Skip to main content

Jenkins v. U.S. (1962)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 10 Accesses

Synonyms

Admissibility of psychological evidence; Competence to testify

Historical Background

Vincent E. Jenkins was a defendant who mounted an insanity defense, introducing the testimony of psychiatrists and psychologists that he was suffering a mental disease (schizophrenia) at the time of a sexual assault. The trial court instructed the jury to disregard psychometric evidence on the grounds that psychologists were disqualified from testifying about mental disease because of a lack of medical training. The appeals court for the Second District reversed the trial court ruling, ordering the new trial to include psychological testimony and psychometric findings. The appeals court noted that a diverse array of nonphysicians (e.g., doctoral-level toxicologists) regularly offered opinions. The majority opinion offered a two-pronged test of admissibility for psychologists’ testimony: (1) the actual experience of the witness and (2) the probative value of his opinion. This opinion implies...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Greiffenstein, M. F. (2009). Basics of forensic neuropsychology. In J. Morgan & J. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., & Cohen, L. (2005). Neuropsychology and the law: Principles of productive attorney-neuropsychologists relations. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins v. United States, 307 F. 2d 637 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. M. (2008). Admissibility of neuropsychological evidence in criminal cases: Competency, insanity, culpability, and mitigation. In R. Denney & J. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Heilbronner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heilbronner, R.L. (2018). Jenkins v. U.S. (1962). In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_2233

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics