Skip to main content

Assisting People with Physical Disabilities Through Technology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies
  • 304 Accesses

Synonyms

Accessibility; Assistive technology; Augmentative and alternative communication; Physical access

Introduction

The term physical disabilities often refers to a broad range of disabilities of people facing difficulties in limitation on physical functioning, mobility, dexterity, or stamina. These may include orthopedic and neuromuscular disabilities (such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, muscular dystrophy, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, ALS, and other orthopedic difficulties inherent or acquired), as well as sensory disabilities (e.g., visual or hearing impairment), and chronic health issues, cardiovascular or respiratory difficulties. Furthermore, the complexity of a number of diagnoses of physical disabilities often involve identification of difficulties in various aspects and interrelated sectors of the human activity and quality of life. Hence, as Heward (2011) identifies, people with physical disabilities compose an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott C (2007) Report 5: E-inclusion: learning difficulties and digital technologies. Futurelab, Bristol, p 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MA, McBride D (2014) AAC decision-making and Mobile technology: points to ponder. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 23(2):104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alper S, Raharinirina S (2006) Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Spec Educ Technol 21(2):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelo J (2000) Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 37(50):591–598

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHA (2018) Augmentative and alternative communication. Overview. Available at https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Augmentative-and-Alternative-Communication/. Accessed 6 Mar 2018

  • Beyer S (2012) The progress towards integrated employment in the UK. J Vocat Rehabil 37:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy A, Frost L (2001) The picture exchange communication system. Behav Modif 25(5):725–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgestig M, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H (2013) Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: a pilot study. Scand J Occup Ther 20(6):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H (2016) Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology – a longitudinal study. Assist Technol 28(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calculator SN (2009) Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. Int J Incl Educ 13(1):93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, Kirton A (2003) Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Lang Teach Ther 19(2):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook AM, Polgar JM, Hussey AM (2008) Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practices. Mosby-Elsevier, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Copley J, Ziviani J (2004) Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 11(4):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley J, Ziviani J (2005) Assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities. Br J Occup Ther 68:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley J, Ziviani J (2007) Use of a TeamBased approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: a pilot study. Assist Technol 19:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costigan FA, Newell KM (2009) An analysis of constraints on access to augmentative communication in cerebral palsy. Can J Occup Ther 76(2):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz AM, Ríos Rincón AM, Rodríguez Dueñas WM, Daniel Alejandro Quiroga Torres DA, Bohórquez-Heredia AF (2017) What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 12(5):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSUN Centre of Disabilities (2006) Assistive technology applications certificate program. CSUN Centre of Disabilities, Northridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrington P, Wilkinson C, Tasker L, Walters A (2016) User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. J Usability Stud 11(2):66–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn DL (2001) Models, theories, and frameworks: contributing to understanding special education technology. Spec Educ Technol Pract 4(2):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA (2010) The design and evaluation of assistive technology products and devices part 1: design. In: Blouin M, Stone J (eds) International encyclopedia of rehabilitation [online]. CIRRIE, New York, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA, Johnson MA (2008a) On modelling assistive technology systems part 1: modelling framework. Technol Disabil 20(3):193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh MA, Johnson MA (2008b) On modelling assistive technology systems part 2: applications of the comprehensive assistive technology model. Technol Disabil 20(4):251:270

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward W (2011) Exceptional Children, an Introduction to Special Education. Athens: Topos

