Skip to main content

Assisting People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Through Technology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 294 Accesses

Synonyms

Deaf; Hard of hearing; Captions; Alerting devices; Text messaging; Assistive listening devices; Video streaming; Alerting devices

Introduction

Technologies assist individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with access to spoken information in classrooms, at work, and in primarily social situations; technologies also help individuals who are DHH share information with hearing individuals. These technologies make it possible for individuals who are DHH to participate effectively in activities, when it would not otherwise be possible, such as by providing captions so that individuals who are DHH can follow television programs. Some of these technologies provide information visually, and others enhance auditory information (Gallaudet 2014). Technologies that assist individuals who are DHH may have a feature, such as captions, which is specially designed for them, or may be intended for a wide range of individuals and also meet the needs of individuals who are DHH in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ambrose S, VanDam M, Moeller M (2014) Linguistic input, electronic media, and communication outcomes of toddlers with hearing loss. Ear and hear 35(2):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aussie Deaf Kids (2015) Assistive listening devices. Retrieved from http://www.aussiedeafkids.org.au/assistive-listening-devices-2.html

  • Braverman BB, Hertzog M (1980) The effects of caption rate and language level on comprehension of a captioned video presentation. Am Ann Deaf 125:943–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham D, Leigh G, Noble W, Jones C, Tyler M, Grebennikov L, Varley A (2008) Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults: effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn003. http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAT (Center on Access Technology) (2015) Deaf and hard of hearing virtual academic community procedures manual. National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester. https://www.rit.edu/ntid/dhhvac/manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthon S, Leppo R, the pepnet2 Research and Evidence Synthesis Team (2013) Accommodations quality for students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing. Am Ann Deaf 158:438–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cienkowski K, Pimentel V (2001) The hearing aid ‘effect’ revisited in young adults. British J Audiol 35:289–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen EG (2002) Cooperative learning and the equitable classroom in a multicultural society. Plenary paper presented at the IASCE conference in Manchester, England. http://www.iasce.net/publications/manchester-keynote.shtml

  • Compton-Conley C (n.d.) Hearing enhancement technology: The 30.000 foot view. Retrieved from http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/PublicHealth/HearingLossAging/2-1%20Compton-Conley%20pdf.pdf

  • De Raeve L (2015) Classroom adaptations for effective learning by deaf students. In: Knoors H, Marshark M (eds) Educating deaf learners: creating a global evidence base. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 547–573

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon H (2012) Hearing aid systems. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot LB, Rubin B, DeCaro JJ, Clymer EW, Earp K, Fish MD (2013) Creating a virtual academic community for STEM students. J Appl Res High Educ 5:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmonde I (2009) Ideas and identities: supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Rev Educ Res 79:1008–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission (2017) Video relay services, Washington, DC. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/video-relay-services

  • Gallaudet University (2014) Assistive technologies for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center, Washington, DC. http://www3.gallaudet.edu/clerc-center/info-to-go/assistive-technology/assistive-technologies.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray T (2008) Trends and challenges in 2008. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Programs Project Directors Meeting, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray T, Siver-Pacuilla H, Brann A, Overton C, Reynold R (2011) Converging trends in educational and assistive technology. In: Gray T, Silver-Pacuilla H (eds) Breakthrough teaching and learning: how educational and assistive technologies are driving innovation. Springer, New York, pp 5–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins J, Bakke M (2011) Technologies for communication: Status and trends. In Marschark M, Spencer P (eds.) Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Vol 1. (2nd ed.) Oxford University Press, New York, pp 425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinman R, Lupton E, Leeb S, Al-Thaddeus A, Gimore R, Paul D, Peterson N (2003) Using talking lights illuminated-based communication networks to enhance word comprehension by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Am J Audiol 12:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart F (2002) Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms. Am J Audiol 13:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly R, Quagliata A, DeMartino R, Perotti V (2016) 21st century deaf workers: going beyond “just employed” to career growth and entrepreneurship. In: Marschark M, Lampropoulou V, Skordilis E (eds) Diversity in deaf education. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 441–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Kim C (2014) A review of assistive listening device and digital wireless technology for hearing instruments. Korean J Audiol 18:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoors H, Hermans D (2010) Effective instruction for deaf and hard-of-hearing students: teaching strategies, school settings, and student characteristics. In: Marschark M, Spencer P (eds) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochkin S (2013, March) The importance of captioned telephone service in meeting the needs of people with hearing loss. The Hearing Review. Retrieved from www.hearingreview.com

  • Lewis MSJ, Jackson DW (2001) Television literacy: comprehension of program content using closed captions for the deaf. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 6:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liss MB, Price D (1981) What, when & why deaf children watch television. Am Ann Deaf 126:493–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissaman R, Pomerai SD, Tripconey S (2009) Using live, online tutoring to inspire post 16 students to engage with higher level mathematics. Teach Math Its Appl 28:216–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta VN, Hofstein A, Clough MP (2007) Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: an analysis of research, theory, and practice. In: Abel S, Lederman G (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 393–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark M, Leigh G, Sapere P, Burnham D, Convertino C, Stinson M, Knoors H, Vervloed MPJ, Noble W (2006) Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students’ classroom learning. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 11:421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MITRE (2016) Better telecom technology helps an underserved community reach out. MITRE Corporation, MacLean. https://www.mitre.org/publications/project-stories/better-telecom-technology-helps-an-underserved-community-reach-out

  • National Captioning Institute (1983) Hearing impaired children’s comprehension of closed captioned television programs. Research report 85–3. National Captioning Institute, Falls Church

    Google Scholar 

  • National Deaf Children’s Society (2017) How technology can help. NDCS, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaraizi M, Vekiri I, Easterbrooks S (2013) Investigating deaf students’ use of visual multimedia resources in reading comprehension. Am Ann Deaf 157:458–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Educational Technology (2010) Transforming American education: learning powered by technology. Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton G, McLachlan J, Weiss B, Rahman M (2017) Telephony speech-to-text: an adequate analog to internet protocol caption telephone services. MITRE Corporation, MacLean

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63:167–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power MR, Power D, Horstmanshof L (2007) Deaf people communicating via SMS, TTY, relay service, and computers in Australia. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 12:80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi S, Mitchell RE (2012) Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: past, present, and future. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 17:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rekkedal A (2011) Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: factors that promote satisfaction. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 17:499–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JTE (2009) Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in humanities courses in distance education. Arts Human High Educ 8:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan S, Wobbrock J, Liou K, Ng A, Landay J (2016) Speech is 3x faster than typing for English and Mandarin text entry on mobile devices. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1608.07323

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuell T (1996) Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In: Brophy J, Gage N (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. Random House, Chicago, pp 726–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg A, Barnett S, Meador H, Wiggins E, Zazove P (2006) Health care system accessibility: experiences and perceptions of deaf people. J Gen Intern Med 21:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson MS (2010) Current and future technologies in the education of deaf students. In: Marschark M, Spencer P (eds) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson MS, Kluwin TN (2011) Educational consequences of alternative school placements. In: Marschark M, Spencer P (eds) Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, vol 1, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson M, Elliot L, Francis P (2008) The C-print system: using captions to support classroom communication access and learning by deaf and hard of hearing students. In: Schlenker-Schulte C, Weber A (eds) Barrieren überwinden – Teilhabe ist möglich! Neckar-Verlag, Villingen-Schwenningen, pp 102–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson MS, Elliot LB, Kelly RR, Liu Y (2009) Deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ memory of lectures with speech-to-text and interpreting/note taking services. J Spec Educ 43:52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson MS, Elliot LB, Easton D (2014a) Deaf/hard of hearing and other postsecondary learners’ retention of STEM content with tablet computer-based notes. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 19:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson M, Leannah C, MacDonald J, Powers C (2014b, June) Using technology to improve communication in small groups with deaf and hearing students. Paper presented at the Effective Access Technology conference, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson M, Ahmed S, Elliot L, Easton D (2017a) Using automatic speech recognition to facilitate communication between an individual who is hearing and one who is deaf or hard of hearing. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on computers and accessibility (ASSETS17). ACM, New York, pp 407–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134797

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson MS, Elliot LB, Kelly RR (2017b) Deaf and hard-of-hearing high school and college students’ perceptions of speech-to-text and interpreting/note taking services and motivation. J Dev Phys Disord 29:131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9534-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzhel V, Gadlu K, Ali R, Kabza E (2017) Fire alarm for deaf/hearing impaired people. University of Oslo, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E, Mills E, Mulder H, Goldbeck F, Marquis F, John A, Hudson M, Peters R, Lianos L (2013) Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients Using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system. J Am Ac Audiol 24:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanin J, Rance G (2016) Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting. Int J Audiol 55:723–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1225991

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Stinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Stinson, M., Nikolaraizi, M. (2019). Assisting People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Through Technology. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_143-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_143-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60013-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics