Definition
Visual modularity is a conceptualization of visual function that maintains that the various properties that comprise visual perception (form, color, texture, motion, etc.) are the by-product of separate processes that occur in distinct cortical or subcortical regions of the brain (Calabretta and Parisi 2005). These processes operate to a greater or lesser extent independent of each other but are integrated to yield a uniform percept under normal conditions. These separate visual processes are thought of as modules, each operating with different computational characteristics that enable them to analyze and reconstruct visual input.
Historical Background
Visual modularity is an extension of a broader theoretical framework upon which philosophers, psychologists, cognitive scientists, and neuroscientists have approached the study of “mind” over the past century. In general systems theory, modularity is defined by the...
References and Readings
Chalupa, L., & Werner, J. S. (2004). The visual neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cogan, D. G. (1979). Visuospatial dysgnosia. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 88(3 Pt 1), 361–368.
Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1983). The anatomic basis of pure alexia. Neurology, 33(12), 1573–1583.
De Renzi, E., Scotti, G., & Spinnler, H. (1969). Perceptual and associative disorders of visual recognition. Relationship to the side of the cerebral lesion. Neurology, 19(7), 634–642.
Deubel, H., Gopher, D., & Koriat, A. (1999). Separate mechanisms for the adaptive control of reactive, volitional, and memory-guided saccadic eye movements. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 697–721). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Farah, M. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goodwin, J. (2002). Disorders of higher cortical visual function. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2(5), 418–422.
Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mishkin, M., Carson, R. E., et al. (1991). Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 88, 1621–1625.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 229–289.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195(1), 215–243.
Kaas, J. H., & Collins, C. E. (Eds.). (2003). The primate visual system. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Landis, T., Regard, M., Bliestle, A., & Kleihues, P. (1988). Prosopagnosia and agnosia for noncanonical views. An autopsied case. Brain, 111(Pt. 6), 1287–1297.
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., Macko, K. A., & Yantis, S. (2000). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. In S. Yantis (Ed.), Visual perception: Essential readings (pp. 296–302). New York: Psychology Press.
Poppelreuter, W. (1990). Disturbances of lower and higher visual capacities caused by occipital damage: With special reference to the psychopathological, pedagogical, industrial, and social implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4(2), 157–165.
Whiteley, A. M., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). Prosopagnosia: A clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 40(4), 395–403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cohen, R. (2017). Visual Modularity. In: Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1416-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1416-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences