Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules

2018 Edition
| Editors: Sangdun Choi

Net1 (Neuroepithelial Cell Transforming Gene 1 Protein)

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_554

Synonyms

Historical Background

Rho family small GTPases control multiple cell functions, including organization of the actin cytoskeletal, cell motility and invasion, and cell cycle progression. They act as molecular switches, cycling between their active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound states. When bound to GTP, Rho GTPases initiate intracellular signaling by binding to downstream proteins known as effectors (Jaffe and Hall 2005). The activation state of Rho GTPases is controlled by three families of proteins, known as GDP exchange factors (Rho GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (Rho GAPs), and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (Rho GDIs). Rho GEFs activate Rho proteins by stimulating the release of GDP, thereby allowing the binding of GTP (Rossman et al. 2005; Meller et al. 2005). Rho GAPs accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rho proteins to hydrolyze GTP to GDP (Tcherkezian and Lamarche-Vane 2007). Rho GDIs sequester inactive, GDP-bound Rho GTPases in the cytosol, thereby maintaining and stabilizing a ready pool of Rho proteins for subsequent activation (DerMardirossian and Bokoch 2005). Within this regulatory network, it is the Rho GEFs that are primarily responsible for translating upstream signaling events into Rho protein activation.

During the mid-1990s a number of groups used NIH 3T3 cell focus formation assays to identify candidate oncogenes. In this type of screen, 3T3 cells are made to express a cDNA expression library derived from cancer cells and then tested for subsequent loss of contact inhibition. This can be observed through the formation of cell foci, which are essentially masses of transformed cells. The neuroepithelial transforming gene 1 (Net1) was discovered in this way using a cDNA library derived from neuroepithelioma cells (Chan et al. 1996). The Net1 cDNA initially cloned from this screen lacked the coding sequence for the first 145 amino acids of full length Net1, which was subsequently found to be critical to its transforming activity. NIH 3T3 cells expressing truncated Net1 exhibited anchorage-independent growth in soft agar assays and were tumorigenic when injected into nude mice. Thus, Net1 fit the requirements for a putative oncogene.

Since that time it has become appreciated that Net1 belongs to a large family of Rho GEFs containing tandem diffuse B cell lymphoma (Dbl) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. There are nearly 70 members within the Rho GEF family that exhibit different specificities for Rho proteins, distinct regulatory mechanisms, and unique tissue distributions (Rossman et al. 2005). Net1 was originally described as being widely expressed in humans, with lower levels of expression in the heart, brain, and pancreas (Chan et al. 1996). It was later shown that Net1 isoforms are also widely expressed in mice, with substantial expression in nearly all tissues except the brain, heart, and skeletal muscle (Zuo et al. 2014). Two isoforms of Net1 exist, Net1 and Net1A, which are identical except for their N-terminal regulatory domains (Fig. 1). The N-terminus of the longer Net1 isoform consists of an 85 amino acid span that contains two nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences (Schmidt and Hall 2002), while the unique 31 amino acid portion of Net1A has no identified function. The rest of the N-terminus is shared between Net1 isoforms, and this region contains two additional NLS sequences (Song et al. 2015). The DH domains of Net1 proteins bind to RhoA, and in conjunction with the PH domain mediate RhoA activation. Although PH domains were originally characterized as phosphoinositide-binding domains, the PH domain of Net1 has not been shown to bind phospholipids. The shared C-terminus of Net1 isoforms is 95 amino acids in length and contains a C-terminal PDZ domain-binding site which mediates interaction with Dlg1 and Magi1b (Garcia-Mata et al. 2007; Carr et al. 2009; Dobrosotskaya 2001).
Net1 (Neuroepithelial Cell Transforming Gene 1 Protein), Fig. 1

Domain organization of Net1 proteins. Nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences are shown in orange. The catalytic Dbl homology (DH) domain is shown in light blue. The pleckstrin homology (PH) domain is shown in light green. The C-terminal PDZ domain-binding site (PDZ) is shown in dark blue. Serine 152 is a negative regulatory Pak1 phosphorylation site (serine 98 in Net1A). Serine 46 is a negative regulatory AMPK phosphorylation site. Numbers refer to amino acids within human Net1 and Net1A

Regulation of Net1 Activity

Net1 isoform transcription is precisely regulated by alternative promoters which allows for their differential expression (Dutertre et al. 2010). For example, in MCF7 breast cancer cells estrogen potently stimulates Net1 transcription and weakly downregulates Net1A transcription. On the other hand, progesterone stimulates the transcription of both Net1 and Net1A in MCF7 and T47D breast cancer cells (Dutertre et al. 2010) (Richer et al. 2002). TGFβ has been reported to stimulate Net1A expression in HaCaT human keratinocytes and ARPE-19 retinal pigment epithelial cells by Smad2/3- and Erk1/2-dependent pathways (Shen et al. 2001; Papadimitriou et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2010). Moreover, Net1 isoform mRNAs are subject to downregulation by miR-24 in keratinocytes and miR-22 in K562 leukemia cells (Papadimitriou et al. 2011; Ahmad et al. 2014). Other studies have not differentiated between Net1 isoforms when assessing Net1 expression. For example, IL-2 stimulation increases Net1 expression in Kit 225 human lymphocytes (Mzali et al. 2005). Both  TNFα and LPA stimulate Net1 expression in AGS gastric cancer cells (Leyden et al. 2006; Murray et al. 2008). RANKL stimulates Net1 expression in RAW264.7 mouse macrophages (Brazier et al. 2006). Sonic hedgehog stimulates Net1 expression in myocytes during limb bud development (Hu et al. 2012).

Once translated, the cellular activity of Net1 proteins is highly regulated by subcellular localization, posttranslational modification, and degradation. Net1 isoforms contain multiple NLS sequences in their amino-termini, and when overexpressed in cells they accumulate in the nucleus (Schmidt and Hall 2002; Song et al. 2015; Qin et al. 2005). Since RhoA activation occurs at the plasma membrane, this means that nuclear sequestration of Net1 isoforms is a mechanism to negatively regulate their activities. The longer Net1 isoform has not been reported to localize outside the nucleus. However, integrin ligation, LPA, TGFβ, and EGF have all been reported to cause cytoplasmic accumulation of Net1A (Papadimitriou et al. 2011; Murray et al. 2008; Carr et al. 2012, 2013). These observations suggest that only Net1A controls RhoA activation, which is supported by data indicating that knockdown of Net1A, but not Net1, impairs breast cancer cell motility and invasive capacity in vitro (Carr et al. 2013). Signaling pathways controlling Net1A cytoplasmic accumulation are not well defined. Integrin activation, LPA, and EGF all require activation of Rac1 for cytoplasmic localization of Net1A, and overexpression of constitutively active Rac1 potently stimulates Net1A cytoplasmic accumulation (Song et al. 2015; Carr et al. 2012, 2013). Net1A is also acetylated on two sites surrounding its second NLS, which is required for cytoplasmic localization following EGF stimulation (Song et al. 2015). Net1A export from the nucleus is likely to require the nuclear exportin CRM1, as treatment of cells with leptomycin causes the Net1 truncation mutant Net1ΔN, which still contains one NLS, to accumulate in the nucleus (Schmidt and Hall 2002). There is no identifiable nuclear export sequence (NES) in Net1 isoforms, suggesting that Net1A must bind to another protein for CRM1-mediated nuclear export. These data support a model in which ligand stimulation activates Rac1, which signals to Net1A to cause CRM1-mediated nuclear export. Reimport into the nucleus would be slowed by acetylation of the second of the two NLS sequences, thereby allowing cytoplasmic accumulation and RhoA activation (Fig. 2).
Net1 (Neuroepithelial Cell Transforming Gene 1 Protein), Fig. 2

Regulation of the subcellular localization of Net1A. Exposure of cells to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) or integrin ligands stimulates Rac1, which then causes CRM1-mediated nuclear export of Net1A. Once in the cytoplasm Net1A stimulates RhoA activation, leading to actomyosin contraction. Acetylation of Net1A reduces its rate of nuclear re-import. Once deacetylated, Net1A is either imported into the nucleus or targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation

Once in the cytoplasm Net1A activity is negatively regulated by phosphorylation and proteasome-mediated degradation. Net1 is phosphorylated by the Rac and Cdc42-regulated kinase  Pak1, which inhibits its catalytic activity (Alberts et al. 2005). Presumably Net1A is also phosphorylated by Pak1, as these phosphorylation sites are conserved between isoforms. Pak1 phosphorylates Net1 on serines 152, 153, and 538 in vitro, and on serine 152 in cells. Serines 152 and 153 are contained within an amino-terminal extension of the DH domain that is restricted to a subset of RhoA-specific GEFs (Alberts and Treisman 1998). Substitution of serines 152 and 153 with the phosphorylation mimetic glutamate inhibits the ability of Net1 to catalyze GDP exchange on RhoA in vitro and blocks the ability of expressed Net1ΔN to cause actin stress fiber formation in cells. Similarly, overexpression of constitutively active Pak1 blocks actin stress fiber formation caused by coexpression of wild type Net1, but not by a Net1 mutant containing alanine substitutions at serines 152 and 153 (Alberts et al. 2005). Net1A is also subject to phosphorylation on serine 46 by AMPK, which inhibits its ability to stimulate invadopodia formation (Schaffer et al. 2015).

The cellular activity of Net1A is tightly regulated by ubiquitylation (Carr et al. 2009; Papadimitriou et al. 2011). Net1 isoforms contain a C-terminal PDZ domain-binding site that mediates interaction with proteins within the Dlg1 family (Garcia-Mata et al. 2007; Carr et al. 2009). Interaction of Net1A with Dlg1 prevents its ubiquitylation in MCF7 breast cancer cells and increases its half-life from 25 min to 105 h. This effect is specific for Dlg1, since coexpression of the Net1-interacting PDZ domain protein Magi1b does not stabilize Net1A (Carr et al. 2009). The truncation mutant Net1ΔN is stable when expressed in MCF7 cells, indicating that the amino-terminus of Net1A is important for regulating its degradation (Carr et al. 2009). Interestingly, interaction of endogenous Net1A with Dlg1 in these cells is dependent on the formation of E-cadherin-mediated cell contacts, since disruption of these contacts causes a rapid and dramatic increase in Net1A ubiquitylation. Net1A is also degraded following integrin ligation, as treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 prolongs cytoplasmic accumulation of Net1A following cell replating on collagen (Carr et al. 2012).

Regulation of Actin Cytoskeletal Organization by Net1

Net1 has been shown to act as a GEF for RhoA and RhoB, but not Rac1 or Cdc42 (Alberts and Treisman 1998; Srougi and Burridge 2011). When overexpressed in mouse fibroblasts, Net1 stimulates the formation of actin stress fibers, which is a hallmark of RhoA activation (Alberts and Treisman 1998). The N-terminal truncation mutant Net1ΔN is far more efficient at stimulating stress fiber formation than full length Net1 or Net1A, which is due to the enhanced cytoplasmic localization of Net1ΔN (Qin et al. 2005). Net1 isoforms have also been reported to mediate actin stress fiber formation in human keratinocytes and retinal pigment epithelial cells following stimulation with TGFβ (Shen et al. 2001; Papadimitriou et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2010). In addition, Net1A promotes actin polymerization and focal adhesion maturation in MCF7 cells during adhesion (Carr et al. 2012). Similar to other RhoA-subfamily GEFs, the ability of Net1 isoforms to stimulate actin stress fiber formation is dependent on downstream activation of the RhoA effector kinases  ROCK1 and  ROCK2 (Tran et al. 2000).

Additional Physiological Roles of Net1

Net1 plays important roles during development and differentiation. For example, in chicken epiblasts Net1A expression is required for RhoA activation at the basal surface and maintenance of the integrity of the basement membrane (Nakaya et al. 2008). During gastrulation, epiblasts undergo an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) that is accompanied by loss of Net1A expression on the basal membrane, and enforced expression of RhoA or Net1A in these cells prevents basement membrane breakdown and EMT (Nakaya et al. 2008). Similarly, overexpression of xNet1A in Xenopus embryos inhibits gastrulation movements (Miyakoshi et al. 2004). Long-term treatment of HaCaT keratinocytes with TGFβ, which causes EMT, also downregulates Net1A expression (Papadimitriou et al. 2011). These data indicate that cells must downregulate Net1A for EMT to occur. Alternatively, Net1A expression is strongly upregulated during mouse osteoclast differentiation in vitro, and inhibition of Net1A expression prevents cell fusion that is required for osteoclast formation (Brazier et al. 2006). All of these processes are associated with dramatic changes in actin cytoskeletal organization or altered cell motility, both of which are RhoA-regulated events.

Recently it has been shown that Net1 expression is required for mouse mammary gland development during puberty (Zuo et al. 2014). Mice with a Net1 deletion are viable and have offspring at normal Mendelian ratios, but experience a delay in mammary gland development. This is characterized by reduced invasion of milk ducts into the mammary fat pad and reduced branching complexity of the ductal tree. This is due to blunted RhoA signaling to the actomyosin contractile apparatus and reduced expression of estrogen receptor α. Although the ductal tree eventually fills the fat pad, ductal branching remains incomplete (Zuo et al. 2014).

By regulating the activation of RhoA and MAP Kinases, Net1 also impacts transcription factor activation. For example, overexpression of the N-terminal deletion mutant Net1ΔN in NIH 3T3 cells stimulates serum response factor (SRF) activation. This requires activation of both RhoA and the stress-activated protein kinase/Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) pathway (Alberts and Treisman 1998). In Hela cells, Net1ΔN expression stimulates SAPK/JNK activation through interaction with the scaffold protein connector enhancer of KSR 1 (CNK1), which results in efficient activation of the transcription factor c-Jun (Jaffe et al. 2005). Stimulation of c-Jun activity by Net1ΔN requires both RhoA and SAPK/JNK activation, and stimulation of c-Jun activity by the extracellular ligand LPA requires endogenous CNK1 expression. However, it is unknown whether LPA-stimulated c-Jun activity also requires endogenous Net1. Net1 also interacts with CARMA1 and CARMA3 to stimulate NFκB activation in Jurkat T cells and HEK293 cells, respectively (Vessichelli et al. 2012). This effect is specific for ligands such as PMA/ionomycin, LPA, and IL1β, but not TNFα (Fig. 3a).
Net1 (Neuroepithelial Cell Transforming Gene 1 Protein), Fig. 3

Regulation of cell signaling by Net1. Net1 proteins respond to diverse stimuli to contribute to intracellular signaling following exposure to (a) extracellular growth factors or (b) double-strand DNA damage

Net1 plays a role in DNA damage signaling (Fig. 3b). Net1 is dephosphorylated on the negative regulatory site serine 152 following exposure of Hela cells to ionizing radiation (IR) (Guerra et al. 2008). In addition, RNAi-mediated knockdown of Net1 expression prevents RhoA activation and sensitizes these cells to IR-induced apoptosis. RhoA activation by Net1 may occur exclusively in the nucleus (Dubash et al. 2011). Net1 knockdown also blocks activation of p38 MAPK and its downstream substrate MAPKAP2, both of which are required for cell survival following IR exposure (Guerra et al. 2008). Net1, along with the Rho GEF Ect2, has also been shown to stimulate RhoB activation after IR exposure in MCF7 cells, an event which promotes cell death (Srougi and Burridge 2011). However, whether Net1 promotes cell survival or death after IR is controversial, since another group found that Net1 knockdown protected MCF7 cells from IR-mediated cell death (Oh and Frost 2014). In this study it was also found that inhibition of Net1 expression reduced ATM activation and H2AX phosphorylation. Surprisingly, overexpression of wild type or catalytically inactive Net1A also suppressed ATM activation. Expression of constitutively active RhoA or RhoB did not affect ATM. These data suggest that Net1A controls DNA damage signaling in a Rho GTPase independent manner.

Net1 and Cancer

Net1 was originally identified as a potential oncogene in mouse fibroblasts (Chan et al. 1996), and subsequent work suggests that it may play an important role in human cancer. For example, Net1 transcripts are overexpressed in human gastric and hepatocellular cancers, as well as gliomas (Leyden et al. 2006; Shen et al. 2008; Tu et al. 2010). In gastric cancer this may be due to alternative polyadenylation which shortens the 3′ UTR of Net1, resulting in enhanced expression (Lai et al. 2015). In estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients, coexpression of Net1 protein with alpha6beta4 integrin is predictive of decreased distant metastasis-free survival (Gilcrease et al. 2009). This study did not distinguish between Net1 isoforms. In a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients, high expression of Net1 mRNA, but not Net1A, was prognostic for decreased metastasis-free survival (Dutertre et al. 2010).

Net1 isoforms appear to contribute to cancer cell function in an isoform-specific manner, such that the longer Net1 isoform primarily contributes to proliferation while the shorter Net1A isoform contributes to motility. For example, siRNA knockdown of both Net1 isoforms in AGS gastric cancer cells inhibits their proliferation as well as their ability to invade a Matrigel extracellular matrix (Leyden et al. 2006; Murray et al. 2008). However, only knockdown of Net1, but not Net1A, inhibits MCF7 cell proliferation (Dutertre et al. 2010). This may be a due to a role for the Net1 isoform in controlling mitotic progression (Menon et al. 2013). On the other hand, knockdown of Net1A, but not Net1, inhibits motility and invasion of human breast cancer cells (Carr et al. 2013). Accordingly, Net1A, but not Net1, interacts with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) during cell adhesion and colocalizes with FAK in an actomyosin-dependent manner. During Matrigel invasion, Net1A is required for amoeboid, RhoA-dependent, but not integrin-driven, mesenchymal invasion (Carr et al. 2013). Overexpression of Net1A also drives invadopodia formation, which is inhibited by phosphorylation on serine 46 by AMPK (Schaffer et al. 2015). Taken together these data suggest that Net1 isoforms may contribute to human cancer. Future studies in mouse models of cancer will be required to assess whether the functions of each isoform identified in cancer cells in vitro will apply to tumorigenesis or metastasis in vivo.

Summary

Net1 is a Rho GEF that is specific for the RhoA subfamily of small G proteins. Two isoforms exist in most cells which exhibit differential subcellular distributions and may play distinct roles in the cell. The activities of Net1 proteins are tightly regulated by phosphorylation and ubiquitylation. Net1 proteins play important roles in development and also contribute to cellular differentiation. Net1 proteins may also be aberrantly expressed in human cancers and contribute to cancer initiation and/or progression.

References

  1. Ahmad HM, Muiwo P, Ramachandran SS, Pandey P, Gupta YK, Kumar L, et al. miR-22 regulates expression of oncogenic neuro-epithelial transforming gene 1, NET1. FEBS J. 2014;281(17):3904–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts AS, Treisman R. Activation of RhoA and SAPK/JNK signalling pathways by the RhoA-specific exchange factor mNET1. EMBO J. 1998;17:4075–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberts AS, Qin H, Carr HS, Frost JA. PAK1 negatively regulates the activity of the Rho exchange factor NET1. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(13):12152–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brazier H, Stephens S, Ory S, Fort P, Morrison N, Blangy A. Expression profile of RhoGTPases and RhoGEFs during RANKL-stimulated osteoclastogenesis: identification of essential genes in osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(9):1387–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr HS, Cai C, Keinanen K, Frost JA. Interaction of the RhoA exchange factor Net1 with discs large homolog 1 protects it from proteasome mediated degradation and potentiates Net1 activity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(36):24269–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr HS, Morris CA, Menon S, Song EH, Frost JA. Rac1 controls the subcellular localization of the RhoGEF Net1A to regulate focal adhesion formation and cell spreading. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;33(3):622–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr HS, Zuo Y, Oh W, Frost JA. Regulation of FAK activation, breast cancer cell motility and amoeboid invasion by the RhoA GEF Net1. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:2773–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan AM, Takai S, Yamada K, Miki T. Isolation of a novel oncogene, NET1, from neuroepithelioma cells by expression cDNA cloning. Oncogene. 1996;12:1259–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DerMardirossian C, Bokoch GM. GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15(7):356–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobrosotskaya IY. Identification of mNET1 as a candidate ligand for the first PDZ domain of MAGI-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283(4):969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubash AD, Guilluy C, Srougi MC, Boulter E, Burridge K, Garcia-Mata R. The small GTPase RhoA localizes to the nucleus and is activated by Net1 and DNA damage signals. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17380.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutertre M, Gratadou L, Dardenne E, Germann S, Samaan S, Lidereau R, et al. Estrogen regulation and physiopathologic significance of alternative promoters in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(9):3760–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Mata R, Dubash AD, Sharek L, Carr HS, Frost JA, Burridge K. The nuclear RhoA exchange factor Net1 interacts with proteins of the Dlg family, affects their localization, and influences their tumor suppressor activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(24):8683–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilcrease MZ, Kilpatrick SK, Woodward WA, Zhou X, Nicolas MM, Corley LJ, et al. Coexpression of alpha6beta4 integrin and guanine nucleotide exchange factor Net1 identifies node-positive breast cancer patients at high risk for distant metastasis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(1):80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guerra L, Carr HS, Richter-Dahlfors A, Masucci MG, Thelestam M, Frost JA, et al. A bacterial cytotoxin identifies the RhoA exchange factor Net1 as a key effector in the response to DNA damage. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2254.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu JK, McGlinn E, Harfe BD, Kardon G, Tabin CJ. Autonomous and nonautonomous roles of Hedgehog signaling in regulating limb muscle formation. Genes Dev. 2012;26(18):2088–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaffe AB, Hall A, Schmidt A. Association of CNK1 with Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors controls signaling specificity downstream of Rho. Curr Biol. 2005;15(5):405–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lai DP, Tan S, Kang YN, Wu J, Ooi HS, Chen J, et al. Genome-wide profiling of polyadenylation sites reveals a link between selective polyadenylation and cancer metastasis. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(12):3410–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee J, Moon HJ, Lee JM, Joo CK. Smad3 regulates Rho signaling via NET1 in the transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(34):26618–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leyden J, Murray D, Moss A, Arumuguma M, Doyle E, McEntee G, et al. Net1 and Myeov: computationally identified mediators of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(8):1204–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meller N, Merlot S, Guda C. CZH proteins: a new family of Rho-GEFs. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 21):4937–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menon S, Oh W, Carr HS, Frost JA. Rho GTPase independent regulation of mitotic progression by the RhoGEF Net1. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24(17):2655–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miyakoshi A, Ueno N, Kinoshita N. Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor xNET1 implicated in gastrulation movements during Xenopus development. Differentiation. 2004;72(1):48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murray D, Horgan G, MacMathuna P, Doran P. NET1-mediated RhoA activation facilitates lysophosphatidic acid-induced cell migration and invasion in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(8):1322–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mzali R, Seguin L, Liot C, Auger A, Pacaud P, Loirand G, et al. Regulation of Rho signaling pathways in interleukin-2-stimulated human T-lymphocytes. FASEB J. 2005;19(13):1911–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakaya Y, Sukowati EW, Wu Y, Sheng G. RhoA and microtubule dynamics control cell-basement membrane interaction in EMT during gastrulation. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(7):765–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oh W, Frost JA. Rho GTPase independent regulation of ATM activation and cell survival by the RhoGEF Net1A. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(17):2765–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Papadimitriou E, Vasilaki E, Vorvis C, Iliopoulos D, Moustakas A, Kardassis D, et al. Differential regulation of the two RhoA-specific GEF isoforms Net1/Net1A by TGF-beta and miR-24: role in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncogene. 2011;31(23):2862–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qin H, Carr HS, Wu X, Muallem D, Tran NH, Frost JA. Characterization of the biochemical and transforming properties of the neuroepithelial transforming protein 1. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(9):7603–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richer JK, Jacobsen BM, Manning NG, Abel MG, Wolf DM, Horwitz KB. Differential gene regulation by the two progesterone receptor isoforms in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5209–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossman KL, Der CJ, Sondek J. GEF means go: turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(2):167–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaffer BE, Levin RS, Hertz NT, Maures TJ, Schoof ML, Hollstein PE, et al. Identification of AMPK phosphorylation sites reveals a network of proteins involved in cell invasion and facilitates large-scale substrate prediction. Cell Metab. 2015;22(5):907–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt A, Hall A. The Rho exchange factor Net1 is regulated by nuclear sequestration. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:14581–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen X, Li J, Hu PP, Waddell D, Zhang J, Wang XF. The activity of guanine exchange factor NET1 is essential for transforming growth factor-beta-mediated stress fiber formation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:15362–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shen SQ, Li K, Zhu N, Nakao A. Expression and clinical significance of NET-1 and PCNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2008;25(3):341–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Song EH, Oh W, Ulu A, Carr HS, Zuo Y, Frost JA. Acetylation of the RhoA GEF Net1A controls its subcellular localization and activity. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(5):913–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srougi MC, Burridge K. The nuclear guanine nucleotide exchange factors Ect2 and Net1 regulate RhoB-mediated cell death after DNA damage. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tcherkezian J, Lamarche-Vane N. Current knowledge of the large RhoGAP family of proteins. Biol Cell. 2007;99(2):67–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tran QC, Gautreau A, Arpin M, Treisman R. Ezrin function is required for ROCK-mediated fibroblast transformation by the Net and Dbl oncogenes. EMBO J. 2000;19(17):4565–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tu Y, Lu J, Fu J, Cao Y, Fu G, Kang R, et al. Over-expression of neuroepithelial-transforming protein 1 confers poor prognosis of patients with gliomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(5):388–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vessichelli M, Ferravante A, Zotti T, Reale C, Scudiero I, Picariello G, et al. Neuroepithelial transforming gene 1 (Net1) binds to caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD)- and membrane-associated guanylate kinase-like domain-containing (CARMA) proteins and regulates nuclear factor kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(17):13722–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zuo Y, Berdeaux R, Frost JA. The RhoGEF Net1 is required for normal mammary gland development. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(12):1948–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Integrative Biology and PharmacologyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonUSA