Management of Hazardous Paper Mill Wastes for Sustainable Agriculture

  • A. K. Sannigrahi
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The papermaking has far-reaching environmental impacts due to the production of wastes in the form of sludge since that is creating major problems to soil, crop, and human health due to the presence of different toxic chemicals like arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, etc. India has about 700 pulp and paper mills, which are generally considered as most polluting industries. Different paper mills use different raw materials like bamboo, wood, paddy straw, waste papers, etc. The quality of effluents also varies with quality of inputs/raw materials as well as technical procedures followed in papermaking. Paper mill wastes are the residuals constituted with fibers produced from the pulping of raw materials but unsuitable for papermaking, paper sludge, lime sludge, inks, fly ash, clays, and other fillers developed in de-inking process. These solid wastes in some cases are utilized for energy generation, but in many places those are disposed of by dumping on land by the side of effluent channel. Management of these solid wastes for beneficial utilization is a great challenge not only to the management authority of paper industry but also the scientific community for finding out some amicable solutions. Since this solid waste contains a considerable quantity of organic matter, this must be utilized for some beneficial purposes. Vermicomposting is the rapid as well as cost-effective treatment method for recycling the organic solid waste through the action of earthworms. The worms act as an aerator, a grinder, a crusher, a chemical degrader, and a biological stimulator. Worms decompose the organic fraction in the sewage sludge, mineralize the nutrients, ingest the heavy metals, and devour the pathogens (bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and protozoa). Paper mill wastes are not easy material to compost and normally need both structural and nitrogen amendments using different organic matters like sawdust, fruit and vegetable wastes, food processing industry’s wastes, leaf litters, cow dung, pig wastes, poultry wastes, water hyacinth, municipal solid wastes, etc. before composting. Vermicomposting of paper mill wastes is not only a value addition to problematic wastes but also its beneficial utilization for sustaining organic agriculture. It helps to reduce the problem of environment pollution and creates an opportunity for employment generation.

Keywords

Earthworm Energy recovery Hazardous waste Heavy metals Landfill Land spreading Paper mill wastes Pulp and paper mill sludge Social benefits Sustainable agriculture Vermicomposting Waste quality 

References

  1. Abdullah R, Ishak CF, Kadir WR, Abu Bakar R (2015) Characterization and feasibility assessment of recycled paper mill sludges for land application in relation to the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(8):9314–9329.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahirwar MK, Gupta GS, Kirar N, Ahirwar P (2015) Monitoring of heavy metals in effluent of Orient paper mill, Amlai (Shahdol), M.P. Int J Chem Stud 3(4):6–9Google Scholar
  3. Ahmaruzzaman M (2011) Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of waste water laden with heavy metals. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 166:36–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali M, Sreekrishnan TR (2001) Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill effluents: a review. Adv Environ Res 5:175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Welch C, Metzger JD (2004) Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries: 1. Effects on growth and yields. Bioresour Technol 93:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arancon NQ, Galvis PA, Edwards CA (2005) Suppression of insect pest populations and damage to plants by vermicomposts. Bioresour Technol 96:1137–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajpai P (2015) Generation of waste in pulp and paper mills. In: Management of pulp and paper mill waste. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11788-1_2
  8. Butt KR (1993) Utilisation of solid paper mill sludge and spent brewery yeast as a feed for soil-dwelling earthworms. Bioresour Technol 44:105–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calace N, Nardi E, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M (2002) Adsorption of phenols by paper mill sludges. Environ Pollut 118:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calace N, Nardi E, Petronio BM, Pietroletti M, Tosti G (2003) Metal ion removal from water by sorption on paper mill sludge. Chemosphere 51(8):797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cardoso L, Remirez (2002) Vermicomposting of sewage sludge: a new technology for Mexico. J Water Sci Technol 46:153–158Google Scholar
  12. Cernec F, Zule J, Moze A, Ivanus A (2005) Chemical and microbiological stability of waste sludge from paper industry intended for brick production. Waste Manag Res 23(2):106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakrabarti SK (2006) Environment management in pulp and paper industry beyond current legislations and CREP commitments. Indian Pulp Paper Tech Assoc J 18:143–149Google Scholar
  14. Champagne P, Westman T (2012) Potential utilization of pulp and paper mill biosolids in composting and plant production: a case study at St Marys Papers Ltd (Canada). Int J Environ Waste Manag 10(2/3):118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Confederation of European Paper Industry (CEPI) (2006) Special recycling 2005 statistics, 2006. http://www.cepi.org
  16. CSE (2013) Centre for Science and Environment – paper industry report. http://ipma.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CSE-Paper-Industry-Report-2013.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2017
  17. D’Souza DT, Tiwari R, Sah AK, Raghukumar C (2006) Enhanced production of laccase by a marine fungus during treatment of coloured effluents and synthetic dyes. Enzym Microb Technol 38:504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deka S, Yasmin S (2006) Utilization of lime sludge waste from paper mills for fish culture. Curr Sci 90(8):1126–1130Google Scholar
  19. Dongieux P (1999) Commercially viable products that utilize pulp and paper mill sludge as raw material source. International environmental conference, TAPPI Proceedings, pp 745–753Google Scholar
  20. Edwards CA, Arancon NQ (2004) Vermicomposts suppress plant pest and disease attacks. Biocycle 45(3):51–54Google Scholar
  21. Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Emerson E, Pulliam R (2007) Suppressing plant parasitic nematodes and arthropod pests with vermicompost teas. Biocycle 48:38–39Google Scholar
  22. Eifling RB, Ebbers HJ (2006) Cellulose absorbent. U S Patent 7038104 B1Google Scholar
  23. Elliott A, Mahmood T (2005) Survey benchmarks generation, management of solid residues. Pulp Pap 79(12):49–55Google Scholar
  24. Elvira C, Dominguez J (1995) Vermicomposting for the paper pulp industry. Biocycle 36(6):62–63Google Scholar
  25. Elvira C, Goicoechea M, Sampedro L, Mato S, Nogales R (1996) Bioconversion of solid paper pulp mill sludge by earthworms. Bioresour Technol 57:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernandez-Gomez MJ, Diaz-Ravina M, Romero E, Nogales R (2013) Recycling of environmentally problematic plant wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through vermicomposting. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heuval MRV, Ellis RJ (2002) Timing of exposure to a pulp and paper effluent influences the manifestation of reproductive effects in rainbow trout. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2338–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hossain K, Ismail N (2015) Bioremediation and detoxification of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. Res J Environ Toxicol 9(3):113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) (2001) Reference document on best available techniques in the pulp and paper industry. European Commission, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  30. IPMA (2016) Indian Paper Manufacturers Association – Paper Industry Statistics. http://ipma.co.in/paper-industry/production-trends. Accessed 26 June 2017
  31. Jemison J, Williams M (2002) Potato-grain study project report. http://www.umaine.edu/waterquality/Agriculture/PotatoGrain2002.htm
  32. Joshi R, Vig AP, Singh J (2013) Vermicompost as soil supplement to enhance growth, yield and quality of Triticum aestivum L: a field study. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 2:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joyce TW, Webb AA, Dugal HS (1979) Quality and composition of pulp and paper mill primary sludge. Resour Recover Conserv 4:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kakahi FB, Kulkarni S, Pathade GR (2011) A review on the role of microorganisms in treatment of paper and pulp industry effluent. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 10(3):361–368Google Scholar
  35. Kay M (2002) Development of waste management options for paper sludge. 4th annual Dutch International Paper and Board Technology event. Pira InternationalGoogle Scholar
  36. Kok JM (1983) Process for the preparation of a liquid absorbing and shock absorbing material, U S Patent 4374794Google Scholar
  37. Kumar V, Chopra AK (2016) Reduction of pollution load of paper mill effluent by phytoremediation technique using water caltrop (Trapa natans L.) Cogent Environ Sci 2:1153216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311483.2016.1153216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kunzler C (2001) Pulp and paper industry’s diverse organics stream. Biocycle 42(5):30–33Google Scholar
  39. Lazcano C, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Dominguez J (2011) Yield and fruit quality of four sweet corn hybrids (Zea mays) under conventional and integrated fertilization with vermicompost. J Sci Food Agric 91:1244–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowe HE, Yoder LR, Clayton CN (1988) Non-clay oil and grease absorbent. U S Patent 4734393Google Scholar
  41. Luqman M, Bhutt T, Tanvir A, Atiq M, Hussan MZY, Yaseen M (2013) Phytoremediation of polluted water by trees: a review. Int J Agric Res Rev 1:22–25Google Scholar
  42. Mathur RM, Thapliyal BP, Singh K (2009) Challenges confronting Indian paper industry in changing scenario. Indian Pulp Paper Tech Assoc J 21(3):95–99Google Scholar
  43. Mohapatra D, Sahoo KK, Sannigrahi AK (2017a) Impact of structural amendment of paper mill wastes with different organic materials on vermicomposting using Eisenia fetida earthworms. J Environ Waste Manag 4(1):53–63. http://www.premierpublishers.org. ISSN: 1936-8798Google Scholar
  44. Mohapatra D, Sahoo KK, Sannigrahi AK (2017b) Impact of bed preparation techniques with different substrates on vermicomposting of paper mill wastes. CIB Tech J Biotechnol 6(2):1–9Google Scholar
  45. Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C (2009) Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag 29(1):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Natarajan N, Gajendran M (2014) Vermiconversion of paper mill sludge for recycling the nutrients using earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 8(9):06–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 76:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nemati MR, Caron J, Gallichand J (2000) Using Paper De-inking sludge to maintain soil structural form. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norris M, Titshall LW (2011) The potential for direct application of paper mill sludge to land: a greenhouse study. Int J Environ Res 5(3):673–680Google Scholar
  50. Pierre V, Phillip R, Margnerite L, Pierrette C (1982) Antibacterial activity of the hemolytic system from the earthworm Eisenia foetida Andrei. Invertebr Pathol 40:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ponmani S, Udayasoorian C, Jayabalakrishnan RM, Kumar KV (2014) Vermicomposting of paper mill solid waste using epigeic earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. J Environ Biol 35(7):617–622Google Scholar
  52. Quintern M (2014) Full scale vermicomposting and land utilization of pulpmill solids in combination with municipal biosolids (sewage sludge). Ecol Environ 180:65–76Google Scholar
  53. Quintern M, Morley M, Seaton B, Hamilton R (2016) How we transform industrial organic waste into vermicompost and champion environmental sustainability. Ecol Environ 202:147–159.  https://doi.org/10.2495/WM160141 Google Scholar
  54. Rajput D, Bhagade SS, Raut SP, Ralegaonkar RV, Mandavgane SA (2012) Reuse of cotton and recycle paper mill waste as building material. Constr Build Mater 34:470–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramaseshan S (1989) The history of paper industry in India up to 1948. Indian J Hist Sci 24(2):103–121Google Scholar
  56. Raut SP, Sedmake R, Dhunde S, Ralegaonkar RV, Mandavgane SA (2012) Reuse of recycle paper mill waste in energy absorbing light weight bricks. Constr Build Mater 27:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ribeiroa P, Albuquerquea A, Quinta-Novab L, Cavaleiroa V (2010) Recycling pulp mill sludge to improve soil fertility using GIS tools. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1303–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roy S, Arunachalam K, Dutta BK, Arunachalam A (2010) Effect of organic amendments of soil on growth and productivity of three common crops viz. Zea mays, Phaseolus vulgaris and Abelmoschus esculentus. Appl Soil Ecol 45:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sandstrom O, Neuman E (2003) Long-term development in a Baltic fish community exposed to bleached pulp mill effluent. Aquat Ecol 37:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sannigrahi AK, Chakrabortty S (2000) Impact of composting techniques on the availability of NPK and microbial population in composts. Environ Ecol 18(4):888–890Google Scholar
  61. Sannigrahi AK, Sannigrahi D (2006) Two stage composting technique for rapid and beneficial utilization of firm wastes. Indian Farmers Dig 39(11):17–21Google Scholar
  62. Singleton DR, Hendrix BF, Coleman DC, Whitemann WB (2003) Identification of uncultured bacteria tightly associated with the intestine of the earthworms Lumbricus rubellus. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1547–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sonowal P, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad AS (2013) Feasibility of vermicomposting dewatered sludge from paper mills using Perionyx excavatus. Eur J Environ Sci 3:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sonowal P, Khwairakpam M, Kalamdhad AS (2014) Vermicomposting of solid pulp and paper mill sludge (SPPMS) using Eudrilus eugeniae earthworm. Int J Environ Sci 5(3):502–514.  https://doi.org/10.6088/ijes.2014050100044 Google Scholar
  65. Suryan S, Ahluwalia SS (2012) Biosorption of heavy metals by paper mill waste from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci 2(3):1331–1343Google Scholar
  66. Thyagarajan LP, Meenambal T, Mangaleshwaran L, Lakshminarasimaiah N, Ramesh N (2010) Recycling of pulp and paper industry sludge with sawdust by aerobic composting method. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 9(1):149–154Google Scholar
  67. Tucker P (2005) Co-composting paper mill sludge’s with fruit and vegetable wastes. The University of Paisley, Paisley, pp 1–168Google Scholar
  68. Tucker P, Douglas P (2001) Newspapers, metals and the environment. University of Paisley, Paisley. ISBN 1-903978-02-5Google Scholar
  69. Yadav A, Madan S (2013) Nutrient status of vermicompost of paper mill sludge with different wastes by using Eisenia fetida. Eur J Appl Sci 5(2):62–66.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ejas.2013.5.2.2399 Google Scholar
  70. Zule J, Černec F, Likon M (2007) Chemical properties and biodegradability of waste paper mill sludge to be used for landfill covering. Waste Manag Res 6(25):538–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Sannigrahi
    • 1
  1. 1.Proof & Experimental Establishment (PXE)Defence Research & Development OrganizationBalasoreIndia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Environmental SciencesNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations