- Robert L. HeilbronnerAffiliated withChicago Neuropsychology Group Email author
Refers to any relevant circumstances in correspondence with the evidence presented during the trial that, from the perspective of the jurors, makes the harshest penalty appropriate. By contrast, mitigating factors refer to evidence regarding the defendant’s character or circumstances related to the crime that would provide foundation for a juror to vote for a lesser sentence.
In 1972, the US Supreme Court considered the death penalty to be a cruel and an unusual punishment because the manner in which capital sentences were decided in Georgia was capricious (Furman v. Georgia1972). This decision discontinued death penalty litigation in the USA at that time because none of the states had a system that was substantially different. In 1976 (Gregg v. Georgia), the Court accepted as constitutional Georgia’s rewrite of their statute which included a capital sentencing process that required presentation before a judge or jury of aggravating and mitigating factors. ...
Reference Work Entry Metrics
Date: 2017 (Latest)History
- 2017 (Latest)
- Aggravating Factors
- Reference Work Title
- Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
- pp 1-2
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright Holder
- Springer International Publishing AG
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- eBook Packages
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.