Skip to main content

Changing Corporate Governance in France in the Late Twentieth Century

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

France belongs to those highly developed western European countries that belong to the G7, the group of seven countries with the most developed national economies. Its national capital, Paris, is home to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD is an active promoter of international standards of corporate governance best practice. Historically, governance practices are however highly heterogeneous when comparing different national settings. At present, France shares most of the characteristics of a liberal market economy, and its code of reference for corporate governance was the first of its kind in continental Europe when first published in 1995. France’s economic history, however, has a longstanding tradition of interventionism by the State, and liberal market mechanisms did not have the favor of the political elite after World War II. Since the middle of the 1980s, the French system of corporate governance has undergone major transformations at a relatively fast pace. The public administration has increasingly retired from its active role in corporate governance matters, increasing the weight of shareholder-oriented market mechanisms. This chapter retraces the history of the French corporate governance system over the second half of the twentieth century. Significant change is shown to have occurred in three stages, whose underlying rationale appears to be broadly consistent with North’s theory of institutional change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aguilera R, Cuervo-Cazurra A (2004) Codes of good governance world-wide: what is the trigger? Organ Stud 25(3):415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera R, Jackson G (2003) The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):447–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert M (1991) Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Seuil Points, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Albouy M, Schatt A (2004) Les prises de contrôle par les actionnaires contestataires: le cas André’. Finan Contrôle Strat 7(2):33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandre H, Charreaux G (2004) Efficiency of French privatizations: a dynamic vision. J Corp Finan 10:467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M (1994) The Japanese firm as a system of attributes: a survey and research agenda. In: Aoki M, Dore R (eds) The Japanese firm: sources of competitive strength. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki M (2001) Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Roe M (1999) A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance. Stanford Law Rev 52(1):127–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglöf E (1997) Reforming corporate governance: redirecting the European agenda. Econ Policy 12(24):92–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin-Mourot B, Bauer M (1996) Vers un modèle européen de dirigeants? Une comparaison Allemagne/France/Grande-Bretagne. Probl Écon 2482:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Charreaux G (1997) Vers une théorie du gouvernement des entreprises. In: Charreaux G (ed) Le gouvernement des entreprises. Economica, Paris, pp 421–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil National du Crédit et du Titre (1999) Le financement de l’entreprise. CNCT, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily C, Dalton D, Cannella A (2003) Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau A, North D (1994) Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauroux R (1998) Etats de service. Hachette Littératures, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks J, Mayer C (1990) Capital markets and corporate control: a study of France, Germany and the UK. Econ Policy 10:191–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez P-Y, Wirtz P (2018) Successfully mobilizing for employee board representation: lessons to be learned from post-war Germany. J Manag Hist 24(3):262–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-08-2017-0039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén M (2000) Corporate governance and globalization: is there convergence across countries? Adv Comp Int Manag 13:175–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirigoyen G (1994) Brève histoire de l’O.P.A. de B.S.N. sur Saint-Gobain (décembre 1968- janvier 1969). In: De Jacques Coeur à Renault. Gestionnaires et organisations, 3ème rencontres des 25 et 26 novembre 1994. Collection Histoire, Gestion, Organisations 3. Presses de l’Université des Sciences Sociales, Toulouse, pp 369–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J Financ XLVIII(3):831–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Financ LIV(2):471–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick W, O’Sullivan M (1997) Finance and industrial development. Part I: the United States and the United Kingdom. Finan Hist Rev 4:7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Monde (06/27 and 06/28/1999) Forcing de la Banque de France pour un accord entre la BNP, SG et Paribas

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Echos (11/16–11/21/1998) L’exception française. special inquiry

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Echos (12/07–12/10/1998) Le planisphère. special inquiry on cross-shareholdings

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Echos (07/01/1999) Une nouvelle époque

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesourne J (1998) Le modèle français, grandeur et décadence. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer M, Whittington R (1999) Strategy, structure and ‘systemness’: national institutions and corporate change in France, Germany and the UK, 1950–1993. Organ Stud 20(6):933–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerland P (1995) Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems. J Econ Behav Organ 26:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1993) Five propositions about institutional change. Working paper. Center for the Study of Political Economy, Washington University, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrelevade J (1998) Le corporate governance ou les fondements incertains d’un nouveau pouvoir. Notes de la Fondation Saint-Simon, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1992) Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harv Bus Rev 70:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Riboud A (1999) Le dernier de la classe. Grasset, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt V (1996) From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneper W, Guillén M (2002) Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: a cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Working paper. The Wharton School, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1982) From substantive to procedural rationality. In: Simon HA (ed) Models of bounded rationality, vol. 2: Behavioral economics and business organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1983) Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Viénot M (1995) Le conseil d’administration des sociétés cotées. CNPF-AFEP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz P (2001) Financial policy, managerial discretion and corporate governance: the example of Usinor. Glob Focus 13(1):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz P (2008) Les meilleures pratiques de gouvernance d’entreprise. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimori M (1995) Whose company is it? The concept of the corporation in Japan and the west. Long Range Plan 28(4):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Wirtz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wirtz, P. (2019). Changing Corporate Governance in France in the Late Twentieth Century. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Management History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62348-1_95-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62348-1_95-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62348-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62348-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics