Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations for Studying Human Trafficking

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter outlines ethical considerations for doing research on human trafficking. It presents ethical challenges not only for interacting with and studying the experiences of trafficked persons and their communities but also for describing, explaining, and presenting trafficking as a social problem more generally. An ethical approach to trafficking research includes giving considerable thought to how a study is designed, ethically negotiating access to respondents, being honest about how the researcher’s social position and emotional reactions to respondents in the field will impact findings, and being diligent about recognizing ethical conundrums as they arise. The chapter begins with how researchers might consider the ethical implications of their research design, negotiate access, and address their positionality. It then turns to practical suggestions for trauma-informed and culturally sensitive data collection, in addition to guidelines for ethically representing and disseminating findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahsan, M. (2009). “The Potential and Challenges of Rights-Based Research with Children and Young People: Experiences from Bangladesh.” Children’s Geographies 7(4): 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. (2017). “With Us and About Us”: Participatory Methods in Research with “Vulnerable” or Marginalized Groups. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. and B. Kellezi (2016). “Doing Research In Immigration Removal Centres: Ethics, Emotions And Impact.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 17(2): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. (2005). “Methodological Challenges in Research with Trafficked Persons: Tales from the Field.” International Migration 43(1–2): 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunovskis, A. and R. Surtees (2010). “Untold Stories: Biases and Selection Effects in Research with Victims of Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation.” International Migration 48(4): 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess-Proctor, A. (2015). “Methodological and Ethical Issues in Feminist Research with Abused Women: Reflections on Participants’ Vulnerability and Empowerment.” Women’s Studies International Forum 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. S. and K. K. Hoang (2015). “Protagonist-Driven Urban Ethnography.” City & Community 14(4): 348–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. (2008). “Sharing Data and Results with Study Participants: Report on a Survey of Cultural Anthropologists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3(4): 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutin, S. B. and E. Vogel (2016). “Migrant Narratives and Ethnographic Tropes: Navigating Tragedy, Creating Possibilities.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 45(6): 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cwikel, J. and E. Hoban (2005). “Contentious Issues In Research on Trafficked Women Working in the Sex Industry: Study Design, Ethics, and Methodology.” The Journal of Sex Research 42(4): 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (2016). Leaving the dim-moon city of delight: terminating your fieldwork. Fieldwork in Educational Settings: Methods, Pitfalls and Perspectives. London, Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V. (2017). Emotion and Sensitive Research. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer Singapore: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doykos, B., L. Brinkley-Rubinstein, K. Craven, M. McCormack and J. Geller (2014). “Leveraging Identity, Gaining Access: Explorations of Self in Diverse Field-Based Research Settings.” Journal of Community Practice 22: 717–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. and R. Pfeffer (2014). “Policing Human Trafficking: Cultural Blinders and Organizational Barriers.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 653(1): 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2007). Designing Qualitative Research. London, SAGE Publications, Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V. and P. Alldred (2012). The Ethics of Intention: Research as a Political Tool. Ethics in Qualitative Research. London, SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M. and L. Gillam (2004). “Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston-Kolnik, J. D., C. Soibatian and M. M. Shattell (2017). “Advocates’ Experiences With Media and the Impact of Media on Human Trafficking Advocacy.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence: 0886260517692337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. (2015). Performing Ethnography: Infiltrating Prison Spaces. Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. D. Drake, R. Earle and J. Sloan, Palgrave: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2011). “Autoethnography and Emotion as Intellectual Resources: Doing Prison Research Differently.” Qualitative Inquiry: 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, S. and M. Copp (1993). Emotions and Fieldwork. London, Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. (2017). “Trauma-Informed Social Work Practice.” Social Work 62(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manohar, N., P. Liamputtong, S. Bhole and A. Arora (2017). Researcher Positionality in Cross-Cultural and Sensitive Research. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer Singapore: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. and J. Fisher (2015). “Strategies for Obtaining Access to Secretive or Guarded Organizations.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44(6): 709–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. and J. Boyden (2014). Ethics of Researching Children’s Well-Being. Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective. A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes and J. E. Korbin. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands: 2895–2918.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. and D. G. Kaloupek (2004). “The Risks and Benefits of Participating in Trauma-Focused Research Studies.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 17(5): 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, V. L. (2017). “‘It’s Good to Be Able to Talk’: An Exploration of the Complexities of Participant and Researcher Relationships When Conducting Sensitive Research.” Women’s Studies International Forum 61: 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piancanteni, L. (2015). ‘Get In, Get Out, Go Back,’: Transitioning from Prison Ethnography to Prison Policy Research in Russia. The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, C. L. (2010). “A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers.” Qualitative Research 10(3): 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, K. (2017). Coercion and Access to Health Care. Hastings Center Report. 47: 30–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, L. (2017). Feminist Dilemmas in Researching Women’s Violence: Issues of Allegiance, Representation, Ambivalence, and Compromise. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, C. H. (2005). “Seeking Informed Consent: Reflections on Research Practice.” Sociology 39(2): 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. and S. Wright (2015). Going in Green: Reflecting on the Challenges of ‘Getting In, Getting On, and Getting Out,’ for Doctoral Prison Researchers. The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography: 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, L. H. (2001). “Insider/Outsider Upsides and Downsides.” Social Work with Groups 23(2): 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. E. (2017). Doing Reflectively Engaged, Face-To-Face Research in Prisons: Contexts and Sensitivities. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer Singapore: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, N. (2017). Researching Underage Sex Work: Dynamic Risk, Responding Sensitively, and Protecting Participants and Researchers. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong. Singapore, Springer Singapore: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyldum, G. and A. Brunovskis (2005). “Describing the Unobserved: Methodological Challenges in Empirical Studies on Human Trafficking.” International Migration 43(1–2): 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIAP (2008). Guide to Ethics and Human Rights in Counter-Trafficking: Ethical Standards for Counter-Trafficking Research and Programming. Bangkok, United Nations Interagency Project on Human Trafficking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. (2015). Writing Bad: Prison Ethnography and the Problem of Tone. The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography: 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2014). “Human Trafficking and Contemporary Slavery.” Annual Review of Sociology 41(1): 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. X. (2009). “Beyond The ‘Natasha’ Story – A Review And Critique Of Current Research On Sex Trafficking.” Global Crime 10(3): 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. (1973). “On the Ethics of Intervention in Human Psychological Research: With special reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment.” Cognition 2: 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C. and C. Watts (2003). WHO Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Interviewing Trafficked Women. Geneva, World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania E. DoCarmo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DoCarmo, T.E. (2020). Ethical Considerations for Studying Human Trafficking. In: Winterdyk, J., Jones, J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Human Trafficking. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63058-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics