Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Action Research on Sustainable Development

  • Karin TschiggerlEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_158-1

Definition

Action research (AR) can be defined as a systematic type of research enabling “people to find effective solutions to problems they confront in their everyday lives” (Stringer 2013). Based on a reflective process on a cycle of actions, a particular problematic situation can be addressed. The idea behind is that by doing so changes occur within the setting, the participants, as well as the researcher (Herr and Anderson 2005).

Introduction

Since the rise of the international discussion starting with the publication of the Brundtland report “Our common future” in 1987 (WCED 1987), many approaches and programs have been initiated toward a sustainable development. “Sustainable development is a process with the clear vision to change our societies from unsustainable to sustainable” (Baumgartner 2011). Nonetheless, many sustainability-related problems are still existent or even faced by increasing negative impacts. This leads to the assumption of a lacking awareness, ability,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson F (2015) The development of rural sustainability using participatory action research: a case study from Guatemala. J Hum Resour Sustain Stud 3:28–33Google Scholar
  2. Argyris C (2003) Actionable knowledge. In: Tsoukas T, Knudsen C (eds) The Oxford handbook of organization theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 423–452Google Scholar
  3. Ballard D (2005) Using learning processes to promote change for sustainable development. Action Res 3(2):135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner RJ (2011) Critical perspectives of sustainable development research and practice. J Clean Prod 19:783–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner RJ, Korhonen J (2010) Strategic thinking for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 18(2):71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolwig S, Ponte S, du Toit A, Riisgaard L, Halberg N (2008) Integrating poverty, gender and environmental concerns into value chain analysis: a conceptual framework and lessons for action research. Danish Institute for International Studies, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury H (2001) Learning with the natural step: action research to promote conversations for sustainable development. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage, London, pp 307–313Google Scholar
  8. Bratt C (2011) Assessment of eco-labelling and green procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective. Blekinge Institute of Technology, KarlskronaGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns H (2016) Learning sustainability leadership: an action research study of a graduate leadership course. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn 10(2):8Google Scholar
  10. Carr W, Kemmis S (1986) Becoming critical: education, knowledge, and action research. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Coghlan D, Brannick T (2014) Doing action research in your own organization. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Coghlan P, Coghlan D (2002) Action research for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22(2):220–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egmose J (2015) Action research for sustainability. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenwood DJ (2007) Pragmatic action research. Int J Action Res 2(1–2):131–148Google Scholar
  15. Gummesson E (2000) Qualitative methods in management research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  16. Hallstedt SI, Isaksson O (2017) Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development. J Clean Prod 161:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hasan H, Smith S, Finnegan P (2017) An activity theoretic analysis of the mediating role of information systems in tackling climate change adaptation. Inf Syst J 27:271–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herr K, Anderson GL (2005) The action research dissertation: a guide for students and faculty. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewin K (1997 [1946]) Action research and minority problems. In: Lewin K (ed) Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 34–46Google Scholar
  20. Manring SL (2014) The role of universities in developing interdisciplinary action research collaborations to understand and manage resilient social-ecological systems. J Clean Prod 64:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masters J (1995) The history of action research. In: Hughes I (ed) Action research electronic reader. http://www.aral.com.au/arow/rmasters.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  22. Meyers MD (2013) Qualitative research in business & management. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Middel R, Brennan L, Coghlan D, Coghlan P (2005) The application of action learning and action research in collaborative improvement within the extended manufacturing enterprise. In: Kotzab H, Seuring S, Müller M, Reiner G (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Physika, Heidelberg, pp 365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park P (2006) Knowledge and participatory research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) The handbook of action research. Sage, London, pp 83–93Google Scholar
  25. Reason P, Bradbury H (2006) The handbook of action research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Richert M (2017) An energy management framework tailor-made for SMEs: case study of a German car company. J Clean Prod 164:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robèrt K, Borén S, Ny H, Broman G (2017) A strategic approach to sustainable transport system development – part 1: attempting a generic community planning process model. J Clean Prod 140:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shapira H, Ketchie A, Nehe M (2017) The integration of design thinking and strategic sustainable development. J Clean Prod 140:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skinner H (2017) Action research. In: Kubacki K, Rundle-Thiele S (eds) Formative research in social marketing. Springer Science + Business Media, Singapore, pp 11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stringer ET (2013) Action research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Susman GI, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23(4):582–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tschiggerl K (2017) Aktionsforschung und deren Anwendung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Working paper, Montanuniversitaet LeobenGoogle Scholar
  33. Tschiggerl K, Fresner J (2008) From “doing green” to “doing good”: a consultancy perspective of mainstreaming sustainable development through continuous improvement. Paper presented at the Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2008, Queen’s University Management School, Belfast, 7–9 September 2008Google Scholar
  34. Tschiggerl K, Topic M (2018) A systematic approach to adopt sustainability and efficiency practices in energy-intensive industries. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Handbook of sustainability science and research. Springer, Berlin, pp 523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Velenturf APM, Purnell P (2017) Resource recovery from waste: restoring the balance between resource scarcity and waste overload. Sustainability 9(9):1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilber K (2000) Integral psychology. Shambhala, BostonGoogle Scholar
  37. Wittmayer J, Schaepke N, Feiner G, Piotrowski R, van Steenbergen F, Baasch S (2013) Action research for sustainability: reflections on transition management in practice. http://incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/InContext-ResearchBrief-Action_research_for_sustainability.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
  38. World Commission on Environment and Development WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Zuber-Skerrit O (2012) Action research for sustainable development in a turbulent world. Emerald, BingleyGoogle Scholar
  40. Zuber-Skerrit O, Perry C (2002) Action research within organisations and university thesis writing. Learn Organ 9(4):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zuber-Skerrit O, Wood L, Bob D (2013) Action research for sustainable development in a turbulent world: reflections and future perspectives. Action Learn Action Res J 18(2):184–203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Montanuniversitaet LeobenLeobenAustria

Section editors and affiliations

  • Evangelos Manolas
    • 1
  1. 1.Democritus University of ThraceThraceGreece