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S (2009) Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: the use of assistive devices at school by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 35(1):130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9999:2016 Assistive products for persons with disability – Classification and terminology, available at https://www.iso.org/standard/60547.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  • Judge SL (2000) Early childhood special education: accessing and funding assistive Technology for Young Children with disabilities. Early Childhood Educ J 28:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay D (2014) Holistic approach to physical motor access assessment in pediatric AAC. Perspect Augmen Altern Commun 23(2):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch A, DePaula R (2002) A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. SWAAAC 2002: supporting learning through assistive technology 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton N (2012) Barriers and facilitators to community mobility for assistive technology users. Rehabil Res Pract 2012:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar J, Jaeger P (2011) Reducing barriers to online access for people with disabilities. Issues Sci Technol Winter:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Thomas DJ (1990) Control of computer-based technology for people with physical disabilities: an assessment manual. University of Toronto press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Light J, Macnaughton D (2014) From basic to applied research to improve outcomes for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: potential contributions of eye tracking research methods. Augment Altern Commun 30(2):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld M, Alant A (2005) The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: the evaluation of a peer-training program. Augment Alternat Commun 21(4):278–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopresti EF, Koester HH, Simpson R (2008) Toward automatic adjustment of pointing device configuration to accommodate physical impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3(4):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrou K (2011a) Assistive technology as an emerging policy and practice: processes, challenges and future directions. Technol Disabil 23(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrou K (2011b) Augmentative and alternative communication and (digital) literacy: the experience of assistive technology application in cyprus through a case study (in Greek). In: Paper presented at the 14th international conference of the hellenic pedagogical association: Ekpaidefsi atomon me eidikes anagkes: Mia proklisi gia to sxolio kai tin koinonia [Educating individuals with special needs: A challenge for school and society], December 1st–3rd 2011. University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrou K (2016) Assistive technology and AAC in Cyprus: a case study experience. In: Communication support world network newsletter

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrou K, Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Karki A, Sallinen M, Hoogerwerf EJ (2017) Opportunities and challenges related to ICT and ICT-AT use by people with disabilities: an explorative study into factors that impact on the digital divide. Technol Disabil 29:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley P, Jenkins S, Wesley B, Donehower C, Rabuck D, Lewis MEB (2013) Effectiveness of using iPads to build math fluency. Online Submission

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim M (2016) HeadBanger: controlling switchable software with head gesture. J Assist Technol 10(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ (1998) The Matching Person & Technology (MPT) model manual, 3rd edn. The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc, Webster

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ (2004) Connecting to learn: educational and assistive Technology for People with disabilities. American Psychological Association (APA), Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ (2005) Living in the state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities, 4th edn. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ, Craddock G (2002) Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil, Special Issue: The assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs 14(3):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ, Cushman LA (2000) Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychol Rep 87:981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ, Cushman LA (2001) Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil Rehabil 23(9):387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer J (2005) Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 27(21):1321–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder C, Schmid U, Munz M, Stein K (2013) Assistive technology to support the mobility of senior citizens – overcoming mobility barriers and establishing mobility chains by social collaboration. Künstl Intell 27:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour W (2005) ICTs and disability: exploring the human dimensions of technological engagement. Technol Disabil 17:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (2015) Adolescence and AAC: intervention challenges and possible solutions. Commun Disord Q 36(2):112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Connolly I (2008) Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3(5):260–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standen PJ, Camm C, Battersby S, Brown DJ, Harrison M (2011) An evaluation of the Wii Nunchuk as an alternative assistive device for people with intellectual and physical disabilities using switch controlled software. Comput Educ 56(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veigl C, Deinhofer M, Aigner B, Miesenberger K (2017) Personalized computer access for people with severe motor disabilities. AsTeRICS, FLipMouse and the two-level personalization software engineering method. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human aspects of IT for the aged population, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watts EH, O’Brian M, Wojcik BW (2004) Four models of assistive technology consideration: how do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? J Spec Educ Technol 19(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Smith SJ, Parent W, Davies DK, Stock S (2006) Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta- analysis. J Vocat Rehabil 24:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2016) Priority assistive products list. Available at http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/global_survey-apl/en/. Accessed 30 Mar 2013

  • WHO (2017) Improving access to assistive technology: report by the director-general. Available at http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB142/B142_21-en.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2013

  • Zabala J (2005) Using the SETT framework to level the learning field for students with disabilities. Available at http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Leveling_the_Learning_Field.pdf

  • Zaphiris P, Siang Ang C (2009) Human computer interaction: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina Mavrou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mavrou, K. (2019). Assisting People with Physical Disabilities Through Technology. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_144-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_144-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics