Abstract
In the moving bed biofilm reactor process (MBBR) the sludge is growing as a biofilm on a mobile carrier, mostly made out of plastic material. The carrier is retained in its compartment using retention devices. Aeration and/or mixing ensure a homogeneous exposure of the outside biofilm to the bulk environment.
MBBR allows for a higher biomass concentration in the reactor, thus reducing necessary reactor volume and footprint. The process is mostly diffusion limited and therefore diffusion of substrates through the biofilm is essential for understanding MBBR design. Since modeling of the process becomes complex and analytical solutions are not available, numerical solutions are required for precise design, even if approximate degradation rates are existing.
Furthermore, hydraulics inside of MBBR are important to understand. When not correctly designed, carrier displacement toward the outlet retention devices occurs, which can lead to loss of process performance and/or clogging of the reactor.
Finally, being a biofilm process, the MBBR process is more stable toward toxic shocks than activated sludge treatment. Especially slow growing bacteria will take advantage of the biofilm environment, which will enable an MBBR to treatment compounds that are normally nonbiodegradable or even toxic (aromatic compounds, endocrine disrupting substances, etc.).
Abbreviations
- Ci:
-
Concentration of substance i
- Ci,B:
-
Concentration of substance i in the bulk phase
- Ci,F:
-
Concentration of substance i in the biofilm
- Ci,x = 0:
-
Concentration of substance i at the surface of the biofilm
- Di,F:
-
Diffusion coefficient of compound i in the biofilm
- Di,W:
-
Diffusion coefficient of compound i in the water
- IFAS:
-
Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge
- Ji:
-
Flux of compound i in the biofilm
- LF:
-
Thickness of biofilm
- LL:
-
Thickness of boundary layer
- MBBR:
-
Moving Bed Bioreactor
- Qt:
-
Total Flow
- ri:
-
Relative production rate of compound i
- RL:
-
Resistance to mass transfer of the boundary layer
- S:
-
Section area of reactor
- SRT:
-
Solids retention time
- v:
-
Approach velocity in the reactor
- x:
-
Distance from the surface of the biofilm
References
Leaf W, Boltz J, McQuarrie J, Menniti A, Daigger G (2011) Overcoming hydraulic limitations of the integrated fixed–film activated sludge (IFAS). In: Proceedings of the water environment federation, WEFTEC 2011: session 71 through session 80, pp 5236–5256
Morgenroth E (2008) Modelling biofilms. In: Henze M, van Loosdrecht M, Ekama G, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, London
Ødegaard H (1999) The moving bed biofilm reactor. In: Water environmental engineering and reuse of water. Hokkaido Press, Sapporo, pp 250–305
Rusten B, Hem L, Ødegaard H (1995) Nitrification of municipal wastewater in novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Environ Res 67(1):65–74
Tchobanoglous G, Stensel D, Tsuchihashi R, Burton F, Abu-Orf M, Bowden G, William P (2014) Wastewater engineering treatment and resource recovery. Metcalf & Eddy, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rambosson, P. (2020). Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor in Municipal Used Water Purification. In: Lahnsteiner, J. (eds) Handbook of Water and Used Water Purification. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66382-1_123-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66382-1_123-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66382-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66382-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences