Introduction
The term physical disabilities often refers to a broad range of disabilities of people facing difficulties in limitation on physical functioning, mobility, dexterity, or stamina. These may include orthopedic and neuromuscular disabilities (such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, muscular dystrophy, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, ALS, and other orthopedic difficulties inherent or acquired), as well as sensory disabilities (e.g., visual or hearing impairment), and chronic health issues, cardiovascular or respiratory difficulties. Furthermore, the complexity of a number of diagnoses of physical disabilities often involve identification of difficulties in various aspects and interrelated sectors of the human activity and quality of life. Hence, as Heward (2011) identifies, people with physical disabilities compose an...
References
Abbott C (2007) Report 5: E-inclusion: learning difficulties and digital technologies. Futurelab, Bristol, p 2007
Abbott MA, McBride D (2014) AAC decision-making and Mobile technology: points to ponder. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 23(2):104–111
Alper S, Raharinirina S (2006) Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Spec Educ Technol 21(2):47–64
Angelo J (2000) Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 37(50):591–598
ASHA (2018) Augmentative and alternative communication. Overview. Available at https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Augmentative-and-Alternative-Communication/. Accessed 6 Mar 2018
Beyer S (2012) The progress towards integrated employment in the UK. J Vocat Rehabil 37:185–194
Bondy A, Frost L (2001) The picture exchange communication system. Behav Modif 25(5):725–744
Borgestig M, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H (2013) Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: a pilot study. Scand J Occup Ther 20(6):463–470
Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H (2016) Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology – a longitudinal study. Assist Technol 28(2):93–102
Calculator SN (2009) Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. Int J Incl Educ 13(1):93–113
Clarke M, Kirton A (2003) Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Lang Teach Ther 19(2):135–151
Cook AM, Polgar JM, Hussey AM (2008) Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practices. Mosby-Elsevier, Missouri
Copley J, Ziviani J (2004) Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 11(4):229–243
Copley J, Ziviani J (2005) Assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities. Br J Occup Ther 68:559–566
Copley J, Ziviani J (2007) Use of a TeamBased approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: a pilot study. Assist Technol 19:109–125
Costigan FA, Newell KM (2009) An analysis of constraints on access to augmentative communication in cerebral palsy. Can J Occup Ther 76(2):153–161
Cruz AM, RÃos Rincón AM, RodrÃguez Dueñas WM, Daniel Alejandro Quiroga Torres DA, Bohórquez-Heredia AF (2017) What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 12(5):429–440
CSUN Centre of Disabilities (2006) Assistive technology applications certificate program. CSUN Centre of Disabilities, Northridge
Dorrington P, Wilkinson C, Tasker L, Walters A (2016) User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. J Usability Stud 11(2):66–82
Edyburn DL (2001) Models, theories, and frameworks: contributing to understanding special education technology. Spec Educ Technol Pract 4(2):16–24
Hersh MA (2010) The design and evaluation of assistive technology products and devices part 1: design. In: Blouin M, Stone J (eds) International encyclopedia of rehabilitation [online]. CIRRIE, New York, pp 1–30
Hersh MA, Johnson MA (2008a) On modelling assistive technology systems part 1: modelling framework. Technol Disabil 20(3):193–215
Hersh MA, Johnson MA (2008b) On modelling assistive technology systems part 2: applications of the comprehensive assistive technology model. Technol Disabil 20(4):251:270
Heward W (2011) Exceptional Children, an Introduction to Special Education. Athens: Topos
Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S (2009) Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: the use of assistive devices at school by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 35(1):130–139
ISO 9999:2016 Assistive products for persons with disability – Classification and terminology, available at https://www.iso.org/standard/60547.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
Judge SL (2000) Early childhood special education: accessing and funding assistive Technology for Young Children with disabilities. Early Childhood Educ J 28:125–133
Kay D (2014) Holistic approach to physical motor access assessment in pediatric AAC. Perspect Augmen Altern Commun 23(2):84–90
Kintsch A, DePaula R (2002) A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. SWAAAC 2002: supporting learning through assistive technology 1–10
Layton N (2012) Barriers and facilitators to community mobility for assistive technology users. Rehabil Res Pract 2012:1–9
Lazar J, Jaeger P (2011) Reducing barriers to online access for people with disabilities. Issues Sci Technol Winter:69–82
Lee KS, Thomas DJ (1990) Control of computer-based technology for people with physical disabilities: an assessment manual. University of Toronto press, Toronto
Light J, Macnaughton D (2014) From basic to applied research to improve outcomes for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: potential contributions of eye tracking research methods. Augment Altern Commun 30(2):99–105
Lilienfeld M, Alant A (2005) The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: the evaluation of a peer-training program. Augment Alternat Commun 21(4):278–294
Lopresti EF, Koester HH, Simpson R (2008) Toward automatic adjustment of pointing device configuration to accommodate physical impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3(4):221–235
Mavrou K (2011a) Assistive technology as an emerging policy and practice: processes, challenges and future directions. Technol Disabil 23(1):41–52
Mavrou K (2011b) Augmentative and alternative communication and (digital) literacy: the experience of assistive technology application in cyprus through a case study (in Greek). In: Paper presented at the 14th international conference of the hellenic pedagogical association: Ekpaidefsi atomon me eidikes anagkes: Mia proklisi gia to sxolio kai tin koinonia [Educating individuals with special needs: A challenge for school and society], December 1st–3rd 2011. University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki
Mavrou K (2016) Assistive technology and AAC in Cyprus: a case study experience. In: Communication support world network newsletter
Mavrou K, Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Karki A, Sallinen M, Hoogerwerf EJ (2017) Opportunities and challenges related to ICT and ICT-AT use by people with disabilities: an explorative study into factors that impact on the digital divide. Technol Disabil 29:63–75
O’Malley P, Jenkins S, Wesley B, Donehower C, Rabuck D, Lewis MEB (2013) Effectiveness of using iPads to build math fluency. Online Submission
Oppenheim M (2016) HeadBanger: controlling switchable software with head gesture. J Assist Technol 10(1):2–10
Scherer MJ (1998) The Matching Person & Technology (MPT) model manual, 3rd edn. The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc, Webster
Scherer MJ (2004) Connecting to learn: educational and assistive Technology for People with disabilities. American Psychological Association (APA), Washington, DC
Scherer MJ (2005) Living in the state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities, 4th edn. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA
Scherer MJ, Craddock G (2002) Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil, Special Issue: The assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs 14(3):125–131
Scherer MJ, Cushman LA (2000) Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychol Rep 87:981–987
Scherer MJ, Cushman LA (2001) Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil Rehabil 23(9):387–393
Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer J (2005) Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 27(21):1321–1331
Schlieder C, Schmid U, Munz M, Stein K (2013) Assistive technology to support the mobility of senior citizens – overcoming mobility barriers and establishing mobility chains by social collaboration. Künstl Intell 27:247–253
Seymour W (2005) ICTs and disability: exploring the human dimensions of technological engagement. Technol Disabil 17:195–204
Smith M (2015) Adolescence and AAC: intervention challenges and possible solutions. Commun Disord Q 36(2):112–118
Smith M, Connolly I (2008) Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3(5):260–273
Standen PJ, Camm C, Battersby S, Brown DJ, Harrison M (2011) An evaluation of the Wii Nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Comput Educ 56(1):2–10
Veigl C, Deinhofer M, Aigner B, Miesenberger K (2017) Personalized computer access for people with severe motor disabilities. AsTeRICS, FLipMouse and the two-level personalization software engineering method. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human aspects of IT for the aged population, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_31
Watts EH, O’Brian M, Wojcik BW (2004) Four models of assistive technology consideration: how do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? J Spec Educ Technol 19(1):43–56
Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Smith SJ, Parent W, Davies DK, Stock S (2006) Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta- analysis. J Vocat Rehabil 24:81–86
WHO (2016) Priority assistive products list. Available at http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/global_survey-apl/en/. Accessed 30 Mar 2013
WHO (2017) Improving access to assistive technology: report by the director-general. Available at http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB142/B142_21-en.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2013
Zabala J (2005) Using the SETT framework to level the learning field for students with disabilities. Available at http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Leveling_the_Learning_Field.pdf
Zaphiris P, Siang Ang C (2009) Human computer interaction: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mavrou, K. (2019). Assisting People with Physical Disabilities Through Technology. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_144-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_144-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering