Skip to main content

Double Dissociation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 947 Accesses

The paradigm of double dissociation is of considerable historical importance. The term, first proposed by Hans-Lukas Teuber (1955), refers to a situation in which a lesion of brain area A impairs function 1 but not function 2, while a lesion of brain area B produces the reverse pattern. Teuber argued that double dissociations were “needed for conclusive proof (p. 283)” of localization of function. For many years, observations of double dissociations were felt to permit strong inferences about localization of discrete cognitive abilities. Familiar (albeit simplified) examples of such dissociations include expressive vs. receptive language (Broca’s area vs. Wernicke’s area) and verbal memory vs. visual memory (left temporal lobe vs. right temporal lobe). Substantial advances in the development of clinical neuropsychology were supported by demonstrations of other dissociations.

The concept was adopted and subsequently modified by cognitive neuropsychologists who produced elegant...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Reading

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Double dissociations: Not magic, but still useful. Cortex, 39(1), 129–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2010). Double dissociation: Understanding its role in cognitive neuropsychology. Mind and language, 25(5), 500–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2003). The elusive dissociation. Cortex, 39(1), 177–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed associations. Psychological Review, 95(1), 91–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juola, K., & Plunkett, P. (2000). Why double dissociations don’t mean much. In G. Cohen, R. Johnston, & K. Plunkett (Eds.), Exploring cognition: Damaged brains and neural networks (pp. 319–328). East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuber, H.-L. (1955). Physiological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 267–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Caplan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Caplan, B. (2018). Double Dissociation. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9280

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics