001). Hannah Arendt on politicizing the university and other clichés. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world (pp. 175–200). Boulder: Westview Press.
Gordon, M. (2001). Hannah Arendt on authority: Conservatism in education reconsidered. In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world (pp. 37–66). Boulder: Westview Press.
Knott, M. L. (2017). Introduction. In M. L. Knott (Ed.), The correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem (pp. vii–xvi). A. David (tr.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kohn, J. (2018). Introduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Thinking without a banister: Essays in understanding, 1953–1975 (pp. ix–xxx). New York: Schocken Books.
Lane, A. (2001). Is Hannah Arendt a multiculturalist? In M. Gordon (Ed.), Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world (pp. 153–174). Boulder: Westview Press.
Lăzăroiu, G. (2013). Besley on Foucault’s discourse of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 821–832.
Lăzăroiu, G. (2017a). The routine fabric of understandable and contemptible lies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 573–574.
Lăzăroiu, G. (2017b). Is there an absence of capability in sustainable development in universities? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 1305–1308.
Markell, P. (2006). The rule of the people: Arendt, archê, and democracy. American Political Science Review, 100, 1–14.
Mihăilă, R. (2017). The lying epidemic. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 580–581.
Mihăilă, R., Popescu, G. H., & Nica, E. (2016). Educational conservatism and democratic citizenship in Hannah Arendt. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, 915–927.
Nica, E. (2017). Political mendacity and social trust. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 571–572.
Nica, E. (2018). Has the shift to overworked and underpaid adjunct faculty helped education outcomes? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50, 213–216.
Nixon, J. (2015). Hannah Arendt and the politics of friendship. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Pitkin, H. F. (1998). The attack of the blob: Hannah Arendt’s concept of the social. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Popescu, G. H. (2017). Is lying acceptable conduct in international politics? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 575–576.
Popescu, G. H. (2018). Does student debt constitute a bubble that may bring about an educational crisis? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50, 115–118.
Roberts-Miller, P. (2002). Fighting without hatred: Hannah Arendt’s agonistic rhetoric. Journal of Advanced Composition, 22, 585–602.
Schutz, A. (2002). Is political education an oxymoron? Hannah Arendt’s resistance to public spaces in schools. In S. Rice (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2001 (pp. 324–332). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.
Topolski, A. (2008). Creating citizens in the classroom: Hannah Arendt’s political critique of education. Ethical Perspectives, 15, 259–282.
Tyner, A. H. (2017). Action, judgment, and imagination in Hannah Arendt’s thought. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 523–534.
Villa, D. R. (1996). Arendt and Heidegger: The fate of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zembylas, M. (2018). Hannah Arendt’s political thinking on emotions and education: Implications for democratic education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1508423.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mihăilă, R., Lăzăroiu, G. (2019). Arendt, Citizenship, and Education. In: Peterson, A., Stahl, G., Soong, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_49-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_49-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education