- David HulacAffiliated withDepartment of School Psychology, College of Education and Behavioral Sciences, University of Northern Colorado Email author
The neuropsychological construct of abstract reasoning refers to an individual’s ability to recognize patterns and relationships of theoretical or intangible ideas. Abstract reasoning is contrary to concrete reasoning whereby an individual recognizes patterns in information obtained through the immediate senses. When thinking abstractly, an individual must be able to identify rules and apply those rules to information without the aid of empirical help or personal experience.
Abstract reasoning is most closely related to rational thought as opposed to empirical thought. While using deductive reasoning, a purely rational thinker does not look to determine the accuracy of a premise, but seeks only to understand the relationship between the premises.
Premise 1: Egypt is located in South America.
Premise 2: The Sphinx lies in Egypt.
Conclusion: The Sphinx is located in ...
Reference Work Entry Metrics
Date: 2017 (Latest)History
- 2017 (Latest)
- Abstract Reasoning
- Reference Work Title
- Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
- pp 1-2
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright Holder
- Springer International Publishing AG
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- eBook Packages
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